共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 62 毫秒
1.
分析图书馆学情报学期刊广告媒体的五大优势:独特价值的信息源、艺术价值高、时效性长、具有可信度、多方面的经济效益,提出 我国图书馆学情报学期刊开展广告经营的有效策略:取得期刊广告经营许可证、办好刊物吸引广告、围绕其学术内容开展专题广告创意、提高广 告设计制作水平、成立广告经营部、多途径拓展广告业务、以优质服务树立刊物声誉等。 相似文献
2.
国外图书情报类期刊热点主题及发展趋势研究 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
利用自组织映射(SOM)人工神经网络方法分析60种有代表性的国外图书情报类期刊的热点主题及Journal of Information Science(JIS)从1981-2007年的主题发展趋势。利用改进的SOM输出方式——属性叠加矩阵,识别出60种期刊的7类热点主题,并构造一种新的SOM显示方式“热点属性投影”, 结合常见的U-matrix图,分析JIS期刊的热点主题在过去27年间的发展过程与规律。其研究结果在一定程度上可以反映国外图书情报类期刊主题的发展规律。该研究方法为期刊热点主题识别及发展趋势研究提供较为完整的工具与思路。 相似文献
3.
促进我国图书情报学期刊开放存取的建议 总被引：2，自引：1，他引：1
针对我国图书情报学期刊开放存取现状,从争取政府支持、选择合适模式、扩大OA期刊范围、提高OA期刊影响力、注重整理、宣传及利用、与开放存取仓储结合以及中国图书馆学会等机构的努力方面提出了促进该学科期刊开放存取的建议。 相似文献
4.
[目的/意义]探讨作者贡献声明的格式、内容构成要素及与作者署名次序之间的关系等,旨在发现规律以便更加科学、合理地对论文合作作者进行学术评价及加快图情学期刊作者贡献声明的规范和推广进程。[方法/过程]阐述3种国内外图情学期刊作者贡献声明的格式及内容构成要素,分析和比较不同署名次序的作者与不同类型贡献要素之间的关系。[结果/结论]3种期刊作者贡献声明的格式、要素等有待进一步规范和推广;3种期刊无论从作者层面还是从贡献要素角度分析,都呈现署名靠前的作者其贡献要素参与程度较高的规律,并且第一作者在"提出研究思路"撰写论文"设计研究方案"等核心贡献要素上表现突出。 相似文献
5.
Zahiruddin Khurshid 《期刊图书馆员》2013,64(1):81-98
This research study evaluates the quality of articles published by Saudi and expatriate authors in foreign Library and Information Science (LIS) journals using three popular metrics for ranking journals—Journal Impact Factor (JIF), SCImago Journal Rank (SJR), and Google Scholar Metrics (GSM). The reason for using multiple metrics is to see how closely or differently journals are ranked by the three different methods of citation analysis. However, the 2012 JIF list of journals is too small, almost half the size of the SJR and GSM lists, which inhibited one-to-one comparison among the impact factors of the thirty-six journals selected by Saudi authors for publishing articles. Only seventeen journals were found common to all the three lists, limiting the usefulness of the data. A basic problem is that Saudi LIS authors generally lack the level of competency in the English language required to achieve publication in the most prominent LIS journals. The study will have implications for authors, directors, and deans of all types of academic libraries; chairmen and deans of library schools; and the Saudi Library Association. Hopefully these entities will take necessary steps to prepare and motivate both academics and practicing librarians to improve the quality of their research and publications and thus get published in higher ranked journals. 相似文献
6.
图书情报学期刊及公共图书馆区域分布之比较 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
通过对东西部地区图书馆学情报学专业期刊、图书馆学情报学专业核心期刊、论文发表数量、各地区投入图书情报事业经费状况的比较分析,找出我国东西部地区在图书馆学情报学研究及公共图书馆建设之间的差距,并分析其原因及根源。 相似文献
7.
图书馆学情报学中的电子政务研究 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
为探索电子政务研究与图书馆学情报学的关系,调查我国图书馆学情报学专业硕士与博士培养单位电子政务相关研究方向的设置情况,并对我国图书馆学情报学核心期刊中电子政务的相关论文进行文献计量分析。主要分析论文的作者和机构、基金资助、研究热点与主题分布情况,发现电子政务是图书馆学情报学的重要研究领域。目前,作为交叉学科领域的电子政务研究主题正呈现出学科分化的趋势;今后,图书馆学情报学专业的电子政务研究应当更加聚焦于本专业的核心研究课题。 相似文献
8.
