共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 504 毫秒
1.
郭继军 《山西师大学报(社会科学版)》2004,(Z1)
本文在对榆次二中男女生数学学习差异问卷调查的基础上,发现榆次二中高中男女生数学学习存在性别差异,差异主要表现在:智力方面、非智力方面以及教育因素和生活环境方面的差异.并针对高中男女生存在的差异提出了相应的教学策略. 相似文献
2.
刘国生 《长春工业大学学报(高教研究版)》2010,31(2)
在外语学习中,外语学习的性别差异也引起了众多学者的关注.本文通过调查本校的男女生在学习策略、动机与效果方面存在性别差异,进而分析其性别差异对学习策略、动机和效果的影响.我们发现男女生的生理因素、动机因素和忽视性别差异的教学是影响外语水平的主要因素.建议在外语教学中纠正传统性别观念,适当地实施"因性施教",介绍并鼓励学生探索适合自己的学习策略,增强外语学习动机. 相似文献
3.
张新颜 《天津师范大学学报(基础教育版)》2006,7(2):44-47
数学能力性别差异研究对于教材、教法以及课程改革都有十分重要的指导意义。国内外众多学者对数学能力性别差异问题进行了大量的实证研究,一致认为数学学习上存在着性别差异,差异随着年级的升高(例如中学阶段)逐渐增大,特别是高认知水平上的数学学习,男生的优势更加明显。经研究表明,产生性别差异的主要原因包括:心理差异是形成数学能力性别差异的心理机制;社会环境对数学能力性别差异产生潜移默化的影响;教育的影响决定了数学能力性别差异的存在;评价观念的差异是数学能力差异存在的直接原因。 相似文献
4.
国内外数学教育界曾经专门讨论过“性别与数学教育”的问题，有一些美国学者通过对部分小学老师的深入调查分析，认为数学学习上确实存在着性别差异，而且这种差异随年级的升高逐渐增大，越是高认知水平的学习，男生的优秀就越明显。尤其是在数学学习中的差异就更加明显。笔者在实际教学中也确实感觉到男女生在数学学习上的差异，特别是在高中阶段，数学成绩好的女生始终占少数。产生这一差异的原因是什么呢？又应该怎样解决呢？[第一段] 相似文献
5.
性别差异是使用者主体特征差异的基本内容之一,是造成男女生在校园公共空间使用上存在巨大差异的根本原因。本文从性别差异的视角,选取华侨大学泉州校区公共空间作为研究个案,通过问卷调查、访谈、数据统计等研究方法,分别对男女大学生在运动空间、绿色休闲空间、公共厕所和校园安全等使用状况进行实证调研,分析影响男女生使用校园公共空间存在性别差异的主要因素：即行为主体的差异、社会文化的影响和空间规划的忽视等,提出转变两性教育观念、改善性别需求空间、鼓励女生参与规划等空间规划对策,以期改善校园环境中无视性别差异的同一空间,实现男女共享空间资源的权力。 相似文献
6.
学生在数学学习中的性别差异已被众多的理论实验研究实践所证实 ,并逐渐得到我国教育界的认同和重视 .但是这种差异是怎样形成的 ?研究结果并不完全一致 .笔者认为 ,强调数学学习的智力因素固然重要 ,但若忽视非智力因素对数学学习的影响则是片面的 ;智力因素和非智力因素对学生的数学学习同等重要 ,学生的非智力因素的差异和外部因素的不同是造成性别差异的主要原因 .从这一观点出发 ,本文就导致学生数学成绩性别差异的自主性学习行为、内部动机信念等非智力因素进行探讨 ,并针对女生的劣势提出几点对策 .1 非智力因素对数学学习中性别差… 相似文献
7.
8.
《校园英语(教研版)》2016,(18)
我校深入了心理因素对学生成绩的影响因素分析,本文以我校高三的男女生英语成绩的差异初步的得出两性学习的性别差异对学习的影响,特别是在语言学习的影响,我校的研究引起不少教育者学者的关注。性别差异的研究蕴藏着巨大的教育教学潜能。 相似文献
9.
