排序方式： 共有3条查询结果，搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.
Ari Wahlstedt Samuli Pekkola Marketta Niemelä 《British journal of educational technology : journal of the Council for Educational Technology》2008,39(6):1020-1030
In this paper, it is argued that e‐learning environments are currently more like ‘buildings’, ie, learning spaces, rather than ‘schools’, ie, places for learning. The concepts originated from architecture and urban design, where they are used both to distinguish static spaces from inhabited places, and more importantly, as design objectives. The transformation from space to place is supported and enabled by social interactions between the (learning) community members. We argue that this distinction between the concepts explains some of the problems with current e‐learning systems and propose issues to consider when designing new systems. By acknowledging the importance and characteristics of a place, designers and researchers can justify the need and support for social interactions in learning space, consequently enabling social community building in e‐learning environments, and most importantly, supporting the development of a user‐friendly and motivating e‐learning place. 相似文献
2.
Bui Phuong Rodríguez-Aflecht Gabriela Brezovszky Boglárka Hannula-Sormunen Minna M. Laato Samuli Lehtinen Erno 《Educational technology research and development : ETR & D》2020,68(5):2395-2421
Educational technology research and development - Serious games for learning have received increased attention in recent years. However, empirical studies on students’ gaming experiences... 相似文献
3.
In this article we focus on the concept of concept in conceptual change. We argue that (1) theories of higher learning must often employ two different notions of concept that should not be conflated: psychological and scientific concepts. The usages for these two notions are partly distinct and thus straightforward identification between them is unwarranted. Hence, the strong analogy between scientific theory change and individual learning should be approached with caution. In addition, we argue that (2) research in psychology and cognitive science provides a promising theoretical basis for developing explanatory mechanistic models of conceptual change. Moreover, we argue that (3) arguments against deeper integration between the fields of psychology and conceptual change are not convincing, and that recent theoretical developments in the cognitive sciences might prove indispensable in filling in the details in mechanisms of conceptual change. 相似文献
1