首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 46 毫秒
1.
COUNTER was formally launched in March 2002. Within a year Release 1 of the COUNTER Code of Practice had been published, and a number of leading publishers were working towards making their usage reports COUNTER‐compliant. This article describes the background to COUNTER, the main features of the Code of Practice, the current status of its implementation and the next steps for the project. It also stresses the particular benefits to publishers of COUNTER compliance and of COUNTER membership.  相似文献   

2.
Project Counting Online Usage of Networked Electronic Resources (COUNTER) released its first code of practice in 2002. Standardized Usage Statistics Harvesting Initiative (SUSHI) was introduced in 2007 as a way of automating the harvesting of COUNTER reports. Both initiatives have been well adopted yet there is still confusion about how to implement SUSHI. This column offers a primer for library staff wanting to take advantage of the benefits of SUSHI. It starts with a quick review of both COUNTER and SUSHI, then covers options for SUSHI clients, examines SUSHI configuration requirements, demonstrates how to use SUSHI to obtain a COUNTER report and shows an example of working with a COUNTER Journal Reports in Extensible Markup Language (XML) format to create a spreadsheet with a simple cost-per-use and package analysis. By the end the reader should gain enough knowledge to configure a SUSHI client, successfully harvest COUNTER statistics and to perform some basic analysis on that usage.  相似文献   

3.
COUNTER Release 5旨在应对不断变化的电子资源,提供可靠、一致和可对比的使用统计数据。文章分析了COUNTER Release 5的规范并探索其在中国高校图书馆数字资源采购联盟(DRAA)中的应用。研究发现,与COUNTER Release 4相比,Release 5有了明显的变化,包括定义了全新的报告体系、统计指标类型、RESTful SUSHI接口等技术细节。为在DRAA中应用COUNTER Release 5,需要从两个方面改进:一是让统计模块兼容COUNTER Release 5的数据模型,使COUNTER Release 5的统计数据可以融入现有的统计模型;二是需要新增RESTful SUSHI接口的客户端及文件解析器,让系统可以获取并解析到COUNTER Release 5的报告。  相似文献   

4.
5.
Since its inception in 2002, COUNTER has given hope to many librarians charged with collecting usage data for their online collections. This hope turned to optimism in 2007 with the release of SUSHI (Standardized Usage Harvesting Initiative) as a NISO standard (Z39.93). In 2009 release 3 of the COUNTER Code of Practice for Journals and Databases takes effect and with it are some significant advances that will turn hopes and optimism into realities. This article describes the changes and their implications.  相似文献   

6.
本文通过对比COUNTER第四版与第三版,发现第四版在如下方面具有很多新特征。在文档结构上,使用一个规范代替原来的两个规范;在术语及测量指标方面,新增"金色开放获取"、"多媒体全文内容单元"、"记录浏览"、"结果点击"等术语;在数据元素上,新增数字对象标识符、所有权标识符及机构标识符;在使用报告上,新增开放获取文章的使用统计报告、多媒体资源使用报告及基于移动设备的使用报告,并对原有报告做了不少调整;在审核上,新增对SUSHI协议遵循情况的审核。未来的COUNTER将继续探索与SUSHI的结合应用,探索新的期刊测量指标,增加文章级的使用评价指标。  相似文献   

7.
A four hour post-conference workshop was offered on Counting Online Usage of Networked Electronic Resources (COUNTER) statistics with the goal of providing participants with hands-on experience working with and manipulating statistics. Best practices and methods were also discussed.  相似文献   

8.
COUNTER与电子资源的使用评估   总被引:8,自引:0,他引:8  
概括介绍COUNTER的实施规范及其统计机理,详细阐述COUNTER的统计内容、统计方法、报告的交付等,并结合国家图书馆电子资源的订购情况,对不同电子资源系统的统计功能进行比较。  相似文献   

9.
COUNTER体系已经成为网络化电子资源使用统计报告数据处理的国际化标准。文章以COUNTER数据为基础,从用户登录与检索、使用偏好、门户进入方式、使用成本和文献学科需求等方面对SDOL数据库的使用情况进行分析,反映用户对SDOL的使用特点和学科需求,探索如何更为科学合理地建设电子资源,以优化图书馆资源结构,提升信息服务质量,提高SDOL数据库的使用效率。  相似文献   

10.
The Counting Online Usage of Networked Electronic Resources (COUNTER) Code of Practice and Standardized Usage Statistics Harvesting Initiative (SUSHI) are two standards whose successful adoption will greatly assist librarians in performing accurate and timely usage analysis of their online collections and thus make more informed collection management decisions. Variations in how these standards have been applied by content providers to their SUSHI and COUNTER implementation are currently impacting their widespread adoption. The standards themselves are not broken—what is needed is concise guidelines on their implementation. This column reviews some of the roadblocks that impede consistent implementation of these standards as well as proposes recommendations that could form the basis of a community profile for these standards.  相似文献   

