共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
David C. Geary 《Educational Psychology Review》1998,10(4):377-387
Byrnes and Fox (1998) provide a useful and important overview of the ways in which cognitive neuroscientific research can inform educational research and practice, but leave unanswered the question: What is the function of mind and brain? An understanding of the function of mind and brain has implications for research in cognitive neuroscience and in educational psychology, and a number of these implications are spelled out in this comment. 相似文献
2.
The Educational Relevance of Research in Cognitive Neuroscience 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
The benefits of incorporating findings from cognitive neuroscience into the field of educational psychology are considered. The first section begins with arguments against the idea that one can ignore the brain when positing a model of student learning or motivation. The second section describes limitations in the methods used to reveal brain-cognition relations. In the third section, properties of the brain and brain development are described. The fourth section summarizes the cognitive neuroscientific research on attention, memory, reading, and math. Finally, areas of future research in cognitive neuroscience are suggested that would help answer important questions about individual and developmental differences in student learning. 相似文献
3.
按照传统心理学的观点,只有人类才有思维和意识活动,因为思维是意识的核心,而意识必须以语言为中介。认知神经科学对失语症患者的研究发现,意识和思维并不完全依赖于语言,语言缺失只对扩展的意识产生影响,而对核心意识未造成损害。即使没有语言的参与,失语症患者仍然能够产生某种有表象的、非言语的意识活动。认知神经科学的研究向传统的心理学观点提出挑战:意识活动既统一又相对独立,并非只有人类才有意识,意识并非仅以语言为基础,并非脑的所有活动都与意识有关,很多脑活动都是无意识的。 相似文献
4.
神经精神分析学是一个在整合神经科学与精神分析学的基础上而形成的新兴的跨学科研究领域.神经精神分析学运用神经科学的方法与成果,试图检验、修正、扩展、完善弗洛伊德精神分析学,来实现对人类深层心理的动态研究.作为通过整合神经科学与精神分析学来理解大脑与心灵运动的神经精神分析学正处于起步发展的阶段,其所涉及的核心议题主要集中在意识问题、情绪问题、睡眠与梦问题这三大领域.神经精神分析学既是一个新兴的交叉学科,也是一场学术运动.神经精神分析学体现了科学精神与人文精神的融合统一,在总体上符合时代发展的必然趋势,具有积极的启示意义. 相似文献
5.
柯文涌 《科学技术哲学研究》2021,38(2):40-45
破除意识的神秘性,使得意识成为可科学理解的物理或生物现象是秉承科学主义传统的当代心灵哲学、认知科学和脑神经科学等多学科一直不懈努力的哲学——科学议题。鉴于笛卡尔哲学中的意识概念并未真正经过理性法庭的审判,使得意识祛魅具有不彻底性,还原论者开始了意识的科学还原和概念取消多种进路尝试。笛卡尔主义者内格尔针对还原主义论证提出现象学论证,由此指明意识还原的科学纲领在方法论上同样犯了范畴错误,即在科学的还原过程中遗漏掉主观性。还原论者忙于通过修改物理本体论承诺来消除主观性难题,结果为神秘主义、突现论和目的论开了方便之门。 相似文献
6.
关于认知或心智机制的探讨,自古希腊以来就没有停止过,因为这个问题实质上是心身问题的深化。针对此问题的观点有多种,认知涌现论是认知科学产生后出现的一种新观点。然而,涌现(emergence)一词有多种含义,不同学科对它的理解也不尽相同。而且,涌现论本身与不同时期的科学主题的结合,形成了各种类型的涌现论——进化涌现论、机体涌现论、系统生成涌现论、社会涌现论等。随着复杂科学、心灵哲学、神经科学和认知科学的发展,涌现论进入到认知或心智领域,形成了认知涌现论,一种具有交互性、生成性、整体适应性特征的本体论唯物主义。事实上,认知涌现论是基于神经科学对心智或意识机制进行解释的意识整体论。 相似文献
7.
Shannon Rodgers 《Educational Philosophy and Theory》2016,48(6):563-578
If educators presuppose that brain and mind are synonymous, perhaps it is out of necessity. Such an equivalency might be required in order for mind to be accessible, knowable and a ‘thing’ like the brain is. Such a presupposition, that mind is a thing which we can understand nonetheless rests on an insecure foundation. As suggested by philosopher John Searle in the opening quotation, this might explain the historical and present day interest in metaphors of mind, where comparisons to unlike things are used to help philosophers, psychologists, and educators more securely understand how mind really ‘works.’ Educators have an enormous investment in explicating how mind works, as they are required to observe and measure what is going on in the minds of students. In practice, mind has to be a thing for how does one reasonably talk about accomplishing such requirements if mind is merely some philosophical abstraction? This article will explore two metaphors of mind suggesting that embedded within each are presuppositions of epistemological and pedagogical significance. 相似文献
8.
