首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论释道安对老子本体论的承接与改造
引用本文:刘光耀.论释道安对老子本体论的承接与改造[J].襄樊学院学报,2000,21(4):33-36.
作者姓名:刘光耀
作者单位:襄樊学院,中文系,湖北,襄樊,441053
基金项目:1998年湖北省高等学校人文社会科学、软科学研究项目(98S048).
摘    要:释道安对老子本体论的承接有二无为道体,道不可言.他对老子本体论的改造亦有二一,老子之无可以生有,无的本体在先性乃是事实上的;道安之无则不生有,为全然之"空",其在先性乃是逻辑上的.二,老子认为语言虽不能言道,但可言具体事物,仍具一定的实在性;释道安则认为唯有彻底破除语言具实在性的观念,才能见到"真如".

关 键 词:老子  释道安  本体论    
文章编号:1009-2854(2000)04-0033-04
修稿时间:2000年4月11日

On the Continuity and Reformation of Laozi's Ontology by SHI Dao-an
LIU Guang-yao.On the Continuity and Reformation of Laozi's Ontology by SHI Dao-an[J].Journal of Xiangfan University,2000,21(4):33-36.
Authors:LIU Guang-yao
Abstract:There are two points in SHI Dao-an's Continuity of Laozi's Ontology: Taoism comes from nothingness and cannot be explained by concept. There are two points in the reformation of Laozi's ontology as well.1)In Laozi's opinion,creation grows out of nothingness,the priority of Laozi's ontology is a reality, while in Dao-an's opinion, creation cannot grow out of nothingness,and it is absolutely void. The priority of nothingness is in Logic . 2) According to Laozi, word doesn't explain taoism, but refers to real things and it is realistic to some extent . According to SHI Dao-an,only by eradicating the reality of word and adhering to the void of word, can we see the true.
Keywords:Laozi  Shi Dao-an  Ontology  Void  Taoism  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号