在我们的英语教学实践中普遍存在女生英语学习成绩比男生好这一现象.本文从男女生的心理及智力性别差异研究出发,探讨男女生英语学习差异的原因.然后针对其差异性提出对男女生进行相应教学的措施和方法,从而促进英语教学的发展. 相似文献
10.
在我们的英语教学实践中普遍存在女生英语学习成绩比男生好这一现象.本文从男女生的心理和生理性别差异研究出发,探讨男女生英语学习差异的原因.然后针对其差异性提出对男女生进行相应的教学策略.从而促进英语教学的发展. 相似文献
11.
不同性别儿童数学学习情感发展差异研究 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
文章研究了小学儿童数学学习的情感发展特征,采用自编"儿童数学学习情感发展水平"量表,以梅州市三所小学1-6年级共860名学生为被试,考察男女生数学学习情感发展水平的差异。结果表明:(1)小学男、女生的数学学习情感发展水平存在极显著差异,女生数学学习情感发展水平明显比男生高。(2)除师生关系水平存在显著的性别差异,女生比男生与老师有更良好的师生关系外,儿童数学学习情感的其他因素,男、女几乎没有不同。(3)低年级儿童的数学学习情感发展水平存在显著的性别差异,中、高年级儿童不存在显著的性别差异,数学学习情感发展水平随年级升高而降低,女生数学学习情感发展水平变化较大,男生则相对平稳。 相似文献
12.
The purpose of the present study was to examine gender differences in mathematics interest. In a sample of middle school students (N?=?366), we examined mathematics interest as a trait (i.e., individual interest) and as a current state (i.e., situational interest) during a learning activity in mathematics. Assessment of perceived competence, performance, and effort during learning was also included. Results revealed a significant difference between boys and girls in their ratings of individual interest, but not in the current experience of situational interest. Furthermore, boys and girls did not differ in performance during learning, but girls invested significantly more effort than boys. Results and their implications are discussed in relation to interest development, gender differences, and subjective beliefs. 相似文献
13.
This paper presents findings from research exploring gender by item difficulty interaction on mathematics test scores in Cyprus. Data steamed from 2 longitudinal studies with 4 different age groups of primary school students. The hypothesis that boys tended to outperform girls on the hardest items and girls tended to outperform boys on the easiest items was generally supported for each year group. The effect of social class was also examined. For each social class, there was a correlation between the item difficulty differences estimated on girls and boys separately and the difficulty of the item estimated on the whole sample. It is claimed that in understanding gender differences in mathematics, item difficulty should be treated as an independent variable. Suggestions for further studies are provided, and implications for the development of assessment policy in mathematics are drawn. 相似文献
14.
钟君 《天津师范大学学报(基础教育版)》2014,(4):64-67
数学学习的性别差异一直是人们关心的问题。PISA 2012测评结果显示,虽然天津男生与女生数学学习成绩不存在差异,但男女生数学学习的驱动力、动机和自我信念还是有明显差异。与男生相比,女生学习的坚持性、问题解决的开发性、对自身解决数学问题能力的自信更差,而数学焦虑更强,更倾向于将数学学习失败的责任归咎于自身以外的因素。 相似文献
15.
The Dutch gender gap in mathematics: Small for achievement, substantial for beliefs and attitudes 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
In general, studies on gender and mathematics show that the advantage held by boys over girls in mathematics achievement has diminished markedly over the last 40 years. Some researchers even argue that gender differences in mathematics achievement are no longer a relevant issue. However, the results of the Trends in Mathematics and Science Study of 2003 (TIMSS-2003), as well as the participation rates of girls in (advanced) mathematics courses, show that in some countries, such as the Netherlands, gender equity in mathematics is still far from a reality. Research on gender and mathematics is often limited to the relationship between gender differences in attitudes toward mathematics and gender differences in mathematics achievement. In school effectiveness research, theories and empirical evidence emphasize the importance of certain school and class characteristics (e.g., strong educational leadership, safe and orderly learning climate) for achievement and attitudes. However, there is little information available at to whether these factors have the same or a different influence on the achievement of girls and boys. This study used the Dutch data from TIMSS-2003 to explore the relationship between school- and class characteristics and the mathematics achievement and attitudes for both girls and boys in Grade 4 of the primary school. The explorations documented in this paper were guided by a conceptual model of concentric circles and involved multilevel analyses. Interaction effects with gender were assessed for each influencing factor that turned out to have a significant effect. The results of these analyses provide additional insight into the influence that non-school-related and school-related factors have on the mathematics achievement and attitudes of girls and boys. 相似文献
16.
