共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 156 毫秒
1.
英国学Fiona Yarrow和Keith J.Topping创立的配对写作模式，是一种非常灵活的结构性合作写作体系，它以整合元认知和社会互动的方法支持学生的写作发展。其中，带有元认知支持的配对写作流程图，不仅能有效地提高学生的写作成绩，而且能激发写作兴趣，增强自信心及自我效能感，培养协作精神，因此，该研究具有较高的理论意义和实践价值，是一项极具创新的作教改实验，值得我们研究与借鉴。 相似文献
2.
元认知策略运用于英语写作教学的实证研究 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
刘基绍 《中国校外教育(理论)》2009,(5)
如何提高英语写作教学效果是我国当前高等教育的一大难题.本文通过教学试验研究,在英语写作教学中融入元认知策略训练,探讨通过培养学生的元认知能力是否能有效提高写作教学效果.研究结果表明,在英语写作教学中融入元认知策略训练能使学生的元认知能力和自主学习能力明显增强,英语写作水平得以快速提高. 相似文献
3.
4.
元认知与“体验英语写作”教学的研究 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
元认知是对已有认知的再认知和重新审视;是计划、监控和评价学习过程的部分。写作中元认知体现在学生要解读老师对写作的认知和老师要解析学生对写作的理解。“体验英语写作”注重理论与实践融为一体,通过参与型、互动式、过程化的教学方式,帮助学生了解英语写作机制,拓宽认知视野,改变思维定式。本文探讨元认知与英语写作教学问的共核关系,分析用元认知理论指导体验英语写作教学的策略和模式。对元认知理论和体验英语写作的研究能帮助教学双方更深入地理解写作,提高英语写作水平。 相似文献
5.
本文通过对学生写作成绩对比实验研究,以探讨在大学英语写作教学中融入元认知策略训练是否能有效提高大学生的英语写作教学效果。研究结果表明,在英语写作教学中融入元认知策略训练教学效果显著,学生的元认知能力和自主学习能力明显增强,英语写作水平得到快速提高。 相似文献
6.
《陕西教育学院学报》2019,(3):97-100
通过教学实验,论文调查了网络写作环境下,高职英语专业学生写作元认知策略使用情况,并指出高职英语专业学生写作元认知策略使用情况与写作成绩间有密切关系。同时,实验还证实了在高职英语写作教学中融入在线英语写作平台,不仅可以改善了学生的写作总元认知策略以及其中的选择注意、自我监控和自我评价三个策略维度(然而,事先计划这一策略维度不能在平台中得到改善),还能有效提高学生的写作成绩。 相似文献
7.
8.
英语写作是高职英语教学的重要环节。元认知是对认知的认知,它包括元认知知识、元认知体验和元认知监控。文章介绍了元认知理论,分析了英语写作元认知的研究现状,并试图将元认知理论运用于英语写作的各个阶段中,提出一些具体的做法以提高学生的英语写作水平。 相似文献
9.
元认知策略是是学习者通过计划、监控及评估等方法对认知过程进行自我管理的策略,有效使用元认知策略是自主学习能力的核心。对学生进行元认知策略的介入性培训,有助于提高自主学习能力。目前,国内的研究仅针对英语专业或非英语专业的学生,还未有对英语专业双学位学生的介入性研究。本文对57名英语专业双学位学生进行一学期的写作元认知策略培训,定量分析显示,学生的写作成绩得到提高,同时运用写作元认知策略的频率也增加了;定性分析显示,元认知策略训练有助于提高写作方面自主学习意识。 相似文献
10.
胡莎 《中国科教创新导刊》2011,(28):132-133
元认知是指人们了解,控制和监控自己认知活动的能力。本文根据元认知理论框架,提出了在大学英语写作教学中培养学生元认知能力的教学方法。写作教学中,教师启发学生获得并掌握正确的元认知知识,加强学生对写作认知策略的认识,丰富学生的认知体验,不仅匏帮助学生了解写作过程,还能培养学生独立解决问题和客观评价自我的能力,促进学生积板,主动、有效地学习,不断提高英语写作水平。 相似文献
11.
谭晓春 《湖南第一师范学报》2010,10(6):61-66,109
大学英语写作动机、写作策略与写作成绩的相关分析和路径分析的结果表明：学生的英语写作成绩与写作动机、写作策略的三大维度,即元认知策略、认知策略和社会/情感策略,都具有显著的线性相关;在英语写作策略中,元认知策略对写作成绩的影响最大;写作动机不仅对写作策略有直接影响,而且还通过写作策略对写作成绩产生间接影响。 相似文献
12.