[目的/意义]随着信息技术的高速发展,学科之间的交叉融合趋势越来越明显,探索学科间知识交流活动,明确学科结构,对其学科发展具有重要意义。以图书情报学科为例,观察其知识的流入与输出情况,包括知识从哪个学科哪些方面流入以及输出到哪些学科哪些方面。[方法/过程]选择图书情报领域12种核心期刊作为数据来源,以CNKI的学科分类为标准进行学科划分,使用可视化软件工具Gephi,从参考和引证两个角度探讨图书情报学科与其他学科间的交叉融合情况。[结果/结论]图书情报学科与计算机科学、基础科学综合、经济管理等学科联系紧密,学科结构趋于稳定;图书情报学科的参考总量远远小于被引总量;自引率呈逐年下降趋势,和外部学科交流频繁。 相似文献
9.
学术期刊参考文献规范化问题探讨——以图书情报专业核心期刊为例 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
以图书馆学情报学核心期刊为例,对2008年下半年出版的17种期刊执行GB/T7714-2005<文后参考文献著录规则>的情况进行抽样调查.结果发现,在文内标注、文后著录格式和电子文献著录方面存在大量不规范现象,对失误原因分析之后,提出应充分发挥编辑的把关作用、责任意识、教育作用和提高作者写作基本功两方面来加强编辑与作者的规范意识. 相似文献
10.
我国图情期刊学术规范化调查——以文后参考文献著录为例 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
以图书馆学情报学核心期刊为例,对2007年上半年出版的17种期刊执行GB/T7714-2005 《文后参考文献著录规则》的情况进行抽样调查。结果发现,17种图情期刊中对文后参考文献著录格式提出明确要求的很少,而且在著录项目、著录格式和著录符号使用3个方面还存在大量的不规范现象,因此提出应该从认清编辑的角色、关注国家标准和提供作者写作指南等来加强编辑与作者的规范意识。 相似文献
11.
Diana B. Cohen 《International Information and Library Review》2013,45(3):231-262
AbstractUsing a scientometric approach, this study examines scholarly publications by library and information science (LIS) researchers affiliated with Iranian institutions that were published in non-Iranian journals and indexed in the Web of Science (WoS) database, together with publications in Iranian LIS journals from 1980 through 2016. The results show that Iranian authors published 538 LIS documents indexed in WoS and another 7,837 in national journals. The research article was the predominant document type at both the national and international levels. The total number of international publications in LIS by all countries was 313,449; Iran ranked 34th among the countries for publications in LIS. 相似文献
12.
Yu-Wei Chang 《Library & information science research》2018,40(2):125-134
This bibliometric analysis explores the interdisciplinary characteristics of library and information science (LIS) from the perspective of interdisciplinary LIS authors. Articles published in non-LIS journals by LIS authors between 2005 and 2014 and indexed by the Web of Science database formed the basis for analysis. The results showed that interdisciplinary LIS authors published articles in numerous disciplines; a largest number of articles were found in medical and music journals. Over half of the articles published by these authors were not LIS-related and were primarily singly-authored articles and articles coauthored by LIS and non-LIS authors. Most articles coauthored by only LIS authors involved LIS-related topics. Interdisciplinary LIS authors preferred to publish by themselves. The majority of interdisciplinary authors were academic librarians. Interdisciplinary LIS authors most frequently collaborated with other LIS authors, followed by authors from the field of medicine. Although interdisciplinary LIS authors are a minority, they are active in expanding the visibility of LIS. 相似文献
13.
《Library & information science research》2014,36(3-4):163-170
The preferences of the authors of Chinese library and information science (LIS) journal articles in citing Internet sources were investigated using eight premium Chinese LIS journals from Chinese Social Sciences Citation Index (the observation group) and 10 journals in other disciplines (the control group) from the same database from 1999 to 2008. A total of 252,881 citations were analyzed in terms of count, domain name, and citing purposes. The results show that (a) in comparison to the disciplines in the control group, LIS articles in Chinese journals indicated a strong preference for citing Internet sources, and this preference is increasing; (b) LIS articles did not seem to discriminate against domain names when citing Internet sources; and (c) LIS articles cited more Internet sources as evidence to support research results and conclusions. Excessive dependency on Internet sources may raise concerns over the quality, research ethics, and credibility of research publications. Chinese LIS researchers should place more emphasis on the disadvantages of Internet sources as supporting material. Guidelines and criteria to help researchers, journal editors, students, and librarians assess information on the Web need to be developed. 相似文献
14.
Ángel Borrego Jordi Ardanuy Cristóbal Urbano 《The Journal of Academic Librarianship》2018,44(5):663-670
Academic libraries are increasingly called upon to demonstrate their value to their home institutions. Research collaboration with faculty resulting in the co-authorship of scholarly output is one possible way to demonstrate the alignment of the library with the institutional mission. Involvement in research also improves librarians' skills in offering research support services. This study explores the contribution of librarians to scholarly journals in fields other than Library and Information Science (LIS) as well as their collaboration practices with researchers in those fields. Results show an increasing number of papers published by library-affiliated authors in non-LIS journals between 2006 and 2015. The papers fall broadly into four areas: articles on topics related to LIS published in non-LIS journals; higher education and information literacy; systematic reviews and meta-analysis; and research collaboration in the faculty's areas of expertise. The study is limited by the difficulty in properly retrieving the scholarly output of librarians from bibliographic databases and the difficulty in ascertaining their contributions to published articles. 相似文献
15.
