共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 156 毫秒
1.
2.
对于初中生英语口语能力的培养,口语教学中教师的教学理念需要转变,通过多样的教学,调动学生"说"的积极性,在英语口语能力的培养过程中,教师对学生口语的评价应多元化,培养学生良好的口语习惯。 相似文献
3.
彭静 《和田师范专科学校学报》2010,29(5):115-116
口语教学的改革与完善离不开口语测试的改革与完善。随着测试学的发展,＂形成性评价＂越来越被大家熟悉并应用到口语教学过程中,成为＂终结性评价＂的有益补充。本文分析了大学英语口语测试中＂形成性评价＂的效度。＂形成性评价＂更好地反映了学生的口语水平,有助于发现并解决口语教学过程中的问题,从而发挥测试的＂后效＂作用,促进学生的口语学习。 相似文献
4.
王强 《黔南民族师范学院学报》2009,29(5):67-71
通过教学实验考察任务型教学中＂聚焦于形＂对大学生词块习得与英语口语水平的作用。研究方法是通过对比实验班与对照班受试者在英语惯用法等词块习得与口语口语能力方面的测试成绩差异并进行相关性分析。实验结果显示：＂聚焦于形＂在任务型教学中有利于平衡语言形式加工与语义加工,显著促进大学生英语词块习得与口语能力的提高。 相似文献
5.
徐艳秋 《佳木斯教育学院学报》2016,(4):410-411
当前各高校越来越重视英语口语教学,然而由于英语口语教学评价方式比较单一,评价内容较简单,不利于学生口语交际能力的培养提高,而多元评价体系是基于多元智能理论和建构主义的评价体系,本文将在分析英语口语教学及评价体系的现状和存在的问题基础上,从评价主体、评价方式、评价内容和评价标准方面探索英语口语多元评价体系,以全面综合评价学生发展,提升英语口语教学质量。 相似文献
6.
大学生的口语交际水平比较低,短期的口语培训能取得一些成效,但维持时间不久。为此,作者以形成性评价的方式对一批全封闭口语培训及在学院接受三个月常规口语教学的学生进行为期一个学期的实验研究,实验表明形成性评价的评估体系是对大学英语口语教学的一种支持．提供了一个较为可行的评价工具,有利于培养学生参与合作、自我评估的能力。 相似文献
7.
五年制高职生口语训练的教学评价要针对高职生这一特定群体的特点,制订明确的口语训练目标,综合运用多种有效的评价方法,要面向全体学生,注重因材施教,提倡主体多元化、发展性动态评价,立足三维目标,构建和谐的评价体系。 相似文献
8.
英语口语评价综合化的设计 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
罗静 《十堰职业技术学院学报》2008,21(6):113-115
探讨了英语口语评价的必要性及其现状,提出了形成性评价与终结性评价相结合的口语综合评价体系,该评价体系对英语口语教学有着积极的反拨作用。 相似文献
9.
郭靓 《中国科教创新导刊》2008,(10):109-109
英语口语表达能力的重要性日益凸现出来,学生越来越希望能够摆脱＂哑吧英语＂的困境,提高他们的英语口语水平。因此如何提高大学生的英语口语交流水平,如何建立科学、有效的大学英语口语教学,成为我们探讨和研究的重要课题。本文拟从分析口语教学的主要问题出发,探索如何利用口语教学模式的新思路促进学生学习英语口语的积极性,从而有效地提高大学英语口语的教学水平。 相似文献
10.
程颖 《重庆广播电视大学学报》2011,23(1):14-17
PRETCO口语考试要求学生综合运用所学的语言知识,在短时间内把想要说的内容表达出来,并且做到语言精炼准确,内容丰富。PRETCO口语考试有助于提高学生学习的自主性,但在某种程度上具有＂应试教育＂倾向,让部分学生产生英语学习的焦虑感。要提高PRETCO口语考试的正面反拨效应,必须明确高职高专英语口语教学的目标,改革高职高专英语口语教学模式,更新高职高专英语口语教材,促进多媒体教育技术在高职高专英语口语教学中的运用。 相似文献
11.
同伴互评作为一种形成性评价策略,已经成为现阶段网络学习评价领域研究的热点。本研究将同伴互评策略应用于高校混合式教学之中,设计同伴互评学习活动。研究整体采用行动研究法设计、修改同伴互评活动,并分析学习者对活动的改进意见。研究一方面分析互评活动对在线学习效果的影响以及活动对于两类学习风格学习者影响的差异;另一方面深入分析学习者对于活动的态度及改进意见。主要研究结论认为：（1）研究设计的同伴互评活动能够促进学习者深入理解学习内容,并提升最终成果的质量。（2）相对综合型学习风格的学习者而言,同伴互评更加有助于提升序列型学习者对知识运用的水平。最后,研究总结了同伴互评活动设计的改进方案及后续设计要点。 相似文献
12.
Daniel Reinholz 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2016,41(2):301-315
This paper advances a model describing how peer assessment supports self-assessment. Although prior research demonstrates that peer assessment promotes self-assessment, the connection between these two activities is underspecified. This model, the assessment cycle, draws from theories of self-assessment to elaborate how learning takes place through peer assessment. The model is applied to three activity structures described in the literature to analyse their potential to support learning by promoting self-assessment. Broadly speaking, the model can be used to understand learning that takes place in a variety of peer assessment activities: marking/grading, analysis, feedback, conferencing and revision. This approach contrasts most studies on peer assessment, which have focused on calibration of instructor and peer grades, rather than learning opportunities. 相似文献
13.
14.
15.
