| 无差别原则与归纳辩护 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 陈晓平.无差别原则与归纳辩护[J].中山大学学报论丛,2000(2). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 陈晓平 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中山大学逻辑与认知研究所 广东 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 本文作者曾提出两条合理性原则。一是“最少初始概率原则”,用以为主观主义概率归纳逻辑的动态假设进行辩护;二是“试验机制无差别原则”,用以为主观主义概率归纳逻辑的意见收敛定理进行辩护。在本文中,作者将保留前一辩护,而对后一辩护进行两点修正和补充:1.本文对归纳辩护的局部性给以充分的承认,同时对归纳辩护的局部化加以限制,以求局部合理性的最大化。2.对局部归纳辩护的合理性给出一种实用主义的辩护。
|
| 关 键 词： | 归纳 合理性 辩护 无差别原则 概率 |
Indifference Principles and Justifications of Induction |
| |
| CHEN Xiao-ping.Indifference Principles and Justifications of Induction[J].Supplement to the Journal of Sun Yatsen University,2000(2). |
| |
| Authors: | CHEN Xiao-ping |
| |
| Institution: | CHEN Xiao-ping |
| |
| Abstract: | I advanced two principles of rationality in the book. The one is the Principle of Minimum Initial Probabilities, with which the Dynamic Assumption of the subjective probabilistic induction is justified. The other is the Indifference Principle of Trial Setup, with which the Theorem of Opinions' Convergence in the subjective probability theory is justified. In this paper, I'll retain the former justification, and give some correction and supplement to the latter; 1. I'll meantime add a limitation to the local justification in order to maximize the local rationality. This is the point that differentiates my local justification from current local justifications of induction. 2. Going a step further, I'll justify the local justification of induction along the pragmatic line that is originated by H. Reichenbach. |
| |
| Keywords: | induction rationality justification indifference principle probability |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
|
