| 科技伦理失范原因的撤稿现状分析及其治理策略思考——基于撤稿观察数据库 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 陈咏梅,丛敏,王景周,孙升云.科技伦理失范原因的撤稿现状分析及其治理策略思考——基于撤稿观察数据库[J].科技管理研究,2022(24). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 陈咏梅 丛敏 王景周 孙升云 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 暨南大学学报编辑部,暨南大学学报编辑部,暨南大学学报编辑部,暨南大学学报编辑部 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 中国科学院自然科学期刊编辑研究会(YJH202204)；中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(21622808);广东省高水平科技期刊建设项目 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 首先，调查了撤稿观察数据库（RWD）中截至2022年5月21日因“缺伦理审批”或“无患者知情同意”科技伦理失范（EMSR）论文的发表及撤回（包括撤稿、关注、更正）时间、署名作者来源国家及机构、来源期刊及出版商、学科分布及相关撤回原因等状况；结果显示，近年来全球EMSR原因撤回论文呈上升趋势，且中国作者参与的数量增加明显，95.35%的EMSR撤回论文集中在健康科学和基础生命科学领域。其次，结合科技伦理问题呈现的多样性和复杂性，提出了强化科研活动全流程科技伦理监管策略；最后，作为期刊人，从压实主体责任的视角，提出了科技期刊参与科技伦理协同治理的思考和建议：科技期刊可通过对科研者的伦理宣传教育、投稿论文的协同伦理审查把关以及撤稿惩戒等手段发挥协同共治的作用。
|
| 关 键 词： | 撤回/撤稿 科技伦理 伦理失范 科研诚信 治理 文献计量 |
| 收稿时间： | 2022/10/8 0:00:00 |
| 修稿时间： | 2022/12/14 0:00:00 |
Analysis of the Current Situation of Retraction and its Management Strategy for Reasons of Ethical Misconduct in Scientific Research-- Based on Retraction Watch Database |
| |
| Abstract: | First, we investigated the situation of Ethical Misconduct in Scientific Research (EMSR) withdraw (including Retraction,express of concern and correction) from the Retraction Watch Database (RWD) by the end of 2022 on May 21,the information about the withdrawal papers because of "lack of ethical approval" or "None of patients'' informed consent" were analysed including the published and withdraw date, the authorship , the source countries and organizations, the source journals and publishers, the subject distribution and related withdraw reasons; The results showed that in recent years, the number of withdraw papers due to EMSR was on the rise globally, and the number of Chinese authors'' participation increased significantly. 95.35% of EMSR withdraw were concentrated in the fields of health sciences and basic life sciences. Secondly, according to the diversity and complexity of scientific and technological ethics problems,we puts forward the strategy of strengthening the scientific and technological ethics supervision in the whole process of scientific research activities. Finally, as a journal person, from the perspective of compacting the subject responsibility, this paper puts forward some thoughts and suggestions for sci-tech journals on the participation in collaborative governance of scientific and technological ethics: sci-tech journals can play a role in collaborative governance by means of ethical publicity and education for researchers, collaborative ethical review of submitted papers and punishment the ethical misconduct papers by withdrawal. |
| |
| Keywords: | withdraw /retraction scientific and technological ethics ethical misconduct governance bibliometrics |
|
| 点击此处可从《科技管理研究》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《科技管理研究》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
