| 卢梭论平等与财产的限度--兼论一种基于马克思视角的可能性批判 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 司晓静.卢梭论平等与财产的限度--兼论一种基于马克思视角的可能性批判[J].教学与研究,2020(2):105-112. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 司晓静 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中央财经大学马克思主义学院,北京100081 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 本文系中央财经大学 2018 年度青年教师发展基金项目"马克思政治经济学视阈下的平等思想研究" |
| |
| 摘 要： | 卢梭的私有财产理论以自由和平等的实现为基本导向。围绕这一导向,卢梭既批判私有财产在"坏政府"下导致了严重的社会不平等,又从根本上肯定私有财产是公民自由和平等的基石。在卢梭看来,要想实现其积极作用,私有财产必须在公意的指导下与公共福利相一致。以此为原则,卢梭意义上的私有财产的合理性界限在于:一方面,每个公民都拥有充足的私有财产,以维持个体的独立和自由;另一方面,私有财产的占有应处于相对平等但却并非绝对平均的状态。从马克思的视角来看,卢梭的私有财产理论具有积极意义,但在内容和方法上存在明显的缺陷。
|
| 关 键 词： | 私有财产 平等 自由 公意 |
Rousseau on Equality and the Limits of Property --With a Possible Critique from the Perspective of Marx |
| |
| Si Xiaojing.Rousseau on Equality and the Limits of Property --With a Possible Critique from the Perspective of Marx[J].Teaching and Research,2020(2):105-112. |
| |
| Authors: | Si Xiaojing |
| |
| Institution: | (School of Marxism,Central University of Finance and Economics,Beijing 100081,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Rousseau’s private property theory is basically oriented to freedom and equality. Centering on such an orientation, on the one hand, Rousseau criticizes that private property under the bad government results in severe social inequality;on the other hand, he fundamentally affirms that private property is the cornerstone of citizens freedom and equality. In Rousseau’s view, to play its positive role, private property has to be guided by the general will, and be in accordance with the public good. Taking this as the principle, the rational boundary of private property in Rousseau’s view lies in: on the one hand, each citizen owns enough private property to maintain individual’s independence and freedom;on the other hand, the possession of private property should be in a relatively equal but not absolutely egalitarian state. From the perspective of Marx, Rousseau’s private property theory not only has positive significance, but also defects in content and method. |
| |
| Keywords: | private property equality freedom general will |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
