共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 20 毫秒
1.
Raoul Mulder Chi Baik Ryan Naylor Jon Pearce 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2014,39(6):657-677
Involving students in peer review has many pedagogical benefits, but few studies have explicitly investigated relationships between the content of peer reviews, student perceptions and assessment outcomes. We conducted a case study of peer review within a third-year undergraduate subject at a research-intensive Australian university, in which we examined: (1) students’ perceptions of the peer review process before and after peer review, (2) content of the peer reviews and what kinds of feedback were adopted and (3) the effect of participation in peer review on performance (grades) in the assessment task. Students overwhelmingly perceived peer review to be beneficial, and the opportunity to participate in peer review resulted in a significant improvement in the quality of work submitted for assessment. Students who benefited most from peer review were those of below-median performance, and the magnitude of benefit was related to the degree to which students engaged with the peer review process. Our study confirms that participation in peer review can lead to important improvements in performance and learning outcomes. 相似文献
2.
AbstractPeer assessment has proven to have positive learning outcomes. Importantly, peer assessment is a social process and some claim that the use of anonymity might have advantages. However, the findings have not always been in the same direction. Our aims were: (a) to review the effects of using anonymity in peer assessment on performance, peer feedback content, peer grading accuracy, social effects and students’ perspective on peer assessment; and (b) to investigate the effects of four moderating variables (educational level, peer grading, assessment aids, direction of anonymity) in relation to anonymity. A literature search was conducted including five different terms related to peer assessment (e.g., peer feedback) and anonymity. Fourteen studies that used a control group or a within group design were found. The narrative review revealed that anonymous peer assessment seems to provide advantages for students’ perceptions about the learning value of peer assessment, delivering more critical peer feedback, increased self-perceived social effects, a slight tendency for more performance, especially in higher education and with less peer assessment aids. Some conclusions are that: (a) when implementing anonymity in peer assessment the instructional context and goals need to be considered, (b) existent empirical research is still limited, and (c) future research should employ stronger and more complex research designs. 相似文献
3.
提高科技期刊专家审稿质量的途径 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
江国平 《闽西职业技术学院学报》2011,13(3):108-111
为了使专家审稿的过程更加快速有效,从审稿专家的选取、审稿方式和方法的选择、审稿过程的控制等方面对提高科技期刊专家审稿质量的途径进行了分析,只有在正确的审稿专家选择原则的指导下,采用正确的审稿方式和方法,并对审稿过程进行合理的控制,才能使审稿专家对刊物有更加深入的了解,从而更加准确地把握稿件的学术质量。 相似文献
4.
同行评价是科研以及学术评价等常用方式之一·经过对某高校10名评委与9名被评审者的可信度研究表明,同行评价较其他评委的评价更富于严密性与深入性,并具有较好的信度,但评委个体间的不同程度差异,会导致弊病的出现·要提高评价质量,建立严格的可操作性较强的指标体系,引入科学实施方法以及同行评价的再评价是十分重要的· 相似文献
5.
同行评议是研究型大学教师聘任中的一个重要程序,其结论对于教师是否能够得到聘任、职称能否得到晋升具有决定性意义。在我国研究型大学教师同行评议的过程中,内部评议与外部评议、资格审查与同行评议、量化评价与同行评议是尤其需要注意的三对矛盾关系。 相似文献
6.
Between Printed Past and Digital Future 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
Peer review – processes of quality control and certification – is well established in most sciences. In this contribution we limit ourselves to peer review in scientific journals. The main idea of peer review – to keep science free from individuals' and groups' interests and impact, and to select and publish only what is the best in a special field of research – is briefly summarized. Though peer review has a significant impact in the sciences, it is obviously hard to realize its objects. Highly publicized cases of fraud, large amounts of time necessary for the review process, the continued power of old boys' networks, and so forth – such factors led to many debates, and while some demanded to abolish peer review completely, others looked for possibilities to revise the review process. The Internet appears to provide tools to improve the organisation of peer review and to afford the transparency of the review process and its results. But even if the use of the Internet leads to significant changes in peer review there is no value-free scientific knowledge and evaluation that are separate from (predominant and/or competing) paradigms and their proponents. 相似文献
7.
