共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 176 毫秒
1.
教师如何结合科研课题提高大学生毕业论文质量 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
大学生毕业论文选题结合教师的科研课题．充分调动了指导老师的积极性,毕业论文可最终转化为指导教师科研课题的科研成果。这种模式有利于培养学生的实践创新能力,提高教师的科研能力和教学水平。 相似文献
2.
3.
杜燕军 《安阳师范学院学报》2012,(2):119-121
针对实验教学和毕业论文的特点,构建一套集开放式实验、科研训练、毕业论文于一体的实践教学体系,有利于提高学生的实验动手能力,促进学生对专业理论知识的学习和理解,培养了学生的创新能力,最终达到提高教学质量之目的。 相似文献
4.
新增本科院校毕业论文(设计)工作中的问题及应对措施 总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4
毕业论文(设计)是大学本科教育人才培养计划中非常重要的实践教学环节,是检验学生综合运用专业知识解决实际问题的重要手段,对培养学生实践能力、创新能力、科研能力具有不可替代的作用,同时又是学生毕业和学位资格认定的必备条件。毕业论文的质量,直接影响到人才培养的质量,也 相似文献
5.
发酵工程专业毕业论文指导的研究与实践 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
毕业论文是教学中必不可少的实践性环节。本文通过对发酵工程专业毕业论文教学指导的研究与实践，从科学选题、实验指导、实验总结等方面对培养学生的创新能力、科研能力及书面和口头表达能力的经验做了总结和交流。 相似文献
6.
将科研融入实践教学是大学生创新能力培养的重要一环。通过在本科毕业论文环节引入科研项目“中国东北地区地壳与上地幔体波速度、P波各向异性结构研究”,引导学生参与东北地区地壳结构特征野外数据采集与处理、实验结果分析与讨论等项目实施过程关键环节，让学生独立完成相应的科研实践任务，并在此基础上完成毕业论文。该教学方法能够有效提升学生的实践动手能力，培养学生科研兴趣与素养，进而提高学生的科研创新能力。 相似文献
7.
毕业论文是本科教学过程中一个非常重要的教学环节,是对学生所学基础理论、专业知识和实践技能的全面检验,也是培养学生实践能力、科研能力和创新能力的重要手段。由于管理环节、学生自身、指导教师等方面的因素,使目前很多本科生的毕业论文普遍存在质量不高现象。本文采用调查问卷方法,对国内某知名高校N校大气科学专业的本科毕业论文质量问题进行了分析,指出问题,并给出了提高大气科学专业本科生毕业论文质量的一些建议。 相似文献
8.
培养大学生科学素质和开拓创新能力已成为现代高等教育的重要内容。生物科学专业的人才培养模式应更加注重于培养学生的通用能力,塑造科研与创新意识,使学生具备较好的科研素质和创新能力。我们经过多年实践,探索出一条较为科学的提高生物科学专业大学生科研素质的培养模式,主要包括：在课程教学中渗透对大学生科研素质的培养;重视实践教学;鼓励学生参与教师科研项目,设立大学生科研创新活动基金;通过举办学术讲座,创造良好学术氛围;强化毕业论文环节,提高学生综合科研素质。 相似文献
9.
10.
本科毕业论文是本科教育重要的综合性实践教学环节。与实践密切相关的生物科学专业,尤其需要在这一教学环节重视对学生综合能力的训练。从生物科学专业本科毕业论文的教学特点出发,结合实践教学经验,探讨了在这一环节中加强对学生的研究能力、实践能力和创新能力培养的方法。并根据生物科学专业毕业论文中存在的问题,提出进一步提高本科毕业论文质量的措施。 相似文献
11.
博士生延期毕业现象受到高校和政府的重点关注，但相关研究付之阙如。为探寻博士生延期毕业原因及矛盾根源，研究访谈了32位博士生及15位导师。围绕高深知识的生产、学习与传授，得出延期矛盾的根源如下：延期博士生学术基础与高深知识高深性、深奥性的失配，延期博士生学术动力与高深知识开放性、探索性的失配，延期博士生自学能力与高深知识个人性、缄默性的失配，院系培育服务与高深知识学习、传授方式的失配。为改善延期现状，研究建议：应严格把控博士招生环节，多途径提高学生科研素养；正视导学冲突的负面效应，弥合师生沟通的现实张力；加强过程监管及考核力度，回归科研评价的学术本位。 相似文献
12.
教师要通过自己好的教学过程引起和培养学生的学习兴趣,而不是挫伤它。教师不仅是给学生传授知识,教师整个工作的目的是培养各方面都健全发展的人才。学生犯了错误要抱着宽容、理解的态度,要给以改正的机会,最好是引导其自觉改正。作为一名教师,应该专心敬业,老师的行为一定程度上会影响到学生将来的工作态度。而作为高校教师,要搞好教学必须身体力行,在科研上不断前进。这对学生也是一种示范,一种无言的教育。 相似文献
13.
Sae Yeol Yoon Jee Kyung Suh Soonhye Park 《International Journal of Science Education》2013,35(16):2666-2693
Korean students have shown relatively little interest and confidence in learning science, despite being ranked in the top percentile in international evaluations of academic achievement in science such as the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study. Although research indicates a positive relationship between student perceptions of science and their science learning, this area has not been sufficiently explored in Korea. Particularly, even though both students' perceptions of scientific practice and their understanding of the nature of science (NOS) are influenced by their science learning experiences at schools, little research examines how this perception, understanding, and experience are related to one another. This study aimed to uncover Korean students' perceptions of school scientific practice through exploring their drawings, writings, and responses to questionnaires. Participants were 500 Korean students in 3rd, 7th, and 10th grades who were asked to complete an open-ended questionnaire. The results indicated that Korean students typically viewed school scientific practices as experimental activities or listening to lecture; and that most participants held an insufficient understanding of the NOS. Overall, no significant relationship emerged between students' perceptions of school scientific practice and their understanding of the NOS. Our findings highlight the need to help both teachers and students understand the potential breadth of school scientific practices, beyond simple ‘activity mania.’ This study also suggests that teachers must balance implicit and explicit instructional approaches to teaching about the NOS through scientific practices in school science contexts. 相似文献
14.
