共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 812 毫秒
1.
英语教学中的形成性评价与终结性评价 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
陈绍红 《宿州教育学院学报》2006,9(2):84-86
本文介绍了形成性评价、终结性评价以及它们的重要性,尤其是形成性评价在我国英语教学领域的应用价值。因为中国的英语教学评价体系可能存在一定的缺陷,它们在某种程度上阻碍了学生的全面发展。关于如何恰当实施形成性评价和终结性评价,本文提出了一些建议。 相似文献
2.
提出新的问题,从新的角度去看旧的问题,需要有创造性思维.如何培养学生提出问题的能力呢?本文谈谈笔者的做法.一、巧借质疑,鼓励学生设计问题在教学过程中,我们经常会遇到学生由于对某些物理概念、规律或习题的理解不够深刻,甚至错误,往往会提出一些幼稚或有失科学性的问题.这时,教师应在指出学生存在的问题的同时耐心引导,鼓励他们进一步设计出新问题. 相似文献
3.
本文论述了形成性评价对英语口语教学的具有的积极作用,阐述如何将形成性评价与英语口语教学的目的、思想、方式结合起来,进一步提出了英语口语教学形成性评价的原则和方法,并强调了形成性评价与英语口语教学相结合的好处。 相似文献
4.
形成性评价在英语教学中的尝试 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
本文分析了现行教学评价方式的弊端，阐述了形成性评价的优势和形成性评价在教学中的常用方法，探索了如何把这些方法运用于英语教学的一些具体策略。列举了形成性评价在课堂教学中的一些实际操作。说明形成性评价运用于英语教学是行之有效的方法。 相似文献
5.
《佳木斯教育学院学报》2016,(7)
《义务教育英语课程标准》中,明确指出:评价是英语课程的重要组成部分。现阶段,形成性评价是在教学评价中积极倡导的。但由于诸多因素,形成性评价在实施过程中存在诸多问题,如何才能有效开展形成性评价成为重中之重。本文将从教师、学生及学校的角度对此问题进行初步探究,希望对读者有所启发。 相似文献
6.
7.
提问是教学活动过程中师幼互动的重要形式,是联系师生思维活动的纽带,其目的是启发幼儿思维,将教学活动逐步引向深入,让幼儿运用已有的知识经验去探索新问题、解决新问题,也是教师检查教育教学的有效手段。而数学具有高度的抽象性和严密的逻辑性,问题如何设计、提出问题以后怎样根据幼儿思维特点给予合理的反馈,从而引导他们积极思考,这是我们广大幼儿教师需思考和解决的要点所在。文章就数学活动中教师如何提出问题给出了一些建议,并对如何有效组织提出了相应的策略。 相似文献
8.
9.
顾慧萍 《华夏少年(简快作文 )》2005,(5)
教育部颁发《全日制义务教育普通高级中学英语课程标准》提出的形成性评价思想,对我国基础英语教学将产生十分重大的影响。但从学习、掌握并得到理解、支持最后能贯彻到教学实践之中还需要一个努力过程,本文对形成性评价思想谈谈理解和认识。 相似文献
10.
金娣 《佳木斯教育学院学报》2012,(12):177-177
自20世纪80年代中期以来,由布鲁姆提出的形成性评价的相关理论引起我国教育界的广泛关注,广大教师纷纷在教学中运用形成性评价方法,并在一定程度上改善了教学成果,但是教师在使用形成性评价时仍然存在一些的误区。课堂提问是教师检测学生掌握知识的常用手段,但提问本身并不能达到形成性的目的。本文就教师如何更好地发挥课堂提问中形成性评价的功能进行探讨。 相似文献
11.
