| 科技进步法第20条和第21条的立法比较与完善 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 胡朝阳.科技进步法第20条和第21条的立法比较与完善[J].科学学研究,2011,29(3):327-332. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 胡朝阳 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 东南大学法学院，江苏南京 210096 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(09YJA820007) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 结合科技进步法第20条和第21条有关规定，对照美国拜杜法案等有关内容，从比较法角度考察了中国与美国、日本、中国台湾地区、俄罗斯等国(地区)在上述立法模式选择及其制度安排上的异同。比较法制反思表明，我国将国家资助科技项目成果的知识产权保护与转化纳入科技进步法加以调整，其立法模式选择符合创新型国家建设的现实国情，不过其立法制度安排的体系化仍有待进一步推进。在其有关立法模式选择及其制度安排方面既要参照比较法制成果，更要体现本国科研体制及其社会发展需要。在其有关法制建设重心方面既要规范政府介入权行使，更要完善其权利配置机制并培育其知识产权意识。
|
| 关 键 词： | 科技进步法 第20条和第21条 国家资助科技项目 知识产权 立法比较 |
| 收稿时间： | 1900-01-01; |
On the legislation comparison and its perfection of the 20~(th) article and the 21~(th) article of the Law of the People's Republic of China on Science and Technology Progress |
| |
| HU Chao-yang.On the legislation comparison and its perfection of the 20~(th) article and the 21~(th) article of the Law of the People's Republic of China on Science and Technology Progress[J].Studies in Science of Science,2011,29(3):327-332. |
| |
| Authors: | HU Chao-yang |
| |
| Institution: | HU Chao-yang(Law School,Southeast University,Nanjing 210096,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | By combined with the relevant provisions of the 20th article and the 21th article of the law of the People's Republic of China on science and technology progress and compared with the contents of U.S.bayh-dole system,this article studies the differences and similarities in the legislative mode selection and institutional arrangements about China and U.S.,Japan,China Taiwan,Russia and other countries(regions) above-mentioned from the perspective of comparative law.Reflections on comparative law shows that th... |
| |
| Keywords: | the Law of the People's Republic of China on Science and Technology Progress the 20th article and the 21th article IPR the government-funded science and technology project the legislation comparison |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《科学学研究》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《科学学研究》下载免费的PDF全文 |