15.
Teaching science as explanation is fundamental to reform efforts but is challenging for teachers—especially new elementary teachers, for whom the complexities of teaching are compounded by high demands and little classroom experience. Despite these challenges, few studies have characterized the knowledge, beliefs, and instructional practices that support or hinder teachers from engaging their students in building explanations. To address this gap, this study describes the understandings, purposes, goals, practices, and struggles of one third-year elementary teacher with regard to fostering students' explanation construction. Analyses showed that the teacher had multiple understandings of scientific explanations, believed that fostering students' explanations was important for both teachers and students, and enacted instructional practices that provided opportunities for students to develop explanations. However, she did not consistently take up explanation as a goal in her practice, in part because she did not see explanation construction as a strategy for facilitating the development of students' content knowledge or as an educational goal in its own right. These findings inform the field's understanding of teacher knowledge and practice with regard to one crucial scientific practice and have implications for research on teachers and inquiry-oriented science teaching, science teacher education, and curriculum materials development. 相似文献
16.
The 2015 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) has drawn a substantial amount of attention from science educators and educational policymakers because it marked the first time that PISA assessed students' ability to evaluate and design scientific inquiry using computer-based simulations. We undertook a secondary analysis of the PISA 2015 Taiwan dataset of 7,973 students from 214 schools to identify critical issues of student learning and potentially reshape our educational system and policies. Thus, this study sought to identify potential latent clusters of students' scientific literacy performance according to a set of focus variables selected from the PISA student questionnaires. In addition, significant determinants of students' scientific literacy and resiliency were analyzed. Cluster analysis results demonstrated the presence of four clusters of high, medium, low, and inferior scientific literacy/epistemology/affective dispositions. Specifically, students in cluster 1 compared with other clusters showed that the higher the scientific literacy scores are, the more positive epistemic beliefs about science, achievement motivation, enjoyment of science, interests in broad science, science self-efficacy, information and communications technology (ICT) interest, ICT autonomy, more learning time, more teacher supports and teacher-directed instructions are. Regression results indicated that the most robust predictor of students' scientific literacy performance is epistemic beliefs about science, followed by learning time, interest in broad science topics, achievement motivation, inquiry-based science teaching and learning practice, and science self-efficacy. Decision tree model results showed that the descending order of the variables in terms of their importance in differentiating students as high- versus low-performing were epistemic beliefs about science, learning time, self-efficacy, interest in broad science, and scientific inquiry, respectively. A similar decision tree model to determine students as resilient versus non-resilient also was found. Various interpretations of these results are discussed, as are their implications for science education research, science teaching, and science education policy. 相似文献
17.
Edgar W. Jenkins 《Studies in Science Education》2013,49(1):1-25
Students' questions play an important role in meaningful learning and scientific inquiry. They are a potential resource for both teaching and learning science. Despite the capacity of students' questions for enhancing learning, much of this potential still remains untapped. The purpose of this paper, therefore, is to examine and review the existing research on students' questions and to explore ways of advancing future work into this area. The paper begins by highlighting the importance and role of students' questions from the perspectives of both the learner and the teacher. It then reviews the empirical research on students' questions, with a focus on four areas: (1) the nature and types of these questions; (2) the effects of teaching students questioning skills; (3) the relationship between students' questions and selected variables; and (4) teachers' responses to, and students' perceptions of, students' questions. Following this, some issues and implications of students' questions for classroom instruction are discussed. The paper concludes by suggesting several areas for future research that have significant value for student learning. 相似文献
18.
19.
BETTINA GREIMEL-FUHRMANN ALOIS GEYER 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2003,28(3):229-238
This paper explores the factors that determine the student evaluation of teachers. Unlike many previous studies, the effect of potential biases on global ratings is examined in the context of teaching behaviour (that should in fact--in contrast to the potential biases--have an influence on global ratings). Our research takes into account that biases like the students' interest in the subject or their liking for the teacher may be a result of good teaching behaviour and may not be considered a mere bias of student ratings. Furthermore, it also concentrates on the students' attitudes towards evaluating their teachers. The empirical results are based on qualitative interviews with 40 students at Austrian commercial colleges and on a quantitative survey of 2,121 students who were asked to evaluate their Accounting teachers. Structural equation models show that the students' global ratings of teachers mainly depend on their teaching behaviour. However, global ratings are also affected by the students' attitudes towards evaluating their teachers, as well as by the students' liking for their teacher and their interest in the subject of Accounting. 相似文献
20.
Dealing with representations is a crucial skill for students and such representational competence is essential for learning science. This study analysed the relationship between representational competence and content knowledge, student perceptions of teaching practices concerning the use of different representations, and their impact on students' outcome over a teaching unit. Participants were 931 students in 51 secondary school classes. Representational competence and content knowledge were interactively related. Representational aspects were only moderately included in teaching and students did not develop rich representational competence although content knowledge increased significantly. Multilevel regression showed that student perceptions of interpreting and constructing visual-graphical representations and active social construction of knowledge predicted students' outcome at class level, whereas the individually perceived amount of terms and use of symbolic representations influenced the students' achievement at individual level. Methodological and practical implications of these findings are discussed in relation to the development of representational competence in classrooms. 相似文献