The purpose of this pragmatic action research study was to explore our re‐conceptualization efforts in preparing pre‐service teachers to guide the inquiry process with formative assessment and subsequently use the understandings to improve our teacher preparation program. The process was guided by two questions: to what extent did course re‐conceptualization efforts lead to a more informed understanding of formative assessment by pre‐service teachers and did strategies enacted in the re‐conceptualized methods course foster or hinder pre‐service teachers' understanding of formative assessment? Data from this study support the following findings: (1) a substantial pre‐ to post‐methods course difference was realized in the pre‐service teachers' understanding of formative assessment; (2) explicit and contextualized approaches to formative assessment in the methods course led to increased understandings by pre‐service teachers; (3) an implicit approach led to improvements in course structure but did not foster pre‐service teachers' understanding of the reflexive nature of formative assessment; and (4) a field‐based case study on elementary science teaching both hindered and fostered our efforts with formative assessment. This study yields implications for pre‐service teacher education on formative assessment. To foster pre‐service teachers' knowledge and skills, we suggest explicit instruction on formative assessment combined with case studies, field experiences, and ongoing reflection. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 47: 402–421, 2010 相似文献
12.
Lorrie A. Shepard 《Educational Measurement》2009,28(3):32-37
In many school districts, the pressure to raise test scores has created overnight celebrity status for formative assessment. Its powers to raise student achievement have been touted, however, without attending to the research on which these claims were based. Sociocultural learning theory provides theoretical grounding for understanding how formative assessment works to increase student learning. The articles in this special issue bring us back to underlying first principles by offering separate validity frameworks for evaluating formative assessment (Nichols, Meyers, & Burling) and newly-invented interim assessments (Perie, Marion, & Gong). The article by Heritage, Kim, Vendlinski, and Herman then offers the most important insight of all; that is, formative assessment is of little use if teachers don't know what to do when students are unable to grasp an important concept. While it is true that validity investigations are needed, I argue that the validity research that will tell us the most—about how formative assessment can be used to improve student learning—must be embedded in rich curriculum and must at the same time attempt to foster instructional practices consistent with learning research. 相似文献
13.
14.
Jenifer Davies 《Curriculum Journal》2013,24(2):71-86
In contrast to theoretical and empirical insights from research into formative assessment in compulsory schooling, understanding the relationship between formative assessment, motivation and learning in vocational education has been a topic neglected by researchers. The Improving Formative Assessment project (IFA) addresses this gap, using a sociocultural approach to explore the relationship between formative assessment practices and ‘learning cultures’ in vocational education. This article explores the influence of learning cultures in vocational education on the practice of formative assessment and evaluates critically two closely related questions. Why do some learning cultures foster formative assessment that leads to instrumental learning while others develop deeper forms of learning? When is formative assessment a springboard for sustainable learning, and when does it remain an instrumental straitjacket? 相似文献
15.
Tony Burner 《Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research》2016,60(6):626-648
Recognizing the importance of formative assessment, this mixed-methods study investigates how four teachers and 100 students respond to the new emphasis on formative assessment in English as a foreign language (EFL) writing classes in Norway. While previous studies have examined formative assessment in oral classroom interactions and focused on either studying students or teachers, little research has been conducted on formative assessment of writing where both students and teachers are studied. As such, this study provides new insight. The findings mostly indicate that contradictions are prevalent amongst teachers’ and students’ perceptions of formative assessment of writing. The contradictions revolve around feedback, grades, text revision, self-assessment, and student involvement. The identified contradictions suggest the need for developing a mutual understanding of formative assessment in order to make it useful and meaningful. 相似文献
16.
Based on the results of a generalizability study of measures of teacher knowledge for teaching mathematics developed at the National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing at the University of California, Los Angeles, this article provides evidence that teachers are better at drawing reasonable inferences about student levels of understanding from assessment information than they are at deciding the next instructional steps. We discuss the implications of the results for effective formative assessment and end with considerations of how teachers can be supported to know what to teach next. 相似文献
17.