本研究对哈尔滨师范大学阿城学院英语专业二年级38名学生进行了为期一年的以元认知策略训练为基础的任务写作教学。数据分析结果表明:该培训增强了学生的元认知意识,不但对学生写作水平有直接的影响,而且还通过影响英语语言水平对其施加间接影响。 相似文献
13.
Jiening Ruan 《Literacy》2004,38(2):106-112
This study investigates metacognitive development of 16 bilingual Chinese/English first‐graders. The researcher analysed the metacognitive utterances produced by the children while they were engaged in the writing task of composing dictated stories. The results suggest that the young bilinguals demonstrated metacognitive abilities and were able to employ metacognitive knowledge during their writing attempts. There is also indication that metacognition is closely connected to these children's ability to compose stories and the qualities of their stories. 相似文献
14.
郭晓丽 《深圳信息职业技术学院学报》2012,10(2):48-51
本文以135名高职英语专业学生为研究对象,采用问卷调查的方法调查高职英语专业学生英语写作策略使用情况。研究表明：补偿策略和记忆策略的使用频率最高,不同年级、性别的受试者在写作策略使用上没有显著性差异,高分组与中分组和低分组之间存在显著性差异,但其频率均在＂使用情况一般＂的范畴内,只有元认知写作策略进入回归方程,对英语成绩有一定的预测作用。因此,高职英语专业学生的英语写作策略亟待提高。 相似文献
15.
University students' beliefs about themselvesas writers and about the experience of learningin writing were investigated as related towriting approaches as measured by the Inventoryof Processes in College Composition (Lavelle 1993). General findings included support forthe deep and surface paradigm as well asvariation in students' conceptions of writing,in their attitudes about themselves as writers,and in their felt need for personal expressionin writing. Implications for instruction andfurther research are included. 相似文献
16.
Teresa Guasch Anna Espasa Montserrat Martinez-Melo 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2019,44(1):111-123
Research on feedback has focused more on generating feedback rather than on how students use it and implement it; that is, what type of cognitive, metacognitive or affective activity students engage in once they have received feedback. In order to visualize feedback use and implementation, a quasi-experimental study was carried out. Students were randomly assigned to four conditions, in respect of the type of feedback (corrective, epistemic-questioning, suggestive and epistemic?+?suggestive). This research provides evidence of how students use and implement feedback in online collaborative writing. Findings show that when students received epistemic?+?suggestive feedback, they engaged in more cognitive and metacognitive activities. With regard to implementation, students who received epistemic?+?suggestive feedback obtained better final marks. This study highlights the importance of metacognitive activities in online learning, as they play a key role in the implementation of feedback. 相似文献
17.
18.
It has been claimed that writing to learn mathematics (WTLM) may benefit students' conceptual understanding as well as their
procedural ability. To investigate this claim, we collected data from students in two sections of an introductory calculus
course. In one of the sections, students used WTLM activities and discussed the activities after completing the writing; in
the other section, students used similar activities that did not involve writing but engaged them in thinking about the mathematical
ideas and in discussing the activities. The errors from the in-class and final exams of both groups of students were categorized
and analyzed for information about the students' conceptual and procedural understanding. We found no significant differences
between the WTLM group and the non-writing group, which suggests that the real benefit from writing activities may not be
in the actual activity of writing, but rather in the fact that such activities require students to struggle to understand
mathematical ideas well enough to communicate their understanding to others.
This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date. 相似文献
19.
High-quality writing instruction is vital to supporting developing writers as they learn to plan, compose, and revise text. It is equally important that such instruction enhances students’ self-efficacy for writing as well as their motivation to write. The main aim of the present study was to investigate the incremental effect of peer-assisted writing in an explicit writing instruction program on Flemish upper-elementary students’ writing performance, self-efficacy for writing, and writing motivation. A randomized control design, using multilevel analyses, was conducted to determine the differential effectiveness of two experimental writing treatments (EI+PA and EI+IND) compared to a business as usual control condition (BAU). Both experimental writing treatments involved explicit instruction in writing, with students in one condition writing with a peer (EI+PA) and students in the other condition writing individually (EI+IND). Participating classes (N = 431 students, N = 20 teachers) were randomly assigned to the three conditions and students were assessed before and after instruction. EI+PA students outperformed both EI+IND and BAU students on the writing measure in the instructed genre but not in the uninstructed genre. Additionally, although EI+PA students were more confident as to their capability (self-efficacy) to generate ideas when compared to their EI+IND counterparts, EI+PA students’ writing motivation, characterized by internal or external motives, was significantly lower than EI+IND students. The findings of the present study corroborate and extend the limited number of prior studies illustrating the surplus value of peer-assisted writing in explicit writing instruction programs. 相似文献