排序方式： 共有60条查询结果，搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
张秋 《中国科技资源导刊 (中国信息导报)》2016,(2):67-71
针对当前在新疆企业知识产权管理规范贯彻过程中企业、知识产权中介辅导机构和知识产权管理部门出现
的问题,文章剖析了这些问题产生的原因,提出了贯彻企业知识产权管理规范应遵循市场规律,从引入竞争机制和奖
励机制、选择适合新疆企业的贯彻知识产权管理规范模式、提高知识产权中介辅导机构服务水平、减少政府主导因素
等方面进行创新性工作的方式研究,探索符合新疆企业实际的贯彻知识产权管理规范之路,确保贯彻企业知识产权管
理规范工作取得成效。 相似文献
2.
3.
4.
在经济全球化时代,知识产权成为重要的财富、重要的无形资产,被纳入国民经济核算,成为市场经济发展的重要资源和重要支撑;融入经济发展是知识产权发展的主要趋势,知识产权贸易成为经营的重要形式,知识产权经营成为企业经营的重要内容,知识产权成为市场竞争的重要工具,服务产业的发展亦对知识产权运用提出新的任务;应该从提高国家竞争力的战略高度去强化知识产权意识,防范知识产权风险,防止知识产权滥用,加强自主创新和拥有自主知识产权。 相似文献
5.
In the field of compatibility standards, an increasing number of companies claim to own so-called essential patents (i.e. those patents that are indispensable for designing and manufacturing products conforming to the standard). It is widely believed that the ownership of such patents is a very valuable bargaining tool in cross-license negotiations, while for non-producing firms such patents may result in a substantial stream of licensing revenues. In this paper we study the determinants of essential patent claims in compatibility standards. In particular, we assess the role of two main factors: the significance of the technological solution contained in the patent and the involvement of the applicant of the patent in the standardisation process. We examine the case of W-CDMA, one of the most successful standards in mobile telecommunications. We compare the patents claimed essential for this standard with a control group of randomly selected, unclaimed patents covering the same time period and technology classes. We find empirical evidence that both factors have significant impact on the probability that a patent is claimed as essential, but the involvement in the standardisation process is a stronger determinant than the technical value (‘merit’) of the patent. On the basis of our findings, we offer policy recommendations. 相似文献
6.
结合科技进步法第20条和第21条有关规定,对照美国拜杜法案等有关内容,从比较法角度考察了中国与美国、日本、中国台湾地区、俄罗斯等国(地区)在上述立法模式选择及其制度安排上的异同。比较法制反思表明,我国将国家资助科技项目成果的知识产权保护与转化纳入科技进步法加以调整,其立法模式选择符合创新型国家建设的现实国情,不过其立法制度安排的体系化仍有待进一步推进。在其有关立法模式选择及其制度安排方面既要参照比较法制成果,更要体现本国科研体制及其社会发展需要。在其有关法制建设重心方面既要规范政府介入权行使,更要完善其权利配置机制并培育其知识产权意识。 相似文献
7.
Both China and India have been experiencing a historical take-off in the use of intellectual property rights (IPR). In terms of trademark applications filed with domestic IP offices in 2009, the evidence demonstrates that China now ranks 1st worldwide and India 5th, while for patent filings China ranks 3rd worldwide and India ranks 9th. This performance is remarkable as both China and India experienced negligible demand for IPR protection as recently as two decades ago. The IPR take up trends in these two countries are analyzed in detail, highlighting the structure of patent and trademark demand since 1990. Specifically, the available series are broken down and analyzed according to: (i) national versus foreign origin of patents and trademarks; (ii) technological (IPC) and trademark (NICE) classes; and (iii) the major individual patent users in each country. The data used refers to applications in the Chinese and Indian IP offices although the demand from residents of these two countries in both the international and other national systems is also assessed. Beyond the existing momentum in IPR registrations by China and India and their capacity to maintain it into the near future, the paper addresses practical questions about the strategies, motives and benefits behind the current trends. In particular, we seek to evaluate the capacity of both China's and India's National Innovation Systems to internalize the potential returns of this increasing demand for IPR. The insight reached finds that should both China and India sustain their current IPR growth rates, they will be able to catch up with the most advanced economies within the time span of a few decades. 相似文献
8.
Although China is now the largest patent filing country in the world, research on the duration and outcomes of patent examination remains scarce. In this study, we conduct a replication and extension of Harhoff and Wagner’s (2009) work on the determinants of patent examination duration at the European Patent Office (EPO), using a rich dataset covering the population of about 1.1 million invention patent applications to China’s State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) from 1993 to 2006. By considering all three competing examination outcomes (grant, withdrawal, and refusal) simultaneously, our competing risks analysis replicates many of the results in prior research and confirms that a number of the determinants have differential effects on pendencies for different outcomes. Our analysis also reveals several applicant and application characteristics whose effects on pendencies for specific outcomes differ from prior research. Finally, by incorporating a number of new determinants, we report a set of new findings about their effects on the examination duration for the three outcomes at SIPO. 相似文献
9.
知识产权保护宽度是激励创新企业开展研发投资的主要政策工具,它通过影响知识产权的盈利能力与获取成本,作用于研发企业和受让企业之间的知识产权交易。构建一个两企业、能力非对称的多阶段博弈模型,进行一般均衡分析,结果表明:只有在研发企业的投资支出达到一定规模后,增加保护宽度,才能提高企业收益,激励企业增加研发投资。在既定研发投资下,保护宽度的边际增加将提高技术转让成本,降低受让企业收益和社会福利水平;这一负面效果只有在实现研发投资扩张效应后,才能减缓。因此在增加保护宽度的同时,需要引入辅助措施,如对企业的研发投资采取税收优惠政策、促进企业间知识产权交易等加以协调。 相似文献
10.
浅析经济全球化中滥用知识产权的问题 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
杨飞龙 《福建教育学院学报》2004,5(4):24-28
知识产权的垄断性与经济竞争之间既统一又冲突.经济全球化中的知识产权滥用阻碍了自由贸易与经济合作,引发中外企业知识产权纠纷.应借鉴国外在知识产权领域的反垄断立法与实践,对知识产权滥用的构成和防范等问题进行探讨,学会利用国际规则保护自己. 相似文献