Educational tools claiming to use “right‐brain techniques” are increasingly shaping school curricula. By implying a strong scientific basis, such approaches appeal to educators who rightly believe that knowledge of the brain should guide curriculum development. However, the notion of hemisphericity (idea that people are “left‐brained” or “right‐brained”) is a neuromyth that was debunked in the scientific literature 25 years ago. This article challenges the validity of “right‐brain” teaching, highlighting the fact that neuroscientific research does not support its claims. Providing teachers with a basic understanding of neuroscience research as part of teacher training would enable more effective evaluation of brain‐based claims and facilitate the adoption of tools validated by rigorous independent research rather than programs based on pseudoscience. 相似文献
9.
David Perkins 《Mind, Brain, and Education》2009,3(3):170-175
What does contemporary neuroscience offer educational practice? The promise seems immense, as we come to understand better how the brain learns. However, critics caution that only a few concrete implications for practice have emerged, nowhere near a rewrite of the craft of teaching and learning. How then can we understand better the relationship between neuroscience and educational practice? It is argued here that to speak to the classroom neuroscience has to shout across two gaps. The first and most familiar are different levels of explanation. The second concerns the epistemological contrast between explanation theories and action theories, roughly the contrast between basic science on the one hand and engineering science and craft on the other. Just as we do not expect Newton's laws in their fundamental generality to deliver specific designs for pocket watches and grandfather clocks, neither should we expect fundamental neuroscience to radically redesign particular practices of teaching and learning grounded in educational research and experience. 相似文献
10.
Clara B. Beatley 《Religious education (Chicago, Ill.)》2013,108(4):324-325
This article introduces a relationship between neuroscience and creativity for the sake of religious education. Citing creativity as a process that involves both originality and value, the writing articulates Howard Gardner's interplay between the talent of the person, the internal demands of a discipline, and the quality judgment of the field. The article explores creativity expressed both within the field of neuroscience, with the beginning of the neurocentric era, and continuing with contemporary use of technology. It then surveys neuroscience's own exploration of the fields of creativity and religious experience, with ensuing limitations. The article establishes a dialogue between religious education and neuroscience, demonstrating how religious education provides neuroscience theory with grounded practice while also supplying ethical frameworks for neuroscience practice. It closes asserting that while currently neuroscience primarily endorses sound educational practice, future neuroscientific research should yield fresh horizons demanding ongoing creativity by religious educators. 相似文献
11.
Jo Ann Heydenfeldt 《Performance Improvement》2010,49(7):33-37
Are neuroscientific principles relevant in efforts to manage change successfully? This article provides a case that demonstrates how persistent and purposeful attentional focus, as described by neuroscience, can help overcome human resistance to change and generate creative and successful solutions. A change management perspective growing out of fresh neurological insights into human behavior is also discussed. 相似文献
12.
Rockey Knox 《Mind, Brain, and Education》2016,10(1):4-9
The emerging field of mind, brain, and education (MBE) is grappling with core issues associated with its identity, scope, and method. This article examines some of the most pressing issues that structure the development of MBE as a transdisciplinary effort. Rather than representing the ongoing debates in MBE as superficial squabbles to eventually be “overcome,” this article argues that the politics of MBE language, discourse, and validity suggest profound epistemological differences that transcend a traditional interdisciplinary approach. Instead, MBE would benefit from a transdisciplinary approach that contextually accords equal and differential weight to a range of knowledge inputs from education studies, neuroscience, and other academic and practitioner spheres beneath the broad umbrella of MBE. Specifically, this article suggests that some of the key tasks for those involved in MBE studies require a transdisciplinary approach to knowledge translation and knowledge development. 相似文献
13.
ABSTRACT— Although many articles have addressed the relationship of neuroscience and education at a theoretical level, none has considered as a practical matter how one integrates neuroscientific data into a behavioral theory that uses hypothetical constructs. We describe 4 techniques by which researchers may do so: (a) direct observation of hypothetical constructs in the brain, (b) validation of hypothetical constructs through brain imaging, (c) using neural architecture to infer a behavioral architecture, and (d) using well-developed knowledge of brain function to select among competing behavioral theories. A detailed examination of these 4 techniques indicates that they are amenable to educational research and, indeed, have been used to inform research and theory. We argue that these techniques are not applicable to all educational research problems, but rather they are appropriate to relatively low-level behaviors (e.g., reading) rather than complex behaviors (e.g., classroom management). 相似文献
14.
Howard Gardner 《Mind, Brain, and Education》2020,14(1):2-4
The term “neuromyth” is becoming part of discourse in the field of mind, brain, and education. In this article, I review some problematic aspects of the practice, critique specific examples, and propose an alternative way of communicating with the public about findings in psychology and neuroscience. 相似文献
15.
