共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 109 毫秒
1.
现代信息技术在英语教学领域中得到了广泛的应用。尝试将现代信息技术引入英语写作教学,利用网络资源和网页的交互特点,建立一种有效的英语写作教学模式,充分发挥学生主体性和能动性,实现信息的更好反馈,从而调动学生的英语写作兴趣,使学生的英语书面写作能力得到提高。 相似文献
2.
现代信息技术在英语教学领域中得到了广泛的应用。尝试将现代信息技术引入英语写作教学，利用网络资源和网页的交互特点，建立一种有效的英语写作教学模式，充分发挥学生主体性和能动性，实现信息的更好反馈，从而调动学生的英语写作兴趣，使学生的英语书面写作能力得到提高。 相似文献
3.
反馈是大学英语写作教学的重要组成部分,客观即时的反馈有助于提高学生的写作水平。但是,我国大学英语写作教学反馈的现状却不容乐观。文章简要分析了当前大学英语写作反馈存在的诸多问题,提出并探讨了如何使用在线英语写作及自动评分反馈系统为师生提供综合性即时反馈,并进一步阐述了该系统的优点和不足,为我国英语写作教学与改革、英语写作行为的研究提供了一个新的研究视角。 相似文献
4.
随着过程法将“反馈”引入写作教学，反馈在二影外语写作中的作用越来越受重视。从我国EFL的写作教学环境出发，在分析不同反馈形式的特点的基础上，结合写作过程的不同阶段和各个阶段师生／同学交互特点，讨论了不同反馈形式在写作过程中不同阶段的运用及其作用。 相似文献
5.
网络平台作为英语写作教学的辅助手段不等于教学材料的数字化,而是通过师生之间﹑生生之间的充分互动与交流,将基于网络平台的课堂建设成充满交互真实语境的学习环境,促进学生写作能力的提高。基于网络平台的英语写作同伴反馈教学借助现代教育信息技术,使学生以＂作者＂和＂读者＂的双重角色参与到学习中来,学生不再仅仅依赖教师反馈来评价自己的文章,而教师在其中扮演的引导者、监督指导者和总结者的角色,能够及时发现学生反馈中的不足,进一步促进学生的思考和理解。网络平台作为一种技术手段被整合到教学中来,为学生提供了丰富的教学资源,同时也记录了学生的学习过程。在两轮行动研究的教学实践中,通过计划、行动、观察和反思,探讨如何促进网络平台、学生、教师三要素之间充分而有效的信息交互,从而保证教学取得成功,促进学生英语写作水平的提高。 相似文献
6.
《中国教育信息化》2014,(24)
网络平台作为英语写作教学的辅助手段不等于教学材料的数字化,而是通过师生之间﹑生生之间的充分互动与交流,将基于网络平台的课堂建设成充满交互真实语境的学习环境,促进学生写作能力的提高。基于网络平台的英语写作同伴反馈教学借助现代教育信息技术,使学生以"作者"和"读者"的双重角色参与到学习中来,学生不再仅仅依赖教师反馈来评价自己的文章,而教师在其中扮演的引导者、监督指导者和总结者的角色,能够及时发现学生反馈中的不足,进一步促进学生的思考和理解。网络平台作为一种技术手段被整合到教学中来,为学生提供了丰富的教学资源,同时也记录了学生的学习过程。在两轮行动研究的教学实践中,通过计划、行动、观察和反思,探讨如何促进网络平台、学生、教师三要素之间充分而有效的信息交互,从而保证教学取得成功,促进学生英语写作水平的提高。 相似文献
7.
《佳木斯教育学院学报》2018,(3)
当代英语教师一直把听、说、读、写看作是教学过程中的重难点,英语写作的教学改革也在不断地进行,近几年同伴反馈这一话题逐渐吸引了学者们的目光。本文把同伴反馈和高中阶段英语教学过程结合起来,依次叙述了将同伴反馈应用在高中阶段的英语教课中的意义和同伴反馈的应用策略等不同的角度,目的是将在英语写作方面的一些教学和学习经验传递给我国的英语传授者和习得者。 相似文献
8.
随着写作研究的进一步深入,同伴反馈越来越受到国内外专家和学者的关注。本文从教师反馈和同伴发馈的对比研究和对同伴反馈有效性的研究两方面论述了对同伴反馈的研究现状,并对同伴反馈在英语写作教学中的作用和弊端作了简要阐述,为英语写作教学提供一些启示。 相似文献
9.
