共查询到19条相似文献，搜索用时 227 毫秒
1.
朱镜人 《河北师范大学学报(教育科学版)》2010,12(7)
强调精英的社会责任,崇尚务实进取,推崇理性和诚信,主张渐进的变革和重视名誉,是英国绅士文化的特征.在"优秀教学"概念内涵的变化、大学教学质量理论研究和制度建设、质量评估的务实态度、院校自我监控和评估客观公正等五个方面,绅士文化对英国大学教学质量评估产生了深刻影响.绅士文化强化了英国大学教学的质量意识,演变成英国注重大学教学质量的传统,有形无形地发挥着大学教学质量保证的作用. 相似文献
2.
建立完善的教学质量监控体系是教学质量控制的重要保证。通过对英国大学现行教学质量监控体系的范例研究,探索我国高等教育大众化条件下地方院校教学质量监控体系的重新构建,强调学校应在自律的基础上,重视外界对学校内部教学质量监控体系的有机介入,整合吸纳社会公众和中介组织的评价信息,以实现地方本科院校教学质量监控体系的优化和创新。 相似文献
3.
影响英国大学科研评估制度诞生的宏观因素包括大学的自治传统、新公共管理思潮、撒切尔主义和高等教育大众化。科研评估在1986年诞生之后,出现了"路径依赖"现象,而该制度路径选择的实质是对当时英国经济领域市场化改革路径的依赖。2008年是英国大学科研评估的"关键节点",此制度被卓越科研框架取而代之。 相似文献
4.
英国大学校内质量保证的主要举措及其特点 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
王嘉毅 《清华大学教育研究》2009,30(3)
英国大学以高质量著称,其主要经验是学校内部高度重视质量保证.学校主要通过将人才培养视为学校首要任务,建立完善的质量管理制度,设立专人负责质量保证与质量提高,严格审核专业设置与课程开设,严格教学过程、考试与评价,建立良好的学习支持系统,经常性的教师、学生反馈,设立教学改革项目和优秀教学奖励项目以及邀请校外同行专家开展诊断与评估等措施保证学校教学质量. 相似文献
5.
科研评估制度（RAE）是英国高等教育现代化过程的重要组成部分,对于一向崇尚学术自由和大学自治的英国大学产生了相当大的影响。英国大学的相关行动者在科研评估制度实施后,主要采取了＂算计路径＂和＂文化路径＂两种应对战略和措施。在科研评估制度与大学相关行动者的互动中,制度对行为发挥了重要影响。 相似文献
6.
科研评估制度(RAE)是英国高等教育现代化过程的重要组成部分,对于一向崇尚学术自由和大学自治的英国大学产生了相当大的影响。英国大学的相关行动者在科研评估制度实施后,主要采取了"算计路径"和"文化路径"两种应对战略和措施。在科研评估制度与大学相关行动者的互动中,制度对行为发挥了重要影响。 相似文献
7.
在外部教学评估的强有力推动下,高校内部教学评估作为保证教学质量和迎接外部评估的最基础环节．日益受到重视。本文阐述了建立内部评估体系的意叉,通过分析影响高校内部教学质量的因素,构建了本科教学工作内部评估机制,建立了包括专业评估、课程评估、实验教学评估、学生培养质量评估、教学管理评估及毕业设计（论文）评估的评估体系,对高校的教学质量进行了系统化评估。 相似文献
8.
提高高等学校教学质量监控力度的思考 总被引：6，自引：0，他引：6
高等学校要保证教学工作,提高教学质量,必须建立完善的政府、高校和社会有机结合的高等教育教学质量保障体系。共阐述了三个方面的问题:外部教学质量保障可通过政府建立合理的评估制度来进行引导、激励;学校内部教学质量监控体系的基本框架;高校了解社会对教学质量监控的途径。 相似文献
9.
普通高等学校内部建立教学评估长效机制,形成与国家评估政策互动的评估制度体系,不仅是我国高等教育教学改革的必然要求,也是高等学校强化内涵建设和提高教学质量的根本有效途径。实践证明,基于共享的、在时间序列上的梯级递进有效互动的评估制度体系,是地方普通高校内部教学评估长效机制有效模式之一。 相似文献
10.
英国RAE大学科研评估制度述评 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
徐洁 《高等工程教育研究》2008,30(3):137-140
英国自1986年开始推行RAE大学科研评估制度,该制度对促进英国大学的科研水平,促进学科调整等方面起到了积极的作用。但是该制度在评估过程、评估方法和绩效指标的使用上存在不足之处。 相似文献
11.
1997年英国成立了高等教育质量保证署（QAA）,向英国高等教育提供质量保障服务。QAA初期的工作主要是进行延续审查和学科评估,2002年改革后则采用院校审查的方式来进行评估。QAA的建立与发展过程正是英国高等教育外部质量保障机制不断完善的过程,也是其从注重外部质量保障到注重建立有效的内部质量保障的过程。 相似文献
12.
