| “问题与主义”论战中的马克思主义中国化 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 彭继红,何为.“问题与主义”论战中的马克思主义中国化[J].湘潭师范学院学报(社会科学版),2002,24(1):32-36. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 彭继红 何为 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 湖南师范大学法学院，湖南长沙410081 |
| |
| 摘 要： | “问题与主义”论战是适应当时探讨现实社会“根本解决”的理论而引发的。它表明了早期马克思主义“惟有一面认定我们的主义，用他作材料，作工具，以为实际的运动；一面宣传我们的主义，使社会上多数人都能用他作材料、作工具，以解决具体问题”的坚定信念。在争论中作为早期马克思主义的李大钊和作为改良主义的胡适的“主张互相发明”，相互影响，相互激荡而又各自调整，不断促使对立面的转化与强大，从而为马克思主义中国化过程开启了实践之门。一个非马克思主义，却点破了马克思主义中国化的先机，虽非他本人所愿，但却是中国思想发展史上的事实。
|
| 关 键 词： | 马克思主义 中国化 “问题与主义” 学术争论 |
| 文章编号： | 1009-4482(2002)01-0032-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2001年2月18日 |
Marxism in Chinese Interpretation - Debates on Issue and Doctrine |
| |
| PENG Ji-hong & HE Wei.Marxism in Chinese Interpretation - Debates on Issue and Doctrine[J].Journal of Xiangtan Normal University(Social Science Edition),2002,24(1):32-36. |
| |
| Authors: | PENG Ji-hong & HE Wei |
| |
| Abstract: | The debate on issue and doctrine was prompted at that time to adjust the theory of complete solution which were discussed in the society. In the debate, the early Marxist Li Da-zhao's and the reformer Hu Shi's claims were interacted and interpenetrated, but at the same time modified respectively. As a result, each claim promoted the transformation and development of the other part, which opened the door for practicing Marxism in Chinese interpretation. As a non-Marxist, Hu Shi bluntly pointed out the omen of Chinese interpretation of Marxism, which was not his own will, but a fact in the history of the development of the Chinese thought |
| |
| Keywords: | issue doctrine complete solution Marxism in Chinese interpretation |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
