共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 125 毫秒
1.
2.
图书馆学理论研究可以以管理学为参照,从理论研究、研究方法和图书馆学研究主体等方面,管理学研究为图书馆学理论研究带来一些启示。 相似文献
3.
4.
论文从方法论体系、一般研究方法、哲学方法、图书馆学专门方法以及移植法等方面对2000年以来我国图书馆学方法论的研究现状进行述评,并就其今后的研究重点和研究方法提出了一些建议. 相似文献
5.
本文以美国常春藤大学图书馆研究数据管理服务(Research Data Management Services,RDMS)为例,通过网站调查、文献研究、电子邮件咨询、电话访谈等方法,从服务组织、服务内容、服务方式3个维度进行调查分析。同时,针对国内高校图书馆RDMS的现状与问题,提出一些思路和建议:提高RDMS意识,制定研究数据管理的服务政策;加大对RDMS基础设施的投入,打造RDMS平台;明确服务目标,扩大RDMS服务范围;组建专家团队,提升RDMS服务水平。 相似文献
6.
本文回顾和总结了30年来中国大陆传播学交叉学科研究的主要学术成就,研究特点和问题、不足。认为中国大陆传播学交叉学科研究成果丰富,研究特点是:一、本土化探索一直启发着传播学交叉研究的创新思维;二、密切关注现实问题使得许多交叉研究领域日益成为当前传播学发展的重点和前沿;三、交叉研究出现了多学科融合和再分化趋势,同时也更加集中地体现在几大学科领域之中。问题与不足在于:一、一些交叉研究深度浅尝辄止,重复和依赖国外成果现象较突出;二、研究方法相对单一,具有实用性倾向;三、交叉研究已涉足很多领域,但诸领域发展不够均衡。 相似文献
7.
图书情报学研究要讲究规范与方法 总被引：5，自引：0，他引：5
确立学术规范，对于深化图书情报学研究具有重要意义。本文在批语一些不规范现象的同时，提出有利于图书情报学术规范化的做法。掌握和运用好科学的研究方法，是通向规范化的最重要的途径。本文概述了思辨研究、定性研究和定量研究的各自特征及其适用范围，并介绍了图书情报学中的一些重要方法，如逻辑方法、观察方法、社会调查方法、实验方法、个案研究方法和比较研究方法。 相似文献
8.
本文初步分析了近代目录学的历史分期;研究近代目录学的理论意义和实践价值;最后,探讨了近代目录学的一些有限显性特征。 相似文献
9.
我国情报学研究的历史回顾(Ⅱ) 总被引：9，自引：1，他引：8
在前面系列文章的基础之上,本文回顾了我国情报学在学科研究内容、哲学基础、研究范式及研究方法四个方面的研究状况以及所取得的成果,提出了自己的一些认识和看法。希望通过这样的学科回顾,找到我国情报学未来的发展路径。 相似文献
10.
中外档案学研究特点之比较 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
本文运用数据统计的方法对中外档案学研究成果进行了调研。通过调研,笔者得到一些结论和启示,即中外档案学是国际档案学的两朵奇葩,各有千秋,各具特色。主要表现在研究内容、研究主体、研究方法等方面。具体来讲:档案学研究内容上有面与点的区别,档案学研究主体上有高校档案专业教师为主和档案实际工作者为主的区别,档案学研究方法上有定性描述和实证研究的区别。对我们的启示是:今后中国档案学研究中还应当注意借鉴外国先进的研究理念和研究方法,以提高其研究水平,推动我国档案事业健康快速的发展。 相似文献
11.
[目的/意义]研究方法在学术研究中发挥着至关重要的作用。确认图书馆情报学领域主要的研究方法，并对它们进行了解熟悉，以在开展研究时能合理选择、灵活使用，确保研究质量。[方法/过程]对近2 000篇图书馆情报学领域的研究文献以及相关研究方法论文进行内容分析，在此基础上对研究方法的类分命名、图书馆情报学界主要的研究方法的确定、特点和使用注意事项进行介绍和讨论。[结果/结论]研究方法应以数据收集法而不是数据分析法命名。图书馆情报学领域常用的研究方法包括实验法、问卷法、理论研讨法、内容分析法、访谈法和书目计量法，每种方法都有各自的特点。因而在选择使用时，既应根据具体研究课题及研究方法之特性，也要考虑使用注意事项，并尽量在同一研究中采用两种或更多的方法，以扬长避短，更有效地展开研究。 相似文献
12.
13.
《The Journal of Academic Librarianship》2020,46(5):102217
The meta-synthesis method has received increased interest in social science research, but relatively few meta-synthesis studies have been conducted in the library and information science (LIS) field. The purpose of this study was to analyze 44 LIS-related meta-synthesis studies in terms of contribution, meta-synthesis methodology, and research topics. The results revealed that there are four types of contributions of meta-synthesis research: isolated findings, non-dynamic relationships, dynamic relationships, and models. Moreover, a variety of methods have been used to search, select, analyze, and synthesize the individual studies. Finally, although meta-synthesis studies have been conducted on some LIS topics (e.g., health informatics, library user services, and information management), it has been an undervalued method for other research topics. Recommendations are offered to encourage the use of this method and to guide researchers to conduct more rigorous meta-synthesis studies on LIS topics. 相似文献
14.