[目的/意义] 随着社交媒体和电子出版平台的兴起,利用期刊在Twitter上的关注度来评价期刊能够对传统的期刊评价方式进行补充,发现该指标与传统指标之间的相关性关系,并以期最终构建合理的期刊社交网络影响力评价指标。[方法/过程] 根据《期刊引用报告》(Journal Citation Reports,JCR)的社会科学版,选取国际图书情报学领域影响因子前30位的期刊作为该领域的国际顶级期刊。为了研究altmetrics指标与传统的基于引文的评价指标间的相关关系,利用Spearman非参数相关性分析对期刊Twitter提及频次与8个传统指标(总被引数、影响因子、5年期影响因子、即年指标、论文数、引文半衰期、特征因子和论文影响分值)之间的相关性进行分析。[结果/结论] 统计结果显示,JASIST、College & Research Libraries和Scientometrics是本领域中在Twitter上受关注度最高的期刊。期刊Twitter提及频次仅与期刊特征因子间存在中等的显著相关性,与其他指标间存在较弱的相关性。值得注意的是,相比其他期刊,在Twitter上设有官方账号的期刊明显得到更高的关注度。 相似文献
16.
分析SSCI图书馆学情报学期刊补充材料存缴政策,以2012年72种LIS期刊作者投稿须知以及在线文章为样本,从期刊数量、文章数量、补充材料类型、功能、格式5个角度进行详细论述。研究发现大型出版商更倾向于制定相关的补充材料政策,有的期刊尽管没有补充材料存缴政策,但也接受相关的补充材料。本研究结果可以为期刊或出版商制定更为细分的、学科性的补充材料政策提供建议。 相似文献
17.
当前的期刊评价研究主要集中在影响力、声誉、质量等方面,针对期刊内容差异性的定量研究相对较少。本文从差异性视角来对期刊进行评价分析,提出期刊区分度指标来对期刊内容的差异程度进行度量。以LIS (library and information science)等5个学科的各20种核心期刊为研究对象,首先对LIS期刊的内容差异性进行定量分析与评价,然后从时间维度对LIS学科期刊区分度的变化规律进行了探测,最后从学科维度对不同学科期刊个体和总体区分度的特征进行了分析和探讨。实验结果表明,利用该指标能够很好地度量期刊研究内容差异性,期刊区分度在时间维度上呈现出明显的变化规律,不同学科期刊个体和总体的区分度均具有显著的学科特征。 相似文献
18.
开放存取期刊质量评价指标研究 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
19.
The purpose of this article is to explore the use of mixed methods research (MMR) in articles published in library and information science (LIS) journals in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) from 2004 to 2008. A mixed methods research framework provided in the methodological literature is used to determine how this method was practiced within the LIS scientific community in SSA. Six hundred and eighty five articles published in nine peer-reviewed LIS journals in SAA were reviewed, finding the dominant research methods in these journals to be survey designs and historical research. The use of MMR was limited: 48 out of 685 articles used the mixed methods approaches that were identified in the methodological literature. A paradigm shift and a change of mindset are recommended for LIS researchers in SSA so that they may exploit the advantages offered by mixed methods research in conducting their studies. 相似文献
20.
《期刊图书馆员》2012,62(1-2):38-48
ABSTRACTThis article presents a thorough bibliometric analysis of research published in Annals of Library and Information Studies (ALIS), an India-based journal, for the period 2011–2017. Specifically, it compares this journal’s trends with those of other library and information science (LIS) journals from the same geographical area (India, and Asia as a whole) and with the 10 highest-rated LIS journals worldwide. The source of the data used was the multidisciplinary database Scopus. To perform this comparison, ALIS’ production was analyzed in order to identify authorship patterns; for example, authors’ countries of residence, co-authorship trends, and collaboration networks. Research topics were identified through keyword analysis, while performance was measured by examining the number of citations articles received. This study provides substantial information. The research lines detected through examining the keywords in ALIS articles were determined to be similar to those for the top LIS journals in both Asia and worldwide. Specifically, ALIS authors are focusing on metrics, bibliometrics, and social networking, which follows global trends. Notably, however, collaboration among Asia-based journals was found to be lower than that in the top-indexed journals in the LIS field, showing lesser internationalization. The results obtained present a roadmap for expanding the research in this field. 相似文献