Spread or Sacrifice: Dilemma for Lighting Policies     

Agnes Brokerhof  Pieter Kuiper  Steph Scholten 《文物保护研究》2018,63(5):28-34

ABSTRACT

Light sensitive objects will fade on display. Collection managers and curators face the dilemma whether to spread fading over several similar objects or sacrifice one. This paper describes an experiment in which participants were asked how they would want to pass on a collection of seventeenth century hand-coloured maps to coming generations. Results show that while colour changes are hardly visible, both public and professionals do not perceive them as damage and prefer to spread fading. Once fading becomes clearly visible in all maps, the preference shifts to sacrificing one map. The tipping point lies around five just noticeable changes. This information can be used when selecting objects for exhibition. The outcome also implies it would be prudent to assess the degree of fading of much exhibited objects and consider whether and when to choose for a sacrifice strategy.  相似文献   

Variation in Valuation: How Research Groups Accumulate Credibility in Four Epistemic Cultures     

Hessels  Laurens K.  Franssen  Thomas  Scholten  Wout  de Rijcke  Sarah 《Minerva》2019,57(2):127-149

Minerva - This paper aims to explore disciplinary variation in valuation practices by comparing the way research groups accumulate credibility across four epistemic cultures. Our analysis is based...  相似文献   

Validation of a free response test of deep learning about the normal swallowing process     

Ingrid Scholten  John P. Keeves  Michael J. Lawson 《Higher Education》2002,44(2):233-255

  相似文献   

Integrating Student Assessment Practices: the significance of collaborative partnerships for curriculum and professional development in a university department     

Bob Smith  Ingrid Scholten  Alison Russell  Paul McCormack 《高等教育研究与发展》1997,16(1):69-86

The purposes and practices of student assessment in all sectors of education are contested. So when the members of a university department decide to collaborate in order to integrate their assessment requirements, what they enter into is a program of personal and collective review that begins to unmask the moral and political dynamics of curriculum and professional development. This article describes such a collaborative project, its processes and its products, as well as the dynamics of collective review as they relate to facilitation, organisational change, and comfortable versus critical collaboration.  相似文献   

The Drawbacks of Project Funding for Epistemic Innovation: Comparing Institutional Affordances and Constraints of Different Types of Research Funding     

Thomas Franssen  Wout Scholten  Laurens K. Hessels  Sarah de Rijcke 《Minerva》2018,56(1):11-33

Over the past decades, science funding shows a shift from recurrent block funding towards project funding mechanisms. However, our knowledge of how project funding arrangements influence the organizational and epistemic properties of research is limited. To study this relation, a bridge between science policy studies and science studies is necessary. Recent studies have analyzed the relation between the affordances and constraints of project grants and the epistemic properties of research. However, the potentially very different affordances and constraints of funding arrangements such as awards, prizes and fellowships, have not yet been taken into account. Drawing on eight case studies of funding arrangements in high performing Dutch research groups, this study compares the institutional affordances and constraints of prizes with those of project grants and their effects on organizational and epistemic properties of research. We argue that the prize case studies diverge from project-funded research in three ways: 1) a more flexible use, and adaptation of use, of funds during the research process compared to project grants; 2) investments in the larger organization which have effects beyond the research project itself; and 3), closely related, greater deviation from epistemic and organizational standards. The increasing dominance of project funding arrangements in Western science systems is therefore argued to be problematic in light of epistemic and organizational innovation. Funding arrangements that offer funding without scholars having to submit a project-proposal remain crucial to support researchers and research groups to deviate from epistemic and organizational standards.  相似文献   

The perceived importance of anatomy and neuroanatomy in the practice of speech—Language pathology          下载免费PDF全文

Kate Martin  Nicola J. Bessell  Ingrid Scholten 《Anatomical sciences education》2014,7(1):28-37

The purpose of this study was to examine the application of anatomy and neuroanatomy knowledge to current practice of speech‐language pathology (SLP), based on the perceptions of practicing SLPs, and to elicit information on participants' experiences of learning these subjects in their primary SLP degree with a view to inform potential curriculum development. A qualitative approach was taken to the collection of data. Eight practicing SLPs from four settings were interviewed. The critical incident technique, together with further probing, was used to elicit information. Interviews were transcribed and later thematically analyzed. This study found that knowledge of anatomy and neuroanatomy was perceived to be important by SLPs across all settings, to varying degrees, with a greater application in acute hospital settings. Negative experiences in studying this material were reported across all settings regardless of country of study. Participants discussed ways to increase students' motivation to learn this challenging material. Relevance of material demanded by students may be enhanced if active learning methods were used to teach anatomy/neuroanatomy, including case‐based learning and with vertical and horizontal integration of material to provide a cohesive, spiral curriculum. Anat Sci Educ. 7: 28–37. © 2013 American Association of Anatomists.  相似文献