Raoul Mulder Chi Baik Ryan Naylor Jon Pearce 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2014,39(6):657-677
Involving students in peer review has many pedagogical benefits, but few studies have explicitly investigated relationships between the content of peer reviews, student perceptions and assessment outcomes. We conducted a case study of peer review within a third-year undergraduate subject at a research-intensive Australian university, in which we examined: (1) students’ perceptions of the peer review process before and after peer review, (2) content of the peer reviews and what kinds of feedback were adopted and (3) the effect of participation in peer review on performance (grades) in the assessment task. Students overwhelmingly perceived peer review to be beneficial, and the opportunity to participate in peer review resulted in a significant improvement in the quality of work submitted for assessment. Students who benefited most from peer review were those of below-median performance, and the magnitude of benefit was related to the degree to which students engaged with the peer review process. Our study confirms that participation in peer review can lead to important improvements in performance and learning outcomes. 相似文献
16.
This study examines the impact of an assessment training module on student assessment skills and task performance in a technology-facilitated peer assessment. Seventy-eight undergraduate students participated in the study. The participants completed an assessment training exercise, prior to engaging in peer-assessment activities. During the training, students reviewed learning concepts, discussed marking criteria, graded example projects and compared their evaluations with the instructor’s evaluation. Data were collected in the form of initial and final versions of students’ projects, students’ scoring of example projects before and after the assessment training, and written feedback that students provided on peer projects. Results of data analysis indicate that the assessment training led to a significant decrease in the discrepancy between student ratings and instructor rating of example projects. In addition, the degree of student vs. instructor discrepancy was highly predictive of the quality of feedback that students provided to their peers and the effectiveness of revisions that they made to their own projects upon receiving peer feedback. Smaller discrepancies in ratings were associated with provision of higher quality peer feedback during peer assessment, as well as better revision of initial projects after peer assessment. 相似文献
17.
刘莉 《临沂师范学院学报》2014,(2):133-136
同伴评估是现代教育理论指导下评估体系的重要环节,也是大学英语口语评估的重要手段。为提高大学英语口语教学质量,在大学英语口语教学中实践同伴评估。通过调查问卷和访谈,本次调查发现同伴评估在增强学生学习英语的自信心与兴趣,培养学生应用学习策略的意识和能力,增强学生的自主学习能力等方面都起到了积极的作用,但也有少部分学生对同伴评估不适应。本研究提供的启示是:优化同伴评估过程,在动态评估过程中增加生生互动和师生活动。 相似文献
18.
AbstractPeer assessment has proven to have positive learning outcomes. Importantly, peer assessment is a social process and some claim that the use of anonymity might have advantages. However, the findings have not always been in the same direction. Our aims were: (a) to review the effects of using anonymity in peer assessment on performance, peer feedback content, peer grading accuracy, social effects and students’ perspective on peer assessment; and (b) to investigate the effects of four moderating variables (educational level, peer grading, assessment aids, direction of anonymity) in relation to anonymity. A literature search was conducted including five different terms related to peer assessment (e.g., peer feedback) and anonymity. Fourteen studies that used a control group or a within group design were found. The narrative review revealed that anonymous peer assessment seems to provide advantages for students’ perceptions about the learning value of peer assessment, delivering more critical peer feedback, increased self-perceived social effects, a slight tendency for more performance, especially in higher education and with less peer assessment aids. Some conclusions are that: (a) when implementing anonymity in peer assessment the instructional context and goals need to be considered, (b) existent empirical research is still limited, and (c) future research should employ stronger and more complex research designs. 相似文献
19.
Markus Mostert 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2013,38(6):674-686
In the context of widening participation, large classes and increased diversity, assessment of student learning is becoming increasingly problematic in that providing formative feedback aimed at developing student writing proves to be particularly laborious. Although the potential value of peer assessment has been well documented in the literature, the associated administrative burden, also in relation to managing anonymity and intellectual ownership, makes this option less attractive, particularly in large classes. A potential solution involves the use of information and communication technologies to automate the logistics associated with peer assessment in a time-efficient way. However, uptake of such systems in the higher education community is limited, and research in this area is only beginning. This case study reports on the use of the Moodle Workshop module for formative peer assessment of students’ individual work in a first-year introductory macro-economics class of over 800 students. Data were collected through an end-of-course evaluation survey of students. The study found that using the feature-rich Workshop module not only addressed many of the practical challenges associated with paper-based peer assessments, but also provided a range of additional options for enhancing validity and reliability of peer assessments that would not be possible with paper-based systems. 相似文献
20.
Huahui Zhao 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2018,43(7):1133-1145
Despite the increasing volume of research in peer assessment for writing, few studies have been conducted to explore teachers’ perceptions of its appropriateness for writing instruction. It is essential to understand teachers’ perceptions of peer assessment as teachers play an important role in whether and how peer assessment is implemented in their instruction. The current study investigated tertiary English writing tutors’ perceptions of the appropriateness of peer assessment for English as a Foreign Language writing in China, where peer assessment has been increasingly discussed and researched but only occasionally used in teaching. The current study scrutinised the reasons behind its limited use via in-depth exploratory interviews with 25 writing tutors with different teaching backgrounds. The interview data showed tutors’ limited knowledge of peer assessment and unanimous hesitation in using it. The former was explained by insufficient instruction and training in peer assessment. The latter relates to the incompatibility of peer assessment with the examinations-oriented education system, learners’ low English language proficiency and learning motivation, and the conflict of peer assessment with the entrenched teacher-driven learning culture. Suggestions are made about training and engaging teachers to effectively use peer assessment in instruction. 相似文献