论编辑的法律意识及其权利义务   总被引：19，自引：5，他引：14  

汤啸天 《编辑学报》2000,12(2):66-69

提高期刊编辑的法律意识是办好期刊的重要条件,期刊编辑必须建立和不断完善法律意识,以法律为准绳规范自己的行为,明确出版者的基本权利与义务是正确维护出版者权益的必要前提,编辑部及时履行审稿答复义务,可以有效地制止“一稿多投”现象,以抄袭剽窃之作骗取出版的,期刊编辑部有权追究其合同违约的法律责任。  相似文献   

数字化权与数字图书馆   总被引：5，自引：0，他引：5  

秦珂 《图书馆杂志》2003,22(7):7-9,12

传统作品数字化所涉及的版权问题对于图书馆有着重要的意义，也是图书馆数字化进程中最先遇到的问题。文章介绍了学术界对作品数字化法律性质的不同认识，分析了数字化权的法律地位，着重就图书馆对不同版权状态的作品数字化时的版权保护方法进行了阐述。  相似文献   

WTO与我国版权贸易体制改革   总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1  

商晓帆  孙萌萌 《中国图书馆学报》2003,29(4)

加入WTO意味着我国必须改革现行版权贸易体制 ,使其符合新规则的要求。面对我国版权贸易体制中存在的问题 ,应采取的对策有 :进一步完善立法、加大力度打击盗版活动、完善版权管理体制与机制、积极发展版权贸易代理制、积极推进网络版权贸易。表 1。参考文献15。  相似文献   

Academic Libraries and Copyright: Unveiling Inadequacies of Current Law Through the Analysis of Processes Included in Quality Management Systems     

Juan-Carlos Fernández-Molina  Margarita Pérez-Pulido  José-Luis Herrera-Morillas 《The Journal of Academic Librarianship》2017,43(3):184-192

Most information resources that make up university library collections are copyrighted works, which means that conflicts between such rights and the activities of libraries are common. The development of the digital setting has affected both sectors. On the one hand, it has led to changes in copyright legislation; on the other, it has affected the services provided by libraries, as they adapt to the new needs of users and to the characteristics of digital information. This paper aims to discover where the main points of collision between the two sides lie, and to what extent they are adequately resolved by the present legislation governing copyright. To this end we use a list of the main processes of academic libraries taken from quality manuals of a sample of Spanish university libraries. The results make manifest that the evolution of both sides is not yet balanced, and important maladjustments interfere with an adequate provision of services in academic libraries. Some are resolved through new legal proposals, but for many others there is no proper solution in sight.  相似文献   

版权保护与数字图书馆的合理使用   总被引：13，自引：0，他引：13  

阮延生 《福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2003,(2):136-140

数字图书馆的出现必然引起一系列新的版权保护问题。本通过近几年国内外及世界版权组织版权法的分析，探究版权保护对数字图书馆的影响，以及在数字图书馆建设与服务过程中如何遵循合理使用制度等问题。  相似文献   

Between Two Worlds: Australian Publishing on the Horns of an Import Dilemma     

Steve Carey 《Publishing Research Quarterly》2008,24(3):156-164

This article looks at the consequences of the 1991 amendment to the Australian Copyright Act, which meant that, for the copyright owner or authorised distributor to attain the right to control imports, it had to make the book available in Australia within 30 days of first publication overseas; and, to retain that right, it had to notify the retailer within 7 days of receiving an order whether it could be fulfilled within 90 days, and then in fact do so (. Accessed 28 June 2008). The article discusses the background to that change, what has happened since and what arguments are marshalled by those in favour of the status quo (restrictions that must be qualified for), and those in favour of a completely open market. The arguments used say much about the current preoccupations of those in Australian publishing. The debate around whether booksellers should be free to import copies of a new book from any supplier willing to sell them boils down to four issues: the availability in Australia of books published overseas; the price of books in Australia; the preservation of Australian publishing; and the protection of the rights of copyright holders. Those in favour of the open market believe that it would improve the first two without diminishing the latter two; those who support the status quo, that changing would bring no substantial benefits, and hurt both publishing and the rights of copyright holders. In summary, the reasons for maintaining the status quo are that things work fine as they are; that Australian literature (authors, bookshops, publishers) would suffer if things changed; and that the publisher is entitled to protect its investment through territorial control of copyright. The reasons for going to a completely open market are that only an open market can determine market price; that booksellers are unfairly disadvantaged competing against online sellers, on whom parallel importing restrictions are effectively not imposed; that copyright holders lose their rights when they sell something, and shouldn’t get a secondary chance to protect their investment; there is already a de facto open market, which unfairly restricts those who obey the law; there is a narrow window of opportunity for selling a book, which the current restrictions don’t serve; and the current situation is a poor compromise that doesn’t achieve the benefits of the open market.  相似文献   

欧洲数字图书馆的版权解决方案及其启示     

钟永恒 《数字图书馆论坛》2008,(1):33-36

文章探讨了欧洲数字图书馆建设中版权解决方案,包括高级原则、数字保存原则、孤本作品版权解决原则、绝版作品版权解决原则等,并分析了这一解决方案对我国数字图书馆建设解决版权问题的借鉴意义。  相似文献   

媒介融合背景下的版权保护策略--基于混合策略纳什均衡博弈理论     

黄先蓉  刘玲武 《出版科学》2016,(1):18-23

基于博弈理论,建立以国家、版权企业和侵权盗版者三者为利益主体的博弈模型,并分析其两两之间的博弈关系及均衡情况,在对博弈结果分析的基础上提出加大处罚、打击侵权盗版,联合维权、降低维权成本,加强宣传、提高全民版权意识,完善法律、修订“技术中立”原则等版权保护策略。  相似文献   

数字环境下著作权隐喻运用的现状及其完善策略     

王清  唐伶俐 《出版科学》2016,24(3):20-23

通过分析数字环境下著作权法的两种重要隐喻运用的失灵现状,考察数字技术挑战隐喻运用的原因,提出基于公共利益价值定位的完善著作权隐喻运用的策略建议。  相似文献   

确立编辑修改权之审思--兼评《著作权法修订草案》对相关条款的修改     

钱静 《出版科学》2016,24(6):28-31

《著作权法修订草案送审稿》删除《著作权法》第34条编辑修改权条款的做法有欠妥当。建议保留原有条款,确立编辑修改权。因为确立编辑修改权是权利义务对等的法理要求,是编辑工作正常进行的必然要求,同时也与编辑为出版物付出的劳动相匹配。另外,从权利边界的视角考察,编辑修改权的确立,能够从权利相对面的维度,厘清保护作品完整权的含义和边界。  相似文献