Males are often found to outperform females in tests of mathematics achievement and it has been proposed that this may in part be explained by differences in cognitive style. This study investigated the relation between Wholistic-Analytic and Verbal-Imagery cognitive style, gender and mathematics achievement in a sample of 190 Australian primary school students aged between 8–11?years (M?=?9.77, SD?=?1.05). It was hypothesised that males would outperform females in mathematics achievement tests, and that gender would interact with cognitive style on mathematics performance. A significant gender/cognitive style interaction was found. Boys with an Analytic/Imagery style achieved significantly higher results than the girls with an Analytic/Imagery style, supporting the contention that certain cognitive styles affect boys and girls mathematics performance differently. Implications of results and strategies for improving mathematics achievement among girls are discussed. 相似文献
17.
Bent Sortkær 《School Effectiveness & School Improvement》2013,24(4):511-528
ABSTRACTClassroom disciplinary climate has emerged as a crucial factor with regard to student achievement. However, most previous studies have not explored potential gender differences in both students’ perceptions of the classroom disciplinary climate and the association between classroom disciplinary climate and student learning. Using data from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2012 for the Nordic countries, we found a significant association between the perceived classroom disciplinary climate of schools and students’ mathematics performance across countries. On the basis of an analysis of a pooled sample consisting of all 5 Nordic countries, we found that the correlation between classroom disciplinary climate of schools and maths achievement is significantly stronger for boys than for girls. Further analyses showed that this finding may partly be attributable to gender differences in the perception of the disciplinary climate of schools, whereby boys seemed to perceive the classroom disciplinary climate of schools more positively than girls. 相似文献
18.
Helen Forgasz 《Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education》2006,9(5):437-469
The findings presented in this article were derived from a 3- year study aimed at examining issues associated with the use of computers for secondary mathematics learning in Victorian (Australia) schools. Gender and other equity factors were of particular interest. In this article, the focus is on the participating mathematics teachers. Data on their perceived competence levels with technology, and their use of and beliefs about computers for their male and female students’ mathematics learning were gathered. A clear majority of teachers felt comfortable about, and did use, computers for teaching mathematics, and believed that computers helped students’ mathematical learning. Generally, the teachers considered boys to be more confident and capable than girls with computers. The results have implications for pre-service education programs and for the professional development of practicing secondary mathematics teachers.Various findings included in this article have been presented at a range of mathematics education conferences including: AAMT (2003), MAV (2003), and ICME 10 (2004). 相似文献
19.
20.
黄秋香 《贵州教育学院学报》2009,25(12):43-46
以数学学习兴趣（I）和学习能力（J）两个指标针对高中三个年级的数学学习现状进行调查表明：1）年级因素、性别因素以及年级和性别的交叉因素对数学学习的状况非常明显的影响,年级对学习兴趣和学习能力均有显著的影响,而性别只对学习能力有影响,对学习兴趣无显著影响。2）随着年级的升高,男、女生的数学学习兴趣和学习能力都随之发生显著地变化,男生的学习兴趣和学习能力随着年级的增加而增强,因此高三男生的数学学习兴趣和能力最高;高一年级女生的学习兴趣最低,而高三女生的学习兴趣和学习能力都高于高一、高二年级。3）通过年级因素的多重比较发现,在学习兴趣方面,高二、高三无显著差别,且均高于高一;在学习能力方面,均存在非常显著的差异,且高三最高,高二次之,高一最低。 相似文献