文章回顾了国内外图书馆学研究对实验法的应用,在此基础上,考察了实验法应用于图书馆学研究的优势,并对其局限性及其认识论根源进行了分析。结合图书馆学的具体研究领域,分析了实验法的应用前景,并对基于设计的研究(Design-based Research)和混合方法研究(Mixed Methods Research)进行了简要评析。 相似文献
15.
The purpose of this article is to explore the use of mixed methods research (MMR) in articles published in library and information science (LIS) journals in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) from 2004 to 2008. A mixed methods research framework provided in the methodological literature is used to determine how this method was practiced within the LIS scientific community in SSA. Six hundred and eighty five articles published in nine peer-reviewed LIS journals in SAA were reviewed, finding the dominant research methods in these journals to be survey designs and historical research. The use of MMR was limited: 48 out of 685 articles used the mixed methods approaches that were identified in the methodological literature. A paradigm shift and a change of mindset are recommended for LIS researchers in SSA so that they may exploit the advantages offered by mixed methods research in conducting their studies. 相似文献
16.
Research methods are applied in all kinds of studies, though no consensus exists regarding what constitutes a research method and how research methods should be categorized. Over 1900 research articles were obtained from three major journals published between 2001 and 2010 in library and information science (LIS). Each selected article was coded using a schema of research methods developed in this study. The coded data, along with related publications, were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. This exploration shows that research methods comprise data collection techniques (e.g., interview, observation) and data analysis techniques (e.g., qualitative, quantitative). Research methods should perhaps be categorized by data collection technique, as it makes more sense than if research methods are labeled as qualitative or quantitative. This study is one of the many efforts to facilitate a better understanding of research methods in LIS and help scholars make more informed decisions about research method selection in their endeavors. Its implications can be extended to LIS research education, training, and advocacy. Because research methods themselves are not discipline-specific, researchers beyond the LIS field would benefit from this study as well. 相似文献
17.
《Library & information science research》2020,42(1):101003
Mixed methods research is gaining prominence in the library and information science (LIS) discipline. However, according to previous analyses, few LIS studies utilized mixed methods research, and the researchers did not recognize or describe them as such. The present methodological review assesses the current state of mixed methods research in LIS. Eighty-four articles published between 2017 and 2018 and indexed in two core LIS databases, match the common definition of mixed methods. Out of those, 65 articles self-identified as mixed methods were analyzed focusing on reporting and conduct, specifically, the integration of quantitative and qualitative components. Review results suggest that more efforts are needed to raise awareness about using and reporting mixed methods research in LIS. This review provides guidance for future work and contributes to the discussion on how we can further improve methodological rigor, research training, and reproducibility in LIS. 相似文献
18.
Serap Kurbanoglu 《International Information and Library Review》2013,45(4):252-256
The purpose of this article is to explore the use of mixed methods research (MMR) in articles published in library and information science (LIS) journals in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) from 2004 to 2008. A mixed methods research framework provided in the methodological literature is used to determine how this method was practiced within the LIS scientific community in SSA. Six hundred and eighty five articles published in nine peer-reviewed LIS journals in SAA were reviewed, finding the dominant research methods in these journals to be survey designs and historical research. The use of MMR was limited: 48 out of 685 articles used the mixed methods approaches that were identified in the methodological literature. A paradigm shift and a change of mindset are recommended for LIS researchers in SSA so that they may exploit the advantages offered by mixed methods research in conducting their studies. 相似文献
19.
国外图书情报类期刊热点主题及发展趋势研究 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
利用自组织映射(SOM)人工神经网络方法分析60种有代表性的国外图书情报类期刊的热点主题及Journal of Information Science(JIS)从1981-2007年的主题发展趋势。利用改进的SOM输出方式——属性叠加矩阵,识别出60种期刊的7类热点主题,并构造一种新的SOM显示方式“热点属性投影”, 结合常见的U-matrix图,分析JIS期刊的热点主题在过去27年间的发展过程与规律。其研究结果在一定程度上可以反映国外图书情报类期刊主题的发展规律。该研究方法为期刊热点主题识别及发展趋势研究提供较为完整的工具与思路。 相似文献
20.
Ashlynn Kogut 《The Journal of Academic Librarianship》2019,45(2):137-145
Connecting academic libraries to the higher education environment is crucial for demonstrating the impact of libraries on student success. The purpose of this study is to examine the information transfer between the disciplines of library and information science (LIS) and higher education in order to evaluate the influence of ideas between the two disciplines. Information transfer was analyzed in 39 articles focused on the library's contributions to student success by examining the cited references, the author and collaborator affiliations, and the forward citations. The findings from the cited reference analysis suggest that LIS is borrowing concepts and methods through citations from the discipline of education. Authorship affiliations showed that some non-LIS authors are publishing in the field of LIS and that LIS authors are collaborating with non-LIS authors. Finally, based on the forward citations, other disciplines are rarely citing LIS research about student success. This article's findings highlight the need to consider research and collaborators outside of the LIS field when researching the library's contribution to student success. 相似文献