首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论文学性与文学传统
引用本文:季中扬.论文学性与文学传统[J].辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版),2007,30(4):94-97.
作者姓名:季中扬
作者单位:淮阴师范学院,中文系,江苏,淮安,223300;扬州大学,文学院,江苏,扬州,225002
摘    要:只有文学性的存在得到确证,文学性理论才能走出相对主义迷误。以往本质主义的论证混淆了“文学”性与文学作品的共性,因而往往陷于困境。这里提出,文学与文学作品之间关系,譬如森林与森林中树木之间关系,森林的特质不是森林中树木的共性,因此,文学性也不是具体文学作品的共性,而是文学整体的特质。由于文学整体具有稳定性,因此,文学性虽然不是实体性的存在,但也不完全由历史语境造成。文学性存在于具体的历史语境与超历史的稳定性二者的张力之间。其具体存在方式可以用维特根斯坦提出的“家族相似性”理论予以说明:文学作品所体现的文学性不是文学作品的同一性,而是某种统一性,因此,我们不可能以归纳思维或分析思维确切地把握它,而只能在文学的具体存在中意会。

关 键 词:文学性  文学传统  家族相似性  本质主义  相对主义
文章编号:1000-1751(2007)04-0094-04
收稿时间:2006-10-20
修稿时间:10 20 2006 12:00AM

A Study of Literariness and Literary Tradition
JI Zhong-yang.A Study of Literariness and Literary Tradition[J].Journal of Liaoning Normal University(Social Science Edition),2007,30(4):94-97.
Authors:JI Zhong-yang
Abstract:Only we prove literariness exist,can the literary theory avoid the mistake of relativism.The former essence doctrine's demonstration confuse the nature of literature and the general character of literary works,thus often sink into the predicament.This thesis proposed that,literariness is not the general character of literary works,but is the special nature of literature itself,just as the forest's nature is not the general character of trees in the forest.The literariness as a whole has stability,therefore,though it doesn't exist stably as an entity,it is not completely from historical context.The literariness exists in the tension between the concrete historical context and the invariability of super history.We may explain literariness by the family-resemblance from Wittgenstein's concept: the literariness represented in literary works is not the identity of literary works,but a kind of unity;therefore,we cannot master it with inductive or analytic methods,but can only comprehend it in the concrete existence of the literature.
Keywords:literariness  literary tradition  family-resemblance  essence doctrine  relativism
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号