| 中西目录学比较研究刍议 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 傅荣贤.中西目录学比较研究刍议[J].四川图书馆学报,2009(1):66-70. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 傅荣贤 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 黑龙江大学信息资源管理研究中心,黑龙江,哈尔滨,150080 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 中国近现代目录学是依缘西方学理而建立的，本质上就是“比较”的产物。作为比较的“方法”，与其说是一种行之有效的研究程序或模式，毋宁说是在讨论跨文化目录学比较中碰到的难题，主要包括术语差异问题和文化差异问题两个方面。始自上世纪初的中西目录学比较一开始就与价值立场有关，或“拿来”或拒斥，分别代表了特定时期中国学者对传统文化的不同态度。
|
| 关 键 词： | 目录学 比较 术语 文化 |
Comparative Research on Chinese Bibliography and Western Bibliography |
| |
| FU Rong-xian.Comparative Research on Chinese Bibliography and Western Bibliography[J].Journal of The Sichuan Society for Library Science,2009(1):66-70. |
| |
| Authors: | FU Rong-xian |
| |
| Institution: | FU Rong- xian (Information Resources Management Research Center, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150080, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Chinese modern bibliography originated from comparison between Chinese bibliography and western bibliography. Comparison is one kind of well - established research procedure or model. It works to discuss problems in cross - cultural bibliography research. These problems focus on two aspects, i.e., terminology difference and cultural difference. Since the early 20th century, comparison between Chinese bibliography and western bibliography has been related to researchers＇ values. Different choices such as acceptance and refusal represent Chinese scholars＇ different attitude to traditional culture. From the angle of teleology, comparative research on bibliography should reveal differences between Chinese bibliography and western bibliography. In addition, it should actively participate in modem cultural construetion. |
| |
| Keywords: | bibliography comparison terminology culture |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
