首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Comparison of Select Reference Management Tools
Authors:Yingting Zhang
Institution:1. University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Library of the Health Sciences , Brunswick , New Jersey yzhang@umdnj.edu
Abstract:Bibliographic management tools have been widely used by researchers to store, organize, and manage their references for research papers, theses, dissertations, journal articles, and other publications. There are a number of reference management tools available. In order for users to decide which tool is best for their needs, it is important to know each tool's strengths and weaknesses. This article compares four reference management tools, one of which is licensed by University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey libraries and the other three are open source and freely available. They were chosen based on their functionality, ease of use, availability to library users, and popularity. These four tools are EndNote/EndNote Web, Zotero, Connotea, and Mendeley Desktop/Mendeley Web. Each tool is analyzed in terms of the following features: accessing, collecting, organizing, collaborating, and citing/formatting. A comparison table is included to summarize the key features of these tools.
Keywords:Bibliographic management software  bookmarking tools  citation generators  citation managers  Connotea  EndNote  EndNote Web  Mendeley Desktop  Mendeley Web  reference management tools  reference managers  reference organizers  research tools  Zotero
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号