本文以肇庆学院部分班级作为研究对象,对英语写作评改反馈策略进行探索。实践中将同伴反馈与教师反馈同时引入写作评改环节,强调师生、生生之间的系列交互与协商,为写作教学改革提供一种思路,有助于学生突破写作瓶颈。 相似文献
10.
本文探索了书面纠错反馈对英语写作语法准确度影响的总体效应和调节效应,研究结果表明书面纠错反馈对英语写作语法准确度有显著中等程度的正向影响。同时,书面纠错反馈对英语写作语法准确度的促进作用受到学习者的教育层次、反馈类型、反馈范围、反馈时机以及反馈来源等调节变量的影响。基于研究结果,就书面纠错反馈对英语写作语法准确度的影响及其发生作用机理进行了思考,为英语写作教学的有效设计与实施提供借鉴和参考。 相似文献
11.
李海英 《北京教育学院学报》2015,(6):78-83
做好写作反馈是提高高中生英语写作能力的一个重要途径。根据文献中有关写作教学和写作反馈的内容,从师生两方面进行了问卷调查和访谈,旨在探讨英语书面表达教学中教师和学生对写作反馈的态度和倾向;提出写作反馈需形式多样,反馈评价重点要明确、具体,引导到位。 相似文献
12.
Bart Huisman Nadira Saab Jan van Driel Paul van den Broek 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2018,43(6):955-968
Within the higher education context, peer feedback is frequently applied as an instructional method. Research on the learning mechanisms involved in the peer feedback process has covered aspects of both providing and receiving feedback. However, a direct comparison of the impact that providing and receiving peer feedback has on students’ writing performance is still lacking. The current study compared the writing performance of undergraduate students (N = 83) who either provided or received anonymous written peer feedback in the context of an authentic academic writing task. In addition, we investigated whether students’ peer feedback perceptions were related to the nature of the peer feedback they received and to writing performance. Results showed that both providing and receiving feedback led to similar improvements of writing performance. The presence of explanatory comments positively related both to how adequate students perceived the peer feedback to be, as well as to students’ willingness to improve based upon it. However, no direct relation was found between these peer feedback perceptions and students’ writing performance increase. 相似文献
13.
李晓燕 《南昌教育学院学报》2011,26(3):165-166
教师反馈是英语写作教学过程中的重要一环,深刻影响着学生的认知发展。本文通过实证研究得出,教师反馈对学生大学英语写作水平的提高起着促进和激励作用。基于实证研究,笔者进一步分析教师反馈对提高学生大学英语写作能力的作用,并探讨如何充分发挥教师反馈的作用,努力提高学生的大学英语写作能力。 相似文献
14.
自我监控技巧能使学生控制所得到的教师反馈,并且能促使教师形成有效的反馈。教师根据学生提问的要点形成直接且合适的反馈。本文采用了实证研究的方法探讨自我监控技巧在大学英语过程写作中的应用及其对写作的影响。结果表明,学生能够通过训练掌握该技巧;在写作中使用该技巧有助于教师了解学生存在的问题和想法,使学生更可能地控制所得到的教师反馈;自我监控技巧尤其对提高学生的写作组织能力有益。 相似文献
15.
Sin Wang Chong 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2019,44(7):1090-1105
The increasing prominence of technology has given rise to new ways for writing teachers to give feedback electronically. Specifically, this article focuses on electronic written feedback (e-feedback) given to a group of English-as-a-Second-Language (ESL) community college students. Although previous studies have investigated the effectiveness of different computer-mediated feedback practices (e.g. video feedback, audio feedback, multimodal feedback), there is a dearth of research which examines the effectiveness of e-feedback and lower-ability students’ perception of e-feedback in ESL post-compulsory writing classrooms which adopt a process writing approach. The present study, which aims to shed light on this research gap and inform ESL writing teachers’ feedback practices, investigates how feedback is given and attended to online by 93 students of an international community college in Hong Kong. Adopting grounded theory as the methodology and a tripartite definition of written feedback as the conceptual framework, the present study reports students’ perception of e-feedback on Google Docs from two sources: students’ written reflections and semi-structured, focus group interviews. Implications related to e-feedback practices are discussed. 相似文献
16.