Miriam Rosenberg‐Lee 《Mind, Brain, and Education》2018,12(1):12-22
The promise of educational neuroscience lies in its potential to uncover mechanistic insights into the science of learning. However, to realize that promise, the field must overcome a fundamental difference between the constituent disciplines: neuroscience is primarily concerned with understanding how the brain works; whereas education attempts to change the brain regardless of its workings. Learning is one domain where these orientations align: it is a deep feature of nervous systems and a target outcome of education. This article proposes coupling training studies with neuroimaging to assess the impact of real‐world learning on brain activity patterns, and simultaneously ask fundamental questions about the causal role of specific patterns of brain activity in academic skill acquisition. Finally, planning and implementing these studies requires multiple forms of expertise and collaborating across disciplines, which will contribute to a more cohesive educational neuroscience research community. 相似文献
16.
Bruno della Chiesa Vanessa Christoph and Christina Hinton 《Mind, Brain, and Education》2009,3(1):17-26
ABSTRACT— The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development's (OECD) Center for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI) carried out the Learning Sciences and Brain Research project (1999–2007) to investigate how neuroscience research can inform education policy and practice. This transdisciplinary project brought many challenges. Within the political community, participation in the project varied, with some countries resisting approval of the project altogether, in the beginning. In the neuroscientific community, participants struggled to represent their knowledge in a way that would be meaningful and relevant to educators. Within the educational community, response to the project varied, with many educational researchers resisting it for fear that neuroscience research might make their work obsolete. Achieving dialogue among these communities was even more challenging. One clear obstacle was that participants had difficulty recognizing tacit knowledge in their own field and making this knowledge explicit for partners in other fields. This article analyzes these challenges through a knowledge management framework. 相似文献
17.
Lakoff & Johnson采用基于概念结构的隐喻认知机制处理语言与其它认知观的关系,从而提出概念隐喻理 论。概念隐喻理论对语言与认知进行某种合理的融合,从源域到靶域的映射机制实现了对经验事件的结构化和概念化。然而,概念隐喻理论基本是通过语言使用现象来揭示思维的本质,缺乏对隐喻概念产生和识解大脑内在工作机制 的理解与描写。为弥补概念隐喻理论的不足,近年来学界把概念隐喻机制的研究拓展到神经科学层面,这为处理隐喻 表达与大脑认知机制的关系及其科学的实验方法提供了可能,具有较为明显的理论和方法优势。本文简要论述神经隐喻理论的发展历程及主要内容,并在此基础上对神经隐喻理论的应用前景作出展望。 相似文献
18.
Richard Aldrich 《History of education》2013,42(3):396-410
This article has two purposes. The first is to bring current developments in neuroscience, including educational neuroscience, to the attention of historians of education. The second is to demonstrate how historians of education, in common with philosophers, psychologists and sociologists, can contribute to this new field. Education has replaced natural selection in human evolution. Symbolic representations, speech, memory, writing, printing, screen-based communications and various mood-changing activities have shaped and are continuing to shape the human brain. It is argued here that by taking a longer historical perspective and recognising the brain as a palimpsest or kluge, historians of education can help to explain the limitations of neuroplasticity and some of the fundamental problems that beset formal educational systems. Just as education needs to be afforded a more central role in the history of human evolution, so the brain needs to be given a more central role in the history of education. 相似文献
19.
Investigating the Educational Implications of Embodied Cognition: A Model Interdisciplinary Inquiry in Mind,Brain, and Education Curricula 
下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 Elisabeth Osgood‐Campbell 《Mind, Brain, and Education》2015,9(1):3-9
Much educational neuroscience research investigates connections between cognition, neuroscience, and educational theory and practice without reference to the body. In contrast, proponents of embodied cognition posit that the bodily action and perception play a central role in cognitive development. Some researchers within the field of Mind, Brain, and Education (MBE) explore this theory by researching the impact of sensorimotor activity on academic competencies such as language comprehension, mathematics, and scientific thinking. In this article, I call for this work to be highlighted more centrally in MBE training programs. Toward this end, I model an investigation of the concept of embodied cognition that can be used in MBE curricula with a dual purpose: to train future practitioners in the seminal metaphor of mind as an embodied system, and to demonstrate effective interdisciplinary research, which is critical to advancing the field of Mind, Brain, and Education. 相似文献
20.
Chia-Ju Liu Wen-Wei Chiang 《International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education》2014,12(3):629-646
This report provides an overview of neuroscience research that is applicable for science educators. It first offers a brief analysis of empirical studies in educational neuroscience literature, followed by six science concept learning constructs based on the whole brain theory: gaining an understanding of brain function; pattern recognition and consciousness; mind maps, mnemonics and other learning devices; concrete multisensory experience; higher-order creative reasoning via a multimedia-infused environment and positive emotion in educational settings. It is vital to the future of results-based education that discoveries regarding the cognitive learning process are taken into consideration when designing instruction. This research offers science educators neuroscience-backed information as a foundation to develop results-oriented curricula and teaching methods. Future research could further extend an empirically driven education system. 相似文献