首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

三种综合评分方法在体育课程评价中的比较研究
引用本文:张雪芬,邱亚玖.三种综合评分方法在体育课程评价中的比较研究[J].湖北体育科技,2006,25(6):679-681.
作者姓名:张雪芬  邱亚玖
作者单位:1. 浙江宁波市北仑长江中学,浙江,北仑,315800
2. 浙江宁波市北仑职业高级中学,浙江,北仑,315800
摘    要:随着我国教育改革的不断深化与发展,"学校体育"课程已率先推出"健康第一"的教育宗旨,因此更提高了对教材教法、师资能力、功能效果等的水平监测与评价要求,故是否能既科学合理、又简便易行地综合评价其质量的各种方法就相应提到了重要的议事日程.文章引用国内、外常用的3种综合评分方法来加以比较探讨,从而为提高体育课程质量评价的科学量化水平提供支撑.

关 键 词:学校体育  课程评价  综合评分  比较研究
文章编号:1003-983X(2006)06-0679-03
收稿时间:06 29 2006 12:00AM
修稿时间:2006年6月29日

The Comparative Research of Three Methods of Comprehensive Evaluation in the P.E. Course Judgment
ZHANG Xue-fen,QIU Ya-jiu.The Comparative Research of Three Methods of Comprehensive Evaluation in the P.E. Course Judgment[J].Journal of Hubei Sports Science,2006,25(6):679-681.
Authors:ZHANG Xue-fen  QIU Ya-jiu
Institution:1. Changiiang Middle School,Beilun,315800,China;2. Beilun Vocational Senior Middle School,Beilun,315800,China
Abstract:As the educational reform increasingly progresses and develops in China,"school P.E." course has taken the first step to pour out the teaching animus of "health first".Therefore,it fourthly improves the request of observing and judging the level about the methods of teaching,the capability of teachers and corporal,and the affection of function,and so on.Thus,the application of all kinds of methods that can comprehensively judge its quality scientifically and in(formally) has been refereed to the discussion schedule.This essay introduces three comprehensive judging ways from(domestic) and abroad to comparatively discuss these things.
Keywords:school P  E    course judgement  comprehensive mark  comparative study
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号