Undisciplining Knowledge Production: Development Driven Higher Education in South Africa |
| |
| Authors: | Christine Winberg |
| |
| Institution: | (1) Cape Peninsula University of Technology, P O Box 1906, Bellville, 7535, South Africa |
| |
| Abstract: | South African higher education institutions are increasingly under scrutiny to produce knowledge that is more relevant to
South Africa’s social and economic needs, more representative of the diversity of its knowledge producers, and more inclusive
of the variety of the sites where knowledge is produced. Only a small percentage of South Africans are graduates of universities
or technology institutes, and these graduates are not representative of the diversity of the South African population. As
a result there is a shortage of skills to address the country’s reconstruction and developmental needs. This places a burden
on higher education institutions to expand access to their programmes, and to ensure that their programmes are relevant to
the developmental context. Policy makers have found in the Gibbons Gibbons, M., et al. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London Sage Publishers] thesis on ‘Mode 2 knowledge production’ a rationale for the transformation of higher education through
the inclusion of practices which are less abstract, less discipline bound and closer to those processes which characterise
the diversity and distribution of knowledge production in the wider society. Nowotny et al. Nowtony et al. (2001). Re-thinking Science. Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.] have taken Gibbons’ thesis further and have described society itself as becoming increasingly
‘Mode 2’. In a Mode 2 society, differentiation is replaced with integration, and networks of knowledge producers conduct their
work in transdisciplinary teams across widely distributed sites. Such ‘transgressivity’ both pushes knowledge production systems
forward and distributes and diffuses knowledge more widely throughout society. In this paper, it is argued that there is a
need for higher education practitioners to engage critically – and constructively – with the knowledge bases of policy directives
to ensure that the new teaching and learning processes and systems adequately prepare students for the complexity and diversity
of South African society, and enable them to contribute meaningfully to its reconstruction and development. |
| |
| Keywords: | knowledge production transdisciplinarity development globalisation Mode 1/Mode 2 knowledge production relevance experiential learning sustainability |
| 本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录！ |
|
