共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 140 毫秒
1.
新华社媒体大脑宣告了MGC视频新闻全程智能化生产时代的到来.以声音和画面为基本传播手段的MGC视频新闻应当从电视新闻中汲取有益的专业规范.经过多次论争后,合一和对位被认为是视频新闻最常见的两种声画关系.视频新闻传播实践不断挑战着视频的声画关系理论,轻视视频新闻画面内容的真实性,降低视频新闻视听表达的专业化,忽略视频新闻本体的艺术性,视频新闻声画关系在新闻传播实践中有所变异.传统视频新闻所面临的真实性、专业性和艺术性等基本问题,是MGC视频新闻构建基本生产规范时首要解决的问题. 相似文献
2.
本文通过对独立战争后、美国建国初期的政治环境分析,试图探析杰斐逊与汉密尔顿关于新闻自由思想的论争以及造成二者思想差异的原因,在此基础上,深化对新闻自由的认识。同时,杰斐逊与汉密尔顿关于新闻出版自由的思想论争,也把两种互相矛盾的思想植入美国的新闻思想史。 相似文献
3.
分析规范控制对FRBR目录实现的重要影响和FRBR、FRAR思想对规范工作提出的新要求,重点从规范控制的角度探讨了国内实现FRBR化目录的难点和障碍。并对中文文献资源的规范控制工作的发展提出了一些看法和建议。 相似文献
4.
三、印刷职业道德规范职业道德规范是指在一个具体的职业领域内,调整、约束、评价从业人员思想和行为好坏与善恶的标准。由此可见,要在职工队伍中进行职业道德教育,制定必要的、适合本行业的职业道德规范势在必行。
相似文献
5.
马恩经典著作的引用对于学术规范及学术活动具有现实意义。结合马恩等经典著作在思想政治教育学术文本中的引用实际,探讨学术研究的学术性和规范性,加强学术研究者与学术出版者的信息对接,集中讨论强调引用规范的必要性及其内涵,并从学术研究者、学术出版者和建立标准的角度,提出引用规范之策。 相似文献
6.
鲁迅是20世纪中国伟大的思想家与文学家,堪称中国的民族魂。关于他的论争从来就没有停止过,新时期以来,在鲁迅研究领域更是发生了频繁的论争。这固然是因为鲁迅及其著作这一研究客体,即鲁迅思想的深刻 相似文献
7.
建立文献数据库规范控制的探讨 总被引：7，自引：0，他引：7
曾海燕 《现代图书情报技术》1997,13(1):51-54
本文论述了文献数据库规范档的概念和规范控制的原理, 讨论了规范库与文献数据库的关系, 介绍了GDPS 系统规范控制的实现。 相似文献
8.
本文以《主题规范款目和参照款目指南》为依据,分别对中文主题规范档中规范款目等的著录项目及格式、著录内容及规则,以及规范档与书目档的连接方式及组织进行了论述。 相似文献
9.
10.
规范格式一体化的利弊分析 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
概述规范控制和规范格式的定义、我国规范控制的发展过程和现状以及规范格式的选取原则。重点针对CALIS联机编目中心提出的规范格式一体化可能带来的问题进行深入分析,提出为更快更好地做好我国的规范工作,规范格式不宜一体化,而是中文文献规范记录宜采用CNMARC规范格式,西文文献规范记录宜采用MARC21/A格式。 相似文献
11.
Merging our work as grassroots activists and scholars, we map the master tropes of contemporary arguments both for and against the death penalty. This rhetorical work is preceded by analyses of who uses the death penalty and why, noting especially the overlap between lynching and capital punishment; the status of exonerations, moratoriums, and contested scientific evidence; and recent court cases affecting executions. In addition to providing this informational overview of, and rhetorical road map to, debates about executions, we argue that each master trope suggests useful political strategies for advocating against the death penalty. 相似文献
12.
Mary Ann Renz 《Communication Studies》2013,64(3-4):166-180
Previous research has suggested that different nations use different argumentative forms and may think differently. This examination of the arguments used in three United Nations Security Council debates contradicts this conclusion. The study found that the nature of data and the relative emphasis on principle as a negotiating strategy were more characteristic factors. 相似文献
13.
Randall L. Bytwerk 《Communication Studies》2013,64(2):187-198
During the SST controversy old arguments were losing force and new ones were developing. As in other recent technological debates, SST proponents raised charges of environmental catastrophe which were most difficult to disprove, while SST proponents made serious errors in analyzing their audience. We have not yet learned how to conduct effctive public discussion of scientific issues. 相似文献
14.