8.
解倩 《淮北职业技术学院学报》2014,(4):98-99
自20世纪70年代起,同伴互评就作为过程写作法的重要环节受到国内外学者广泛关注。其相关研究包括同伴互评本质、外语写作教学中的实际应用效果、与教师评价的对比等内容。其最新研究成果意义深远,为在英语写作教学中深入开展同伴互评提供了理论指导。因此,梳理相关文献就显得尤为迫切和重要。 相似文献
9.
Peer review of teaching is a collegial process designed to help academics reflect on and improve their teaching practice. Considerable research supports the value of peer review of teaching. However, uptake of voluntary programs is typically low. Few studies have examined the predictors of engagement in voluntary peer review. This study surveyed 221 (106 female, 115 male) academics in the first year of implementation of a peer review of a teaching program at a large dual-sector university. Results supported the impact of four key variables on willingness to engage in peer review of teaching: the perceived benefits of the program, an individual's perceived need for support around teaching, perceived drawbacks of the program and career-related benefits. Level of teaching experience was related to willingness to engage: staff with moderate levels of teaching experience were most willing to participate in the program. Limitations of the study are noted and recommendations for peer-review programs are provided. 相似文献
10.
11.
同伴互评能够促进学习者高阶认知能力的发展。文章采用认知网络分析法,以课程进程中四次作业的同伴互评评语为分析对象,从时间序列视角探索同伴互评对学习者知识建构的过程影响与差异影响,剖析出在高校课程教育中"以评促学"的作用机理。研究发现:同伴互评能有效提高学习者深层次的知识建构,帮助学习者在更高阶认知结构上进行知识构建;在同伴互评策略支持下,高、低元认知自我调节能力水平学习者与整体学习者的知识建构过程趋同,即都经历了从浅层学习到深度学习的发展过程;但是,对于高水平元认知自我调节能力组学习者而言,同伴互评在提升学习者认知结构的综合性和深层次的建构方面,有更加明显的作用。 相似文献
12.
同伴互改的优化设计研究 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
文章通过分析同伴互改中出现的主要问题,提出了“调查、培训、评价”六字方针并据此提出了一个同伴互改的优化设计方案。具体做法是将同伴互改与教师批改相结合,在分组前认真调查学生的个性特征,在调查基础上精心分组,对学生进行耐心细致的培训和辅导,并通过激励和评价手段将同伴互改与写作课程整合起来。 相似文献
13.
徐冬东 《齐齐哈尔师范高等专科学校学报》2010,(4):112-115
本研究的目的是探讨同伴互评作文对中国非英语专业本科生写作能力的影响。为了达到研究目的,进行了一项准实验研究。实验组在写作中采用同伴互评作文的方法,控制组采用自评作文的方法。本实验发现：除了两组学生都不能对作文的宏观方面进行有效的修改外,同伴互评作文在其它方面显著优于自评作文。 相似文献
14.
J. W. Gaynor 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2020,45(5):758-775
AbstractPeer review in the classroom can enhance numerous employability skills such as critical appraisal, writing skills, reflection practices and collaborative experiences. This study takes place over two years and discusses the implementation of a repeating blind peer review cycle across a single semester for final year chemistry students enrolled on a compulsory employability module. The feedback cycle promotes personal reflection through the use of mini-reflective questionnaires. The process was assessed by academic tutors at the resubmission stage and/or the peer feedback stage where the quality of peer feedback was directly assessed. The research investigates the quality of peer feedback, the importance of assessment and student perceptions of what is most useful. Methods include directed content analysis of feedback produced, student opinions and a focus group. Students were capable of offering useable feedback across a range of assessment criteria but tend to focus on the important criteria best aligned to the particular assignment. A range of motivational factors and tactics were noticed but students tended to find reviewing the most beneficial. 相似文献
15.