This study reports on the role of students’ reflections in their teacher written feedback. Informed by a qualitative case study approach, this study collected data from 18 students across a semester of an English-as-a-foreign language writing course at a university in China. In the course, teacher written feedback and students’ reflections were both informed by writing as a meaning-making process. The data sources included 72 pieces of student essays, 144 pieces of reflection written by the students, and post-semester interviews with the students. The study showed that engaging students in writing reflections was helpful for developing their knowledge of writing, although the process somewhat followed a zigzag trajectory. The exercise helped them transcend their previous knowledge repertoires, thereby assisting them in critically understanding their revision process and refining their knowledge of writing in response to the teacher’s written feedback. In particular, the students felt that the meaning-making-based reflections provided clear and accessible layers for them to understand the close relationship between language and content. As such, the students felt that they were able to harness their reflections as a written venue through which they could critically digest the teacher’s written feedback and develop their knowledge of writing as a meaning-making process while dialoguing with their instructor. 相似文献
17.
Bart Huisman Nadira Saab Paul van den Broek Jan van Driel 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2019,44(6):863-880
Peer feedback is frequently implemented with academic writing tasks in higher education. However, a quantitative synthesis is still lacking for the impact that peer feedback has on students’ writing performance. The current study conveyed two types of observations. First, regarding the impact of peer feedback on writing performance, this study synthesized the results of 24 quantitative studies reporting on higher education students’ academic writing performance after peer feedback. Engagement in peer feedback resulted in larger writing improvements compared to (no-feedback) controls (g?=?0.91 [0.41, 1.42]) and compared to self-assessment (g?=?0.33 [0.01, 0.64]). Peer feedback and teacher feedback resulted in similar writing improvements (g?=?0.46 [-0.44, 1.36]). The nature of the peer feedback significantly moderated the impact that peer feedback had on students’ writing improvement, whereas only a theoretically plausible, though non-significant moderating pattern was found for the number of peers that students engaged with. Second, this study shows that the number of well-controlled studies into the effects of peer feedback on writing is still low, indicating the need for more quantitative, methodologically sound research in this field. Findings and implications are discussed both for higher education teaching practice and future research approaches and directions. 相似文献
18.
There does not appear to be consensus on how to optimally match students during the peer feedback process: with same-ability peers (homogeneously) or different-ability peers (heterogeneously). In fact, there appears to be no empirical evidence that either homogeneous or heterogeneous student matching has any direct effect on writing performance. The current study addressed this issue in the context of an academic writing task. Adopting a quasi-experimental design, 94 undergraduate students were matched in 47 homogeneous or heterogeneous reciprocal dyads, and provided anonymous, formative peer feedback on each other’s draft essays. The relations between students’ individual ability or dyad composition, feedback quality and writing performance were investigated. Neither individual ability nor dyad composition directly related to writing performance. Also, feedback quality did not depend on students’ individual ability or dyad composition, although trends in the data suggest that high-ability reviewers provided more content-related feedback. Finally, peer feedback quality was not related to writing performance, and authors of varying ability levels benefited to a similar extent from peer feedback on different aspects of the text. The results are discussed in relation to their implications for the instructional design of academic writing assignments that incorporate peer feedback. 相似文献
19.
我国二语写作教学中"教师一次性评定"的传统评改模式制约着学生二语写作能力的发展。同伴互助交流并共同探讨写作任务,是将输出假设理论应用于二语写作的积极尝试。在二语写作过程中,通过学习者的互助互评,并反思同伴的意见反馈,对中国学生二语写作能力的构建和发展有积极的意义。 相似文献
20.
Alberth 《Technology, Pedagogy and Education》2019,28(1):21-36
The study aimed to scrutinise how incorporating Facebook into a conventional writing class might impact on students’ intrinsic motivation, self-efficacy and writing performance, and to uncover how best to provide corrective feedback on students’ writing posted on Facebook. Sixty-four subjects from an intact group were recruited by means of purposive sampling. All participants sat the pre-test measuring intrinsic motivation to study writing, writing self-efficacy and writing performance. Following the pre-test, participants attended a regular conventional writing class incorporating Facebook for four months. At the conclusion of the study, participants sat the post-test and were interviewed regarding their learning experience. Participants were also requested to indicate which type of feedback provided on FB is preferred and to justify their responses. It was found that students’ intrinsic motivation and self-efficacy, as well as writing performance, improved markedly in the post-test and that direct corrective feedback is more favoured by students. Overall, the study suggests that not only does incorporating Facebook into a conventional writing class benefit students academically, but it also helps boost their intrinsic motivation to study writing and writing self-efficacy – two critical variables that dictate success in foreign language learning. 相似文献