Jethro Newton 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》1999,24(2):215-235
With the establishment, in August 1997, of a new UK‐wide Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA), it is timely to reflect on the impact of the two principal forms of external quality monitoring which the QAA has replaced. First, the quality assessment by the funding councils, whose five‐year cycle of teaching quality assessment in universities and colleges in Scotland and Wales, which commenced in 1993, is now complete. Second, institutional quality audits of universities and colleges, conducted by the Higher Education Quality Council (HEQC) between 1993 and 1997. This paper reports the results of a five‐year action research study conducted at a college of higher education. The particular focus of the study was on issues arising from the development and implementation of a quality assurance system at the study institution, and attempts to reconcile requirements for accountability and efforts to encourage quality improvement. The paper reviews and evaluates the impact of each of the forms of external monitoring, teaching quality assessment and institutional audit, on the study institution. Results are presented using qualitative and quantitative data drawn from external performance measures, such as the Scottish Higher Education Funding Council (SHEFC) and HEQC quality assessment and audit reports, and internal measures of staff experience and perceptions. Lessons are drawn in relation to perceived benefits, or otherwise, of external quality assessment and quality audit, and consideration is given to the implications which the findings have beyond the study institution and the Scottish higher education sector, and in particular for the newly established Quality Assurance Agency. 相似文献
13.
英国高校学科评估的现状分析 总被引：5，自引：0，他引：5
在高等教育大众化、教育资源短缺等因素的影响下,英国在1993～2001年间进行了规模宏大的高校学科评估。学科评估提升了教学在英国大学的地位,但也存在如耗资巨大、评估体系不完善、高校学术自主受到侵蚀等问题。英国从2002年开始的新的质量保证体系“院校审核”试图解决这些问题。英国的学科评估正处于不断改进之中。 相似文献
14.
本文介绍并分析英国高等教育质量保证体系的历史沿革,对当前实行的QAA（The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education）的主要职责、运行模式、框架设计和质量保证进行了分析和评述,对高等学校的内部质量监控做了介绍,并着重以约克大学为例介绍了高等学校的内部质量保障的制度、机构和措施,在此基础上分析了对我国高等教育质量保证的启示。 相似文献
15.
论高校内部审计的全面质量管理 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
宾瑜 《天津职业院校联合学报》2006,8(3):130-133
随着高等学校经济来源、管理活动日趋复杂多样,作为高校经济管理监督的重要手段,内部审计所面临的风险也在日益加大。必须通过全面质量管理来提高审计质量,最大限度地降低高校内部审计的风险。要从分析高校内部审计质量控制的现状入手,从组织机构、制度建设、人员配备、审计项目工作计划、准备、实施、报告、公告等几个方面来全面实施高校内部审计质量管理。 相似文献
16.
There has been, and remains, much criticism of the external monitoring of the quality of universities’ learning and teaching by bodies such as the QAA largely on the grounds that it is essentially a bureaucratic collection of data that does little, if anything, to help in improving or enhancing the learning and teaching. In this article, while recognizing the force of much of this criticism, we argue that external monitoring of quality can be related to enhancement if incorporated into the university's own well-developed procedures for monitoring and enhancement and if the university has specialist staff who are not distinct from but closely involved in the development of its academic work. 相似文献
17.
高校学生评价直接影响高校教育教学质量。全文较详细地比较了英国高等教育质量保证署发表的《高等教育学术质量和标准保证的实践准则》第六部分：学生评价的第一版和第二版,以为我国高校的学生评价的建设提供相应参考。 相似文献
18.
George O. Odhiambo 《高等教育研究与发展》2014,33(5):978-991
Quality assurance (QA) mechanisms used to be highly dependent on national administrative traditions but nowadays there is a convergence of mechanisms. Compared to more developed higher education (HE) systems in the world, QA systems in Africa are still at an infant stage and thus confronted by many challenges. The purpose of this article is to present some of the findings derived from a study analysing the crucial issues and unique challenges facing Kenya's public HE as it struggles to develop QA mechanisms. Using purposive sampling, the researcher chose two public universities who indicated their willingness to participate and a national QA Agency (QAA). The study was done through in-depth interviews and a review of historical materials and records. Overall, respondents strongly emphasised the need for Kenyan universities to have compulsory and effective external and internal QA mechanisms. They indicated that the trends facing HE make it necessary for HE in Kenya to review their traditional QA structures and to create new systems of external QA. The numerous comments in this research indicate deficiency not only in the QAA focus and work but also in the internal QA frameworks within public universities. 相似文献
19.
DAVID LAUGHTON 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2003,28(3):309-321
This article will review and evaluate the response of academics working in higher education institutions (HEIs) in the UK to the experience of teaching quality review. It will do so by gathering the viewpoints and opinions of academics from a particular source over a specific time period: the Times Higher Education Supplement (THES) between January and August of 2001. Before presenting and then evaluating these viewpoints, the paper will discuss the development of teaching quality assessment methodologies in UK HE within the context of the increasing importance and embededness of quality assurance and enhancement values and processes within the practices of HEIs. It is argued that this is both a recent and contested phenomenon. The article finds that the concerns of academics with the teaching quality review exercise fall under a number of headings: (1) administrative/cost burden; (2) grade inflation/gamesmanship/ organisational learning; (3) elitist bias within the system; (4) system impact of quality review; (5) reliability of the system; and (6) philosophical objections to the system. The implications of these concerns are discussed. The article's conclusion is that if academics are not convinced of, or do not actively support, the values and methodologies associated with teaching quality review, then there is little chance that these will either produce accurate or meaningful assessments of teaching quality, or act as a spur to the quality enhancement of this aspect of individual and institutional activity. This is an important point within the context of the recent review of the Quality Assurance Agency's Subject Review methodology, and the new institutional audit methodology. 相似文献