| 刘晶晶.国外开放获取期刊的同行评议方式研究.编辑学报,2017,29(2):200-203 |
| 国外开放获取期刊的同行评议方式研究 |
| Study of peer review modes of abroad open access journals |
| 投稿时间：2016-08-26 修订日期：2016-08-26 |
| DOI：10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2017.02.031 |
| 中文关键词: 开放获取期刊 同行评议 学术质量 |
| 英文关键词: open access journal peer review academic quality |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1289 |
| 全文下载次数: 1166 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 通过网络调研和文献梳理的方式,结合具体案例,如Elsevier、Nature、PLoS、F1000 Research等,对国外开放获取期刊的同行评议方式进行研究。认为结构化同行评议、发表后开放式同行评议以及第三方独立同行评议,各有利弊,应该取长补短,优化评议方式,更好地发挥科技期刊作为学术质量把关者和过滤器的作用。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| In this paper, through network survey and literature review, combined with specific cases such as Elsevier, Nature, PLoS and F1000 Research, we research the peer review modes of abroad open access journals. It is considered that the structured peer-review, open peer review after publishing, and the third party independent peer review, each has advantages and disadvantages, and should complement with each other, and optimize the appraisal modes, so as to play a better role as controller and filter for the quality of academic sci-tech journals. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
