共查询到19条相似文献，搜索用时 203 毫秒
1.
美国高等教育质量保证体系的特点及其对具有中国特色质量保证体系建设的启示 总被引：7，自引：0，他引：7
从质量保证活动、质量认证机构、认证认可机构三个方面入手,对美国高等教育质量保证体系作了尽可能全面和系统的介绍;对该体系中高等教育机构、质量认证机构、认证认可机构之间的关系进行了分析;总结了该体系的若干特点及其对具有中国特色质量保证体系建设的几点启示。 相似文献
2.
3.
许培源 《山西财经大学学报(高等教育版)》2008,11(2):15-20
跨国高等教育质量认证问题牵涉到各国的文化与传统,因而,迄今为止还没有出现一个国际间认可且具有约束力的认证机制。基于不同文化、传统的各国高等教育质量认证机制的巨大差异成为跨国高等教育发展不可愈越的障碍。在克服这一障碍的过程中,形成了跨国高等教育质量认证的四种模式,即基于国家质量认证系统、基于双边或多边认证、基于后认证和基于国际质量认证的认证模式。纵观四种模式,每一种模式都有其特殊的问题,基于双边或多边认证的模式发展最为迅速．而国际性的质量认证模式还不可能成为主流。 相似文献
4.
ISO认证：高等教育质量管理的新思路 总被引：29，自引：0，他引：29
ISO9000系列标准是一套被国际上各认证审机构唯一认可的质量保证体系。开展教育质量ISO认证，有利于学校和教育工作树立质量意识、责任意识和竞争意识，维护消费的合法权益，推动高等教育质量管理与国际接轨。 相似文献
5.
王昕红 《河南师范大学学报(教育科学版)》2009,(2):45-46
在美国高等教育质量保证领域,“认可”是一个引人瞩目的活动领域。作为采用一套特定标准,对认证者的质量和效力进行评审的过程,它与保证和改善高等教育认证质量息息相关,从而对高等教育产生重大影响。 相似文献
6.
美国高等教育质量保障体系历史悠久．具有较为成熟的理论研究和丰富的实践经验。认证制度是美国高等教育质量保障机制的重要组成部分,也是世界上发展得比较完善的一种高等教育评估制度。美国教育家伯顿·克拉克在《高等教育百科全书》中指出：“认证是指高等教育中,通过检查或评估,或二者兼而有之,使院校或者院校中的专业得到认可。标明达到了可接受的最低标准的质量控制和质量保证的过程。” 相似文献
7.
美国高等教育认证理事会:认可目标、标准和程序 总被引：3，自引：1，他引：3
质量认证是美国高等教育质量保证的重要途径之一.美国质量认证由民间机构完成.各认证机构自成体系,认证的传统、目标、标准和程序各不相同.因此,如何协调各认证机构的质量认证,确保各认证机构质量就变得十分重要.本文试图通过对美国成立不久的全美高等教育质量认证理事会的介绍,以说明该机构在质量认证机构的沟通和协调上所起的重要作用,并在此基础上归纳出美国高等教育质量认证机构资格认可的三个特点. 相似文献
8.
高等教育认证国际化的新视野 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
从学术规范、专业整合、质量保证、制度创新等方面论证了高等教育认证国际化的意义，阐述了在上述领域进行国际认证的内容、必要性及措施。并用比较的方法对国际认证和国内评估体系进行了对比，在此基础上阐述了构建国际认证体系的构想。 相似文献
9.
博洛尼亚进程从学位学历认证、质量保证体系等方面力图促进欧洲高等教育一体化和高等教育质量的提高。在改变欧洲高等教育的同时,博洛尼亚进程也对世界许多国家高等教育的发展以及国际高等教育服务贸易市场产生了深远影响。 相似文献
10.
高等教育质量保证小议 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
就当前高等教育质量保证中出现的种种现象提出议论和观点,并引用外国的和中国香港地区的相关信息作为借鉴。论点包括:质量保证以内部为主;外部质量保证以合格评估为宜;外部质量保证运作以独立为本;质量标准以学习产出为重;被评学校以学位层次区分;政府应以认可、引领和服务为己任;质量管理以质量文化为魂;质量保证以国际经验为鉴等等。 相似文献
11.
Quality assurance at a distance: international accreditation in Taiwan higher education 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
In response to the global competitiveness in higher education, the government, in recent years, has encouraged Taiwan colleges
and universities to seek international accreditation, which raises several questions, such as jurisdiction over national accreditation,
a single set of standards for local and global quality assurance, demand for the mutual recognition of review outcomes, etc.
With the looming pressures for change that international accreditation will likely pose on a Taiwan national framework of
quality assurance, multiple impacts on institutions and national accrediting agencies in Taiwan are now beginning to be increasingly
felt. Hence, this paper examines current academic international accreditation programs and institutions, recognizes Taiwan’s
accrediting organizations, and analyzes the challenges that institutions and national accrediting agencies are facing. 相似文献
12.
姚荣 《河北师范大学学报(教育科学版)》2021,23(2)
高等教育质量保障的法律规制是大学法研究的前沿议题,以德国与美国为代表的两大法律体系,分别被纳入公法规制与普通法规制的范畴。在德国,高等教育认证行为属于行政行为,高校与认证代理机构之间的纠纷属于公法争议。申诉、行政诉讼与宪法诉愿等公法救济机制,构成德国高等学校与认证代理机构之间纠纷的解决渠道。如何避免认证对学术自由构成侵害,已成为德国公法学界与实务界关注的核心议题。受联邦宪法法院大学课程认证裁定的影响,德国高等教育认证体系正在进行深刻变革与调整。在美国,高等教育认证机构具有非营利性组织的法律地位,须履行诚实信用以及基本的正当程序等普通法的一般义务。高等教育认证机构对“认证联邦化”的抵制以及高等教育机构对认证决定的抱怨或不满,构成美国高等教育质量保障纠纷的焦点议题。穷尽内部救济与“司法终局性”原则,被视为美国高等教育质量保障纠纷的解决机制。德美两国在高等教育质量保障法律纠纷的解决中形成的经验和教训,对我国明确高等教育质量保障机构的法律地位、强化高等教育质量保障的程序正义、建全高等教育质量的多元纠纷解决机制具有重要启示。 相似文献
13.