Jennifer Wilson 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2016,41(8):1223-1236
Despite its imperfections, academic peer review has been accepted as a satisfactory process by which assessment panels comprised of different disciplinary representatives arrive at agreement through a system of shared rules and language that respects disciplinary plurality. Artistic researchers, whose output is required to meet both scholarly research criteria and the aesthetic standards expected by their peers in the art world, express concern that university peer review processes disadvantage their disciplines due to differences between artistic research and more science-informed research expectations. As research created with the artistic ‘white cube’ in mind intersects with this ‘black box’ of scholarly peer review, do the shared protocols adopted by peer-review panels extend to research expressed not in scholarly text but in artistic artefact? Are there features inherent in artistic research that impinge upon equitable consideration within these settings? This paper draws upon face-to-face interviews with visual and performing artists in three Australian universities to explore how these researchers experience university peer review. It contributes a distinctive disciplinary perspective to understanding university assessment and evaluation processes for the benefit of both academic staff and postgraduate students. 相似文献
16.
This paper describes the teaching of psychological report writing at Karolinska Institutet and the efforts to improve it through the introduction of formative assessment applied as peer and teacher review. 48 fourth-year psychology students were required to write a psychological report. Half of the students also participated in a non-mandatory peer review of a first draft. All students handed in a preliminary version of the report, had it reviewed by the teachers and made alterations before handing in a final version. The results showed that both peer review and teacher review were valuable methods in the teaching of psychological report writing. 相似文献
17.
蔡朝霞 《湖北广播电视大学学报》2013,33(1):128-129
英语写作是英语学习者必须掌握的基本技能之一,但我国大学生英语写作始终是一个最薄弱的环节。在众多原因中,作文批改对大学生的英语写作水平和能力的提高所产生的影响是不容忽视的。实践证明,在大学英语写作教学中展开同伴互评作文辅助大学英语写作教学的效果优于传统写作教学。本文分析了大学英语写作教学中作文评改的现状,进而分析了实施同伴互评作文的优势及其注意事项。 相似文献
18.
The Room Is Long and Narrow 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
In this paper we analyse some of our experiences with peer review and argue that the process should be rethought. Rather than a gate-keeping device, the ideological function should be acknowledged as well as acknowledging that the true (idealistic) purpose of publishing is to air and develop new ideas – in effect to evolve the community. Given this, peer review as a process would be better thought of as helping authors to develop their ideas and to share them. Such a process involves attempting to understand what an author is trying to do and helping her achieve her goal. It is critically constructive and creative rather than destructive/deconstructive. In recognising this we articulate the true purpose of the peer review process and of participating in it – or at least the democratic purpose for which it was conceived. This involves enabling divergent opinions to be heard and this in turn enables the evolution of the field from within, for the danger is if evolution does not come from within it is imposed from without. 相似文献
19.
E. Jackson Baur 《College Teaching》2013,61(3):104-108
Abstract The use of peers in the evaluation of teaching is part of a larger trend in postsecondary education toward a more systematic assessment of classroom performance. Many scholars believe that certain aspects of teaching can be assessed only by classroom observation. This study examines the use that peer reviewers make of teaching products, especially peer observation reports, during the promotion and tenure review process. Results indicate that peer observation reports are seen as an important component in evaluating teaching effectiveness, though perhaps not the best indicator of effective teaching. Despite flaws in peer observation instruments, the results from classroom observation are seen as valid and are used in deliberations about faculty teaching performance. 相似文献
20.
Vinícius Medina Kern Luciana Martins Saraiva Roberto Carlos dos Santos Pacheco 《Education and Information Technologies》2003,8(1):37-46
This article discusses the application of the peer review process as a pedagogical instrument for the promotion of written expression, collaborative work, critical thinking, and professional responsibility among Informatics and Engineering majors. The approach is introduced with a motivation, followed by a discussion about common principles of current learning paradigms and the peer review process. This work is being conducted in Brazil, where we intend to promote a learning paradigm shift through the application of peer review in education. A framework for this application is outlined, together with an account of results from experiences and a discussion about the skills that this approach exercises, especially with regard to widely accepted curricula and codes of ethics and professional conduct. Further research and development efforts are conjectured. 相似文献