| 责任式创新：“内涵-理论-方法”的整合框架 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 梅亮,陈劲,李福嘉.责任式创新：“内涵-理论-方法”的整合框架[J].科学学研究,2018,36(3):521-530. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 梅亮 陈劲 李福嘉 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 清华大学经济管理学院
2. |
| |
| 基金项目： | 开放条件下建设创新型国家的战略和对策研究;具有中国特色的技术创新战略研究;全球价值链发展变化与我国创新驱动发展战略研究 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 科技创新的负面影响与新兴技术的治理挑战引发研究与政策对“责任式创新”的关注。本文以文献研究为基础，通过责任式创新主题文献的系统回顾，构建“内涵-理论-方法”的整合框架，对责任式创新的概念内涵、共性理论基础、及实践应用方法展开系统评述。研究结论显示：责任式创新的内涵主要围绕内在属性视角、创新过程与管理视角、创新结果评估视角三个方面展开；责任式创新的共性理论基础包括正义论、技术社会控制视角、行动者网络理论、制度理论、创新扩散理论五个分支；责任式创新的典型应用方法涉及扎根研究、伦理分析法、实时技术评估、“谦逊”技术与参与式治理法、上游公众参与技术治理、中游模块化技术治理、技术社会评估等
|
| 关 键 词： | &ldquo 内涵-理论-方法&rdquo 框架 |
| 收稿时间： | 2017-03-01 |
Responsible innovation: An integrated framework of "connotation-theory-approach" |
| |
| Abstract: | The negative impacts of Science, Technology and Innovation (ST&I) and the governance challenges of emerging technologies have triggered concerns on “Responsible Innovation (RI)”, from academia and policy. Based on a comprehensive review of RI literature, this paper establishes an integrated framework of “Connotation-Theory-Approach” for systemically reviewing the connotations, theory foundations, and practical approaches of RI. The results indicate that: connotations of RI derive from three perspectives – intrinsic attribute perspective, innovation process and management perspective, and innovation performance evaluation perspective; theory foundations of RI involve five branches: theory of justice, technology social control perspective, Actor-network Theory, institutional theory, and innovation diffusion theory; and practical approaches of RI refer to: grounded research, ethical analysis, real-time technology assessment, technologies of humility and participation governance, upstream public engagement, midstream modulation of technology governance, and social appraisal of technology. |
| |
| Keywords: | “Connotation-Theory-Approach&rdquo Framework |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《科学学研究》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《科学学研究》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
