共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 281 毫秒
1.
2.
侯成旭 《中学数学教学参考》2023,(15):13-14
新课程理念要求在数学教学评价体系中既要关注对学生学习结果的评价,更要关注对学生思维水平、认知能力、数学思想的评价。SOLO分类评价体系可以有效地观察到学生的思维层次和学习结果。将SOLO分类评价体系应用于高中数学教学中可以提高教师对学生的评估方式,为学生的进一步发展提供保障。 相似文献
3.
4.
跨学科学习有助于弥补分科教学的缺陷,促进学生跨学科理解形成和创新人才培养。学生评价是落实跨学科学习目标、设计高质量教学活动、促进跨学科教学改进的关键环节。跨学科学习评价一般以表现性评价为主,其他评价方式为辅。跨学科学习评价内容需要具备完整的评价要素,其学习水平划分应以认知模型为依据。基于SOLO分类理论构建跨学科学习评价认知模型,有助于教师设计合理的表现性评价任务,明确对学生任务表现的观察点,基于收集的证据对学生的认知层次和学习成果水平作出科学评价。 相似文献
5.
SOLO 分类理论是通过观察学生在完成评价任务过程中显示的认知能力和思维情况,逐级递进划分层次。运用该理论可以对高中生地理区域认知能力评价进行层级划分,并指导教学。本文通过预设学习目标、设计评价任务,根据学习表现评价认知能力和思维水平等三个步骤,阐述基于 SOLO 分类理论对学生的区域认知能力进行评价。 相似文献
6.
SOLO分类理论与物理核心素养水平相互融合,有助于教师在课堂教学设计过程中确定核心素养教学目标,有助于分析学生学习过程中的认知负荷和最近发展区,有助于采取有效的课堂教学策略。以"力的合成"教学为例,说明用SOLO分类理论指导基于核心素养水平培养的教学设计是可行的。 相似文献
7.
8.
9.
SOLO分类评价法是一种以评价学生高级思维能力为目标的评价方法。SOLO分类评价方法作为评价学生学习质量的新方式,能有效地评价学生的真实学习情况,体现了促进学生发展的基本理念,为建构科学的课程评价机制提供了一个崭新的突破口。 相似文献
10.
许晓燕 《读与写:教育教学刊》2009,6(7):191-192
SOLO分类评价法是一种以等级描述为基本特征的质性评价方法.本文试图将SOLO分类法应用于英语阅读评价之中,通过对学生阅读时思维结构的复杂程度进行检测,以达到区分学生不同的阅读水平,帮助教师掌握学生的认知发展状况,提高阅读教学的有效性. 相似文献
11.
基于新课程改革评价既要强调关注学生学习结果,也要关注其学习过程,特别是对学生思维过程的评价,文中介绍了一种在国外已有深入研究与实践、可运用于学生思维评价的质性评价方法——SOLO分类评价法在显微镜技能教学与管理中的应用。它能帮助教师评价、照顾学生异质性、改进教学方法与技能评价等。 相似文献
12.
SOLO分类法在教学评价中的应用 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
SOLO分类法是一种新的评价理论,它在教学评价中的应用值得深入研究。通过研究,在阐述其理论的基础上,探讨了SOLO分类法对学习理论的贡献：把“阶段”观念迁移到具体的学习任务,使之能应用到教学实践;解释了功能方式的转换,克服了布鲁姆教育目标分类学的理论困难。教学评价中的应用：为评价学习的质量提供了一种更为有效的方法;为不同学科的教学评价构建了一个比较学习质量的共同平台;为开放性试题的评分提供了理论依据。 相似文献
13.
Gillian Boulton-Lewis 《Higher Education》1994,28(3):387-402
This paper is a report of the analysis of statements by 869 students and their 21 lecturers in 12 courses in 5 Faculties in the Queensland University of Technology (QUT). The students and lecturers were asked to write a page about learning. The objectives were to collect data to devise a taxonomy of levels of knowledge of learning held by tertiary students and lecturers and to use this to describe student knowledge to lecturers as a basis for planning for teaching. The statements were categorised, using the SOLO Taxonomy as a model (c.f., Biggs and Collis 1982, 1989), by two trained researchers and checked by the author and a consultant. The majority of responses for both students and lecturers were multistructural. A MANOVA for SOLO levels by deep, surface and achieving motives and strategies showed that as SOLO levels increased surface motives declined and deep motives and strategies assumed more importance. The key concepts in learning identified by a random sample of 100 students were further analysed and described for each SOLO level. A SOLO type model of levels of knowledge of learning is proposed, based on the structure of the responses. 相似文献
14.
