首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   1篇
  免费   0篇
教育   1篇
  2011年   1篇
排序方式: 共有1条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1
1.
国婉莉 《海外英语》2011,(5):309-312
With the world becomes closer,the issue of understanding management and culture difference is getting more and more important.The purpose of this research is to find how culture factors impact management style in China and Sweden.The study used Hofstede’s five cultural dimensions,traditional management practice and Denison’s model of organizational culture and effectiveness as framework to identify what different management styles exist between two countries,as well as explain why the difference occurs in term of national culture dimensions and traditional management practice.The interviews were made by five Chinese employees whom have work experiences in China and now are working in Swedish organization in Sweden.From their perspectives,the paper found the dimension of involvement and consistency is significant different between two countries,subsequently,those differences were analyzed by Hofstede’s five culture dimensions,the study found:the small power distance,feminine value and lower uncertainty avoidance as well as lower hierarchy are the reasons of Swedish management style such as high level of agreement,good communication,and high capability development in Sweden.Meanwhile,the large power distance,masculine value,high uncertainty avoidance,guanxi and paternalism style of leadership are the mainly reasons of Chinese management style such like lower level of team orientation,ineffective and lower learning capacity in China.In addition,the long-term orientation cause Chinese organization like to have a long time planning,but the paternalism style of leadership induce the strategy of company departs from the reality.  相似文献   
1
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号