排序方式： 共有7条查询结果，搜索用时 0 毫秒
1
1.
Researchers undertake a number of different research evaluation tasks, taking up a substantial part of their research time—estimated
to about one work month per year for a professor. This paper addresses the various evaluator roles and tasks researchers take
on, and the tensions they involve. How the research evaluator role may conflict with the researcher role and with societal
expectations is discussed, as well as the intrinsic tensions in peer review; including expertise vs. impartiality, evaluators
as neutral judges vs. exercise of power and influence, divergent peer assessments vs. the need for unanimous conclusions in
peer panels, peer review vs. increase in quantitative indicators, and accountability to society vs. peer review as preserving
the autonomy of science. The examination of these tensions provides insight in the political aspects of peer review, and a
basis for discussing an agenda for future studies on the role of peer evaluators. Major future challenges for peer review
concern how to meet demands for transparency and public accountability, and maintain academic autonomy. 相似文献
2.
Minerva - Notions of research quality are contextual in many respects: they vary between fields of research, between review contexts and between policy contexts. Yet, the role of these co-existing... 相似文献
3.
Beyond rather general complaints about budgets not matching the necessary costs of ‘integration’, financial aspects have not obtained much attention in special education research. The importance that different fiscal frameworks may play in shaping equality policy programmes towards different organisational forms at the national, district or school levels, has to a large extent been overlooked. Most equality policy programmes imply a relatively high degree of autonomy being given to the school‐site level, but few studies have so far systematically analysed how such funding streams are mobilised and put into use by administrators and teachers at the local school level. As a means a highlighting some of these questions we report on a study that has (a) analysed the relations between income level and expenditure on special education in Norwegian municipalities, and (b) made attempts at examining possible connections between organisational quality and level of expenditure on special education in four strategically sampled schools. 相似文献
4.
This article investigates the contention that we are seeing the emergence of new forms of knowledge production, transforming the expectations and assessment of fundamental research. We examine three dimensions in the assessment of research. Our studies show little evidence of any significant change in practice in the three sectors in which research is undertaken in Norway. 相似文献
5.
6.
7.
Liv Langfeldt Bj?rn Stensaker Lee Harvey Jeroen Huisman Don F. Westerheijden 《Higher Education》2010,59(4):391-405
The article analyses the role of peer review within broader external quality assurance schemes. Based on an analytical framework
emphasising that modern quality assurance schemes are designed as a balancing act between standardised guidelines and professional
judgement, the article uses data from a recent evaluation of NOKUT, the Norwegian Quality Assurance Agency, to investigate
whether and how the peer review process has maintained its central role in quality assurance, not least with respect to promoting
excellence and diversity. The findings indicate that what is presented as judgements based on peer expertise, turn out to
be a rather technical process in which pre-defined rigid criteria and standards are imperative. In the conclusion, the role
of peer review is discussed in relation to developments in European higher education. 相似文献
1