The paradoxes of Utopian game-playing |
| |
| Authors: | Deborah P Vossen |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Department of Human Kinetics, St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, Canadadvossen@stfx.ca |
| |
| Abstract: | In The Grasshopper: Games, Life, and Utopia, Suits maintains the following two theses: (1) game-playing is defined as ‘activity directed towards bringing about a specific state of affairs, using only means permitted by rules, where the rules prohibit more efficient in favour of less efficient means, and where such rules are accepted just because they make possible such activity’ and (2) ‘game playing is what makes Utopia intelligible.’ Observing that these two theses cannot be jointly maintained absent paradox, this essay explores the logical possibility that if (2) is true, then (1) must be false. More specifically, in the tradition of conceptual analysis it is argued that Suits’ definition of game-playing is too narrow inasmuch as it excludes really magnificent Utopian games of significance. |
| |
| Keywords: | Utopia significance game-playing paradox conceptual analysis |
|
|