Halit Hami Öz 《Higher Education in Europe》2005,30(3-4):335-344
There has been considerable interest in national quality assurance process in Turkey following the pilot accreditation project of the Engineering College of the Middle East Technical University (METU) by the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET), in 2000. ABET accreditation of the Engineering Colleges of Bosphorus and Bilkent Universities followed that of METU. These universities use their accreditation by ABET to attract the best students in the country. Newly founded private universities, in particular, are trying to use the accreditation of their programmes by international accreditation agencies for marketing purposes. The Higher Educational Council [Yuksek Ögretim Kurumu (YÖK)], which governs all the universities in Turkey, is currently promoting accreditation studies to improve the quality of higher education in the universities. This is a report on accreditation processes in higher education in Turkey. 相似文献
14.
In 2012, Taiwan implemented a dual-track quality assurance system comprising accreditation and self-accreditation in higher education institutions. Self-accrediting institutions can accredit their programs without requiring approval from external quality assurance agencies. In contrast to other countries, the Ministry of Education of Taiwan authorized self-accrediting institutions to develop their own evaluation standards. This study investigated the institution-based accreditation standards and their implications on institutional internal quality assurance. Content analysis revealed that 37 % of the indicators of self-accreditation were new and not used as review indicators in the original accreditation track. Two frequently added indicators were featured indicators and levels of internationalization. The results also indicated that institutions tend to structure their internal quality assurance systems uniquely. Three types of approaches for developing institution-based standards were identified: bottom-up, hybrid, and innovative approaches. Self-accreditation has benefited institutions committed to educational quality and pursuing excellence by enabling them to employ a fitness-for-purpose approach. The diversity of higher education and educational policy changes constitute new challenges to higher education. Balancing between accountability and autonomy is critical for all stakeholders of higher education. 相似文献
15.
Cross-border higher education (CBHE) has taken centre stage in the Southern Africa Development Community (SADC). There has been increased trade in higher education services among member states of the SADC. This has necessitated regional regulatory cooperation in quality assurance and accreditation. SADC has established the Southern African Quality Assurance Network as a regional network of external quality assurance agencies. This paper presents a framework that can be used to enhance regulatory cooperation within the Network on quality assurance in higher education with special focus on CBHE. The paper identifies the main areas of focus as people mobility, institutional and programme mobility, accreditation and registration and recognition of academic credentials. Proposed mechanisms for regulatory cooperation include regional credit accumulation and transfer system, regional qualifications framework, framework for accreditation and registration of foreign providers and framework for recognition of academic credentials. 相似文献
16.
Yung-Chi Hou Martin Ince Sandy Tsai Wayne Wang Vicky Hung Chung Lin Jiang 《高等教育研究与发展》2016,35(3):473-487
Joint degree programs have gained popularity in East Asia, due to the growth of transnational higher education in the region since 2000. However, the external quality assurance (QA) and accreditation of joint degree programs is a challenge for QA agencies, as it normally involves the engagement of several institutions and multiple national accreditation procedures. The purpose of this study is to explore current QA approaches to joint degree programs in Europe and East Asia from the perspectives of QA agencies. There are four major findings from the study. First, East Asian countries tend to stipulate national regulations for a joint degree program. Second, an external QA mechanism for joint degree programs has not yet been developed in East Asian nations. Third, the adoption of international accreditation as the popular approach for joint degree programs in business fields in Asia raises the serious issue of national jurisdiction over higher education. Fourth, the European Consortium for Education's (ECA) single accreditation mode is highly recommended by QA agencies. 相似文献
17.
Gerardo Blanco Ramírez 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2015,40(7):943-957
This article reports on findings from a sociolinguistic qualitative study exploring inter-discursive relations manifested in the approaches and strategies that regional accrediting agencies in the United States utilise when recognising foreign universities. Even as most countries have developed national quality assurance systems and whilst international rankings comparing institutions globally are available, a growing number of universities around the world seek recognition from American regional agencies. By comparing policy statements, manuals, guidelines and other documents, and after interviewing top-level officers at US accrediting agencies, this study makes explicit the assumptions and central discourses associated with US accreditation of non-US institutions of higher education, from the accreditors’ perspective. Following constant comparison and cultural critical discourse analysis, the study reveals concerns about the equivalency of quality, emphasis on capacity building and reluctance toward adapting US standards. An interest in building international partnerships, in order to respond to globalisation, is also identified. 相似文献
18.
参与商学院国际认证已成为国内商科教育追求卓越、增强国际竞争力的一种重要战略手段。本研究从认证程序、认证范围、认证标准等方面简要介绍了AACSB 国际认证的基本框架,着重从关注组织使命的陈述、影响与创新,重视利益相关者对认证过程的全员参与,关注学生学习保障机制的构建等方面剖析了卓越商科教育质量认证的主要特点,并从推动本科层次“ 中国式”商学院认证体系建立、促进商学院内部质量文化共识形成、推进学习结果评价为抓手的长效质量保障机制构建等方面,为国内不同层次的商科教育尤其中外合作办学商科教育走向卓越提供参考价值。 相似文献
19.
Higher Education - Accreditation in higher education has become omnipresent and, on many occasions, has been used as a synonym for quality assurance. The establishment of accreditation agencies as... 相似文献