首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

民事举证责任的经济学解释及启示
引用本文:谌宏伟.民事举证责任的经济学解释及启示[J].赣南师范学院学报,2014(4):83-89.
作者姓名:谌宏伟
作者单位:赣南师范学院政治与法律学院,江西赣州341000
基金项目:赣南师范学院社会科学课题(11kyw02);赣州市社联课题(12251)
摘    要:举证责任的分配是民事证据制度中的核心问题,其与民法上的权利构成要件与权利妨碍要件的界分存在紧密联系。举证责任分配的背后有着经济理性的考量与支撑。我国民法尤其是侵权法领域习惯于采用无条件的举证责任倒置的方法,来化解一些案件当中的受害人对特定事实的证明困境。但从预期举证成本最小化的角度考量,"无条件的举证责任倒置"未必是解决受害人证明困境的妥适方法。证明标准的适当降低或有条件的举证责任倒置也许能更好地解决问题。

关 键 词:民事诉讼  举证责任  经济分析  举证责任倒置

An Economic Approach of the Burden of Proof in Civil Procedure Law
CHEN Hongwei.An Economic Approach of the Burden of Proof in Civil Procedure Law[J].Journal of Gannan Teachers' College(Social Science(2)),2014(4):83-89.
Authors:CHEN Hongwei
Institution:CHEN Hongwei (School of Politics and Law, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou 341000, China)
Abstract:Allocating the burden of proof is the basic issue in civil evidence law,and it’s closely related to the distinction between causes of action and elements of defense. The Civil Law of China,especially the Torts Law,is accustomed to adopting the uncondition-al reversion of burden of proof in order to overcome the dilemma of the aggrieved party to prove certain facts in some cases. But from the perspective of the minimum of the expected evidence cost,it may not be the best option. Properly lowering the standard of proof or re-versing the burden of proof conditionally may be much better.
Keywords:civil procedure  burden of proof  economic analysis  reversion of burden of proof
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号