Marian Sainsbury Tom Benton 《British journal of educational technology : journal of the Council for Educational Technology》2011,42(3):500-514
Computer‐based testing, or e‐assessment, has the potential to deliver immediate results for the benefit of schools. This paper describes a project that aimed to exploit this potential by designing e‐assessments where the results were intended for use by teachers in planning the next steps in teaching and learning: low‐stakes, formative assessment. A pair of tests assessing early reading was developed, with the test items based on a range of distinct skills, including phonological segmentation, rhyming and word recognition. The tests were administered on a screen with the questions presented aurally and visually. In trials, a total of 1345 test results were obtained from pupils aged 5–7 years from 26 schools. Latent class analysis was used to identify patterns of performance within the data. Four latent classes were distinguished, each characterised by a pattern of responses related to the different test items. The strengths and weaknesses in early reading skills implied by each of these latent classes were described in terms of formative ‘profiles’ provided for teachers in an online reporting package together with indicators for the next steps in teaching. The research resulted in an automated marking and analysis system that can be genuinely formative. 相似文献
18.
Qiuxian Chen Margaret Kettle Lyn May 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2013,38(7):831-846
Formative assessment is increasingly being implemented through policy initiatives in Chinese educational contexts. As an approach to assessment, formative assessment derives many of its key principles from Western contexts, notably through the work of scholars in the UK, the USA and Australia. The question for this paper is the ways that formative assessment has been interpreted in the teaching of College English in Chinese Higher Education. The paper reports on a research study that utilised a sociocultural perspective on learning and assessment to analyse how two Chinese universities – an urban-based Key University and a regional-based Non-Key University – interpreted and enacted a China Ministry of Education policy on formative assessment in College English teaching. Of particular interest for the research were the ways in which the sociocultural conditions of the Chinese context mediated understanding of Western principles and led to their adaptation. The findings from the two universities identified some consistency in localised interpretations of formative assessment which included emphases on process and student participation. The differences related to the specific sociocultural conditions contextualising each university including geographical location, socioeconomic status, and teacher and student roles, expectations and beliefs about English. The findings illustrate the sociocultural tensions in interpreting, adapting and enacting formative assessment in Chinese College English classes and the consequent challenges to and questions about retaining the spirit of formative assessment as it was originally conceptualised. 相似文献
19.
Jacqueline P. Leighton 《Journal of Educational Measurement》2019,56(4):793-814
If K‐12 students are to be fully integrated as active participants in their own learning, understanding how they interpret formative assessment feedback is needed. The objective of this article is to advance three claims about why teachers and assessment scholars/specialists may have little understanding of students’ interpretation of formative assessment feedback. The three claims are as follows. First, there is little systematic research of K‐12 students’ interpretations of feedback. Systematic research requires gathering substantive evidence of students’ cognitive and emotional processes using psychological methods and tools. Second, there is an overemphasis on the external assessment process at the expense of uncovering learners’ internal reasoning and emotional processes. This overemphasis may be due to vestiges of behavioral approaches and lack of training in social cognitive methods. Third, there are psychological tools such as the clinical interview, pioneered by Piaget and used by psychologists to “enter the child's mind,” which may be helpful in uncovering students’ interpretation of feedback and associated behavioral responses. If the purpose of formative assessment is to change student learning, and feedback is delivered as a conduit to help with this long‐term change, understanding students’ interpretation of feedback plays a central role in the validity of the process. 相似文献
20.
苗雪红 《临沂师范学院学报》2007,29(5):81-83
教师从事教育研究是教师专业成长的一种方式。在对学科教育各专业开设《教育科学研究方法》课程的过程中,通过反思性实践的方式不断生成并重组教学内容,运用讲授课、实践课、指导课、讨论课、经验交流等多种教学方式,采取形成性评价和学生档案回顾的自我评价方式,进行了一系列教学改革。结果表明,学生通过从事教育研究实践,加深了对教育理论及实践的理解,提升了对教育实践活动的理论关照能力,初步实现了专业思想启蒙的专业化目的。 相似文献