Marouf Hasian Jr. 《Communication Studies》2013,64(3-4):299-319
This essay provides a close textual examination of the historic debates that took place in the mid‐1980s between former Attorney General Edwin Meese and former Supreme Court Justice William Brennan. These debates offered listeners contrasting positions on such politically and socially divisive issues as affirmative action, habeas corpus review, abortion, and reproductive rights. This essay utilizes some of the tools of genre criticism to explicate and defend the claim that the constitutional arguments advanced in the speeches of Meese and Brennan were presented in the form of “jeremiads” that had the potential to restrict or expand the range of policy alternatives available in coping with complex jurisprudence problems. The overarching goal of this essay is to improve our understanding of legal rhetoric in general and the judicial jeremiad in particular. 相似文献
15.
New media technologies are often met with political and public ambivalence, as they are perceived to threaten established activities, values and institutions, as well as bring progress and improve political, cultural and social life. Taking the Norwegian history of television as an empirical case study, this article relates to an international research agenda focusing on the cultural political debates in the early phases of broadcast media. The article is structured according to five key conjunctures where significant new media and technologies were introduced with corresponding political debates: the introduction of television (1940s–1950s), of colour television (1960s–1970s), of satellite, cable and commercial television (1980s), of digital distribution (1990s–2000s) and the expansion of television to new platforms (2000s). The article addresses the key arguments and dividing lines in these political debates, as well as the change in the perception of television when the medium is no longer new, but has become an integrated part of people's everyday life. 相似文献
16.
Wilson P. Dizard 《广播与电子媒介杂志》2013,57(3):195-196
In the United States we cannot avoid the impact of television on domestic politics. On all sides, every election year, we are buffeted by such developments as the “great debates,” “pre‐election predictions” by computers, arguments over Sec. 315, and various partisan uses of TV. Overseas, many nations have experienced the political effects of television, some similar and some more subtle than our own. 相似文献
17.
Michael Pfau 《Journal of Applied Communication Research》2013,41(2):99-101
This study examined issue learning outcomes in three intra‐party political debates during the 1984 campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination. The results indicated that intra‐party political debates produce significant viewer learning (1) about the issue positions of each participating candidate, (2) about most issues, and (3) among all categories of viewers. In addition, the study found that intra‐party political debates produce distinct outcomes, including: variation in learning between debates about candidate positions on particular issues; significant increases in learning about the positions of the Democratic candidates on the part of Democratic, Republican, and nonaffiliated viewers; and a negative effect on viewer knowledge about nonparticipating incumbent Ronald Reagan's positions on the issues. 相似文献
18.
《Communication monographs》2012,79(3):333-342
This author is in general agreement with the arguments in Bostrom's () essay concerning theory–data interaction. Nevertheless, an examination of the issues raised in the essay from the standpoint of scientific realism lead to two different conclusions. First, the opening rationale is based on a nondefensible distinction between empiricists and interpretivists. Second, debates among paradigms are based on real ontological and epistemological differences, and the scientific realist's view of theory–data interaction accepts the validity of these differences. 相似文献
19.
《Communication monographs》2012,79(4):265-273
The nomination of Dwight Eisenhower as standard‐bearer of the Republican Party in 1952 was largely determined by decisions made in the Credentials Committee of the convention. The committee heard arguments from several southern states which had sent conflicting sets of delegates. The debates on these contests provide fertile soil for the analysis of speeches in a situation fraught with tension and singleness of purpose; a situation in which the reward for successful debating was the ultimate control of the Republican Party. This paper analyzes four of the major debates staged by the states of Texas, Florida, Louisiana, and Georgia. The conclusion examines the power relations within these contests and the extent to which the power struggle affected their outcome. Two hypotheses of interest to the rhetorician are inferred from this examination. 相似文献
20.
Lawrence SOUDER 《Learned Publishing》2011,24(1):55-72
This review summarizes the literature of a subset of the published research and commentary on peer review – the ethics of peer review. It attempts to track the various ethical issues that arise among the key participants in peer‐review systems: authors, editors, referees, and readers. These issues include: bias, courtesy, conflict of interest, redundant publication, honesty, transparency, and training. It concludes that debates over such issues as open vs. blind reviews continue unresolved but that new technologies offer some prospects for resolving old issues while they also may create new challenges. 相似文献