| 合著者贡献率的国际文献回顾 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王红,王全红.合著者贡献率的国际文献回顾[J].现代情报,2016,36(5):63-70. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王红 王全红 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 大连理工大学图书馆, 辽宁 大连 116024 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金"基于SCI/ESI不同学科人才评价及实证分析"(项目编号:DUT15RW128)。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 本文对合著者贡献率的国际文献进行了回顾,分析了修正Harmonic算法,CCA分配法,夏普里值法,Ab-index以及NBA算法等作者贡献分配率算法的优缺点。结果表明:修正Harmonic算法在评价作者贡献时仅仅区分第一作者,年长作者和其它作者,评价算法相对简单。CCA分配法通过常数K,调整了合著者之间的贡献分配,CCA算法合著者贡献率取值在Fractional和Harmonic算法范围之间。夏普里值法通过界定具体的边际贡献细节确定某一作者在合著中的边际贡献,但计算过程复杂。Ab-index明确区分了第一作者,通讯作者和其它作者的贡献;提出了适合各年龄层次的作者区分度方法,易于操作。NBA算法贡献率分配指数随着学科不同而取不同的值。
|
| 关 键 词： | 合著者 贡献率 文献回顾 Harmonic算法 CCA分配法 夏普里值法 Ab-index |
Review of Contribution of International Co-author Literature |
| |
| Authors: | Wang Hong Wang Quanhong |
| |
| Institution: | Library, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China |
| |
| Abstract: | This paper reviewed the literatures of co-author contribution, and the advantages and disadvantages of Harmonic, CCA, Shapley, Ab-index and NBA methods.Findings showed that Harmonic methods only distinguished the first author, senior author and other authors.This method is relative simple.CCA relocated the contribution level through constant K.Shapley value solution originated from cooperative game theory, and divided benefits from cooperation written by a set of authors.Ab-index clarified the contributions of the first author, corresponding author, and other co-authors and the sharing of credit in a logical ratio.NBA contribution varied across different disciplines. |
| |
| Keywords: | co-authors contribution literature review Harmonic CCA Shapley Ab-index |
|
| 点击此处可从《现代情报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《现代情报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
