| 从正当性到证成性：一个未完成的范式转换 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 周濂.从正当性到证成性：一个未完成的范式转换[J].华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007,39(6):21-30,37. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 周濂 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国人民大学,哲学系,北京,100872 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 教育部人文社会科学研究基地基金 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 西蒙斯与罗尔斯之间的差异究其根本是洛克主义与康德主义之别,而当代英美政治哲学的主流之所以会混用正当性与证成性,并倾向于把洛克主义的正当性转变为证成性,是因为洛克主义的问题感和方法论被康德主义所取代的缘故,但这是一种尚未完成的范式转换.
|
| 关 键 词： | 正当性 证成性 正义 公民资格 成员资格 |
| 文章编号： | 1000-5579（2007）06-0021-10 |
| 修稿时间： | 2007-09-28 |
From Legitimacy to Justification: An Unfinished Paradigm Shift |
| |
| ZHOU Lian.From Legitimacy to Justification: An Unfinished Paradigm Shift[J].Journal of East China Normal University :Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition,2007,39(6):21-30,37. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHOU Lian |
| |
| Abstract: | A. John Simmons has made a distinction between justification and legitimacy and condemned the confusion of them in John Rawls and some other philosophers. The article argues that the difference between Simmons and Rawls is in essence a difference between Lockism and Kantism. The change of key issue from legitimacy to justification in contemporary political philosophy indicates an unfinished paradigm shift from Lockism to Kantism. |
| |
| Keywords: | legitimacy justification justice citizenship membership |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文 |