11.
在电子资源利用统计领域具有较大影响的COUNTER规范发布了第五版,探讨其变化、特征及应用趋势,可为图书馆优化电子资源管理提供借鉴。文章从体系结构、报告要素及实施维护等方面对规范的新旧版本进行系统对比,解读关键变化及作用;结合新规范的特性,讨论可能的创新应用场景。新规范具有清晰的体系结构和易于扩展的报告模型,实现了简单性与灵活性的统一。新规范整合了指标定义并细化用户资源访问行为的统计粒度,增强了用户行为统计的一致性。新规范的实施可支撑图书馆开展电子资源利用指标验证和用户行为分析研究,推动研究数据集等领域资源利用统计的标准化,可为我国相关标准的制定与维护提供参照。  相似文献   

12.
电子资源评估及COUNTER体系简介   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
近年来,图书馆资源建设逐渐向电子资源倾斜,对电子资源的评估就成为图书馆工作一项重要内容。分析了当前国外诸多全文或文摘型数据库提供使用报告中共同遵守的COUNTER体系,一方面帮助图书馆员理解电子资源使用报告,给决策以帮助,另一方面希望藉此推动国内数据库服务商在这方面的工作。  相似文献   

13.
This column provides a preview of what is being discussed for inclusion in release 4 of the Counting Online Usage of NeTworked Electronic Resources (COUNTER) code of practice. We will look at the rationale behind the proposed new reports, changes being considered for the processing guidelines and updated audit expectations.  相似文献   

14.
Since its first Code of Practice was published in 2003, setting the first international standard for reporting usage of scholarly content, Counting Online Usage of Networked Electronic Resources (COUNTER) has been continually refining the code of practice to meet the evolving needs of its library, publisher, and vendor membership. The latest release of the Code of Practice went into effect in early 2014 and introduced several improvements over the prior releases. Work is now underway on Release 5 of the COUNTER Code of Practice with a promise that it will provide further improvements to better report on usage of scholarly information in an ever-changing discovery and access environment. This column discusses current challenges and how Release 5 might address them.  相似文献   

15.
Established in 2014, Usus (Latin for usage), supported by Counting Online Usage of NeTworked Electronic Resources (COUNTER), but editorially independent, is a community-run website designed to provide a space for librarians, consortia, publishers, aggregators, repository managers, and scholars to discuss all aspects of usage, including particular ways that use is measured. In this session, Usus Supervisory Board members provided an introduction to Usus, outlined the purpose of the community-run site, and discussed how librarians may utilize the site to submit ongoing and complex usage issues. In addition, the presenters engaged attendees in discussing specific e-resource usage issues they have encountered as well as report changes and additions in the recently released COUNTER Code of Practice 4.  相似文献   

16.
17.
COUNTER--网络化电子资源使用统计的新标准   总被引:20,自引:2,他引:18  
自《COUNTER实施规范》于2002年3月发布以来,已为越来越多的出版商所采用,作为规范电子资源利用统计数据的采集、报告和传递的标准,图书馆有了更可靠、稳定的依据来评价和比较本馆电子资源的价值和使用情况。文章详细介绍了该规范的起源、核心内容及其发展动向。  相似文献   

18.
In September 2010 MPS Limited undertook a short survey of librarians, addressing their use of usage statistics. Over 300 librarians responded. This article covers the findings. 97% of the librarians surveyed use usage statistics in some way. As would be expected, they find COUNTER‐compliant usage statistics invaluable and place their importance above non‐COUNTER‐compliant usage data. They also rely on this information as a major part of the decision‐making process when it comes to purchase and cancellation decisions.  相似文献   

19.
In 2005, SUSHI became the latest buzzword in the library community. This article (and this kind of SUSHI) refers to usage data, not raw fish. The growth of online collections has resulted in libraries demanding that publishers provide detailed usage data to allow them to better manage their collections and purchases. The Project COUNTER Code of Practice was created in response to this need; however, it did not address the painstaking task of collection and management of the usage data. SUSHI is a new protocol developed to allow for automated retrieval of COUNTER usage reports from publishers and other content providers.  相似文献   

20.
Knowledge Base and Related Tools (KBART), initially founded with a focus on improving OpenURL linking through the definition of best practices for exchanging title-level metadata, continues to gain traction and has the potential to be an initiative that improves not only link resolver quality but also improves discovery services, electronic resource management (ERM) systems, and even Counting Online Usage of Networked Electronic Resources (COUNTER) usage reports. In this column we quickly review the history of KBART from its inception in 2007 through the creation of the Phase 1 and Phase 2 best practices. Then we investigate how KBART can positively influence the quality of discovery services, ERM systems, and COUNTER. Finally, we put forward some suggestions on how KBART can become the key to standardizing the exchange of holdings data within the information supply chain to address needs beyond link resolvers and eliminate some redundant holdings maintenance tasks in libraries.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号