排序方式： 共有5条查询结果，搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.
三种学术标签系统的比较分析 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
介绍RefWorks、Connotea和CiteULike三种学术标签系统的主要功能,比较分析三者之间的异同点。通过比较发现RefWorks是较好的书目信息创建工具,Connotea是组织参考文献、发现新线索、与他人共享知识的利器,而CiteLike则是一种组织学术论文的免费在线服务。 相似文献
2.
This article describes the experiences of librarians at the Research Medical Library embedded within clinical teams at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and their efforts to enhance communication within their teams using Web 2.0 tools. Pros and cons of EndNote Web, Delicious, Connotea, PBWorks, and SharePoint are discussed. 相似文献
3.
4.
Yingting Zhang 《Medical reference services quarterly》2013,32(1):45-60
Bibliographic management tools have been widely used by researchers to store, organize, and manage their references for research papers, theses, dissertations, journal articles, and other publications. There are a number of reference management tools available. In order for users to decide which tool is best for their needs, it is important to know each tool's strengths and weaknesses. This article compares four reference management tools, one of which is licensed by University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey libraries and the other three are open source and freely available. They were chosen based on their functionality, ease of use, availability to library users, and popularity. These four tools are EndNote/EndNote Web, Zotero, Connotea, and Mendeley Desktop/Mendeley Web. Each tool is analyzed in terms of the following features: accessing, collecting, organizing, collaborating, and citing/formatting. A comparison table is included to summarize the key features of these tools. 相似文献
5.
Connotea中Social Tagging机制研究 总被引：6，自引：0，他引：6
选取Connotea为研究对象，统计分析标签、被标引资源、标引者两两关联关系，发现标签覆盖资源范围较广，标签共现现象突出，部分用户标引活跃，资源平均标签数较低，用户对内容关注度规律性转移，科研领域的用户比较多地使用规范词。提出增加标引词结构关联和细粒内容定位标引。 相似文献
1