Mark Jones Gisela van Kessel Laura Swisher Jason Beckstead Ian Edwards 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2014,39(1):1-20
Assessment of student learning in complex areas is challenging, particularly when there is interest in students’ deeper understanding and connectivity of concepts. Assessment of ethics learning has been limited by lack of consensus regarding what is effective and an overfocus on quantification at the expense of clinical or ethical relevance. Cognitive maps provide one means to evaluate depth and personal meaning of students’ ethics knowledge. A pre-/post-test design using cognitive maps and the structure of observed learning outcome (SOLO) taxonomy was used to assess student learning on completion of a six-week intensive ethics course. Thirty-seven students completed the research. Student learning was supported by significant changes in component (content, labelling, relationships and structure/visual message), and total pre- and post-test cognitive map scores, and significant change in pre- and post-test SOLO scores. A strong relationship was found between cognitive map improvement and SOLO improvement. Student written commentaries describing their post-test cognitive map provided a richer, more elaborated account of their understanding that qualitatively enhanced their cognitive maps. Cognitive maps offer an alternative to traditional ethics assessment strategies. 相似文献
15.
16.
Applying the Structure of the Observed Learning Outcomes (SOLO) Taxonomy on Student's Learning Outcomes: An empirical study 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
Charles C. Chan M. S. Tsui Mandy Y. C. Chan Joe H. Hong 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2002,27(6):511-527
This article explores the application of different educational taxonomies in measuring students' cognitive learning outcomes. The objectives were to compare three educational taxonomies--namely, the Structure of the Observed Learning Outcomes (SOLO) taxonomy, Bloom's taxonomy and reflective thinking measurement model--and to test the application value of these taxonomies. A comparative literature review was conducted to provide an underlying conceptual framework. Recommendations from this review were examined experimentally. Scripts of long essay papers and short classroom discussion responses were analyzed by the modified versions of the taxonomies. It was found that SOLO is suitable for measuring different kinds of learning outcomes. However, finer categorization of SOLO levels did not eradicate the problem of SOLO's conceptual ambiguity. It is suggested that the next step of research should be on setting up panels of judges to find out which taxonomy is suitable for measuring what learning outcomes under which contexts. 相似文献
17.
SOLO分类理论及其在教学中的应用 总被引：6，自引：0，他引：6
SOLO分类理论作为新皮亚杰主义的代表,融合了信息加工理论和皮亚杰认知发展理论的优点,基于对大量学科领域学生对问题的反应特点,概括了具体学科领域学生认知能力发展的规律。该理论对教学实践有重要的应用价值。 相似文献
18.
罗新胤 《海南广播电视大学学报》2014,(2):146-151
先介绍SOLO分类理论,然后探讨其用于高中历史教学设计时存在的问题。为了更好的用于教学设计,对SOLO分类理论五个层次进行整理,形成"知识获得"、"知识整合使用"、"知识升华"三个层次。在整理后的SOLO三层结构基础上,以高中历史具体的一课内容为例,进行三层教学设计和三步教学。"三层教学设计"以学习过程中思维发展特点为基础,对课本内容进行分类、分层重构;在教学设计基础上进行"三步教学",帮助学生习得基础知识,实现思维层级发展,最终达到全班每个学生进步的效果。 相似文献
19.
John Biggs 《Higher Education》1979,8(4):381-394
This paper is concerned with the relationship between students' study processes and the structural complexity of their learning. Study processes are conceived in terms of three independent dimensions — utilising, internalising and achieving — each of which has a cognitive (strategic) and an affective (motivational) component; these are assessed by the Study Process Questionnaire (SPQ). Learning quality is expressed in terms of the complexity of the Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome by applying the SOLO Taxonomy described below. A preliminary study involving 60 undergraduates' responses to education research abstracts is described, in which SOLO levels and short and long term retention of factual material are related to their study processes. 相似文献
20.
Dr Lynda J. Creedy 《Research in Science Education》1993,23(1):34-41
This paper examines the continuation of a study investigating senior secondary students' understanding of concepts in biology.
In this study, year 11 student understandings of natural selection were examined by questionnaire using different question
formats. The SOLO taxonomy of Biggs and Collis (1982) was used as the theoretical framework with which the quality of student
learning was assessed.
This paper puts forward the usefulness of the SOLO taxonomy in assessing student understanding in biology in general and in
examining student understanding of the concept of natural selection in particular. The paper goes on to examine the implications
of these results and raises issues which have applicability to criterion-based assessment in secondary science.
Specializations: science and technology education, biology teacher education, applications of multimedia to science education 相似文献