共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 562 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
随着我国社会主义市场经济的建立和完善,多种所有制经济共同发展,档案所有权的存在形式也相应地发生变化,而且非国有档案越来越多,档案所有权纠纷案件随之出现并有增多趋势. 相似文献
4.
5.
6.
7.
社区作为城市建设和管理的基层组织，是我国城市改革和社会发展到一定阶段的必然产物，也是我国城市现代化建设进程中的一个重要标志。社区档案工作是社区工作的重要组成部分，是维护社区历史面貌的一项重要的基础性工作。随着改革开放和市场经济不断深入发展，社区档案工作作为社区建设的一项全新社会服务事业得到了一定的发展，同时， 相似文献
8.
民营企业档案工作存在的问题及对策 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
党的十五大以来,随着经济结构特别是所有制结构的大力调整,我国民营经济出现了迅猛发展的良好势头。非公有制经济是我国社会主义市场经济的重要组成部分,民营企业档案工作是国家档案事业的组成部分。民营企业档案真实地记录了民营企业诞生、发展的历史过程,记录了民营企业在国民经济和社会发展中所发挥的重要作用,这些档案资料对于民营企业和社会的发展具有重要意义。把民营企业形成的具有保存价值和应当保存的档案完整安全地保留下来,是民营企业应依法履行的义务,也是档案部门义不容辞的责任。与民营企业迅猛崛起相比,民营企业档案工作的发… 相似文献
9.
随着改革开放和市场经济的发展，档案作为一种无形资产的载体，其所有制多元化的特点将越来越明显，档案工作中的各种关系半变得越来越复杂。随着信息技术的推进，电子件大量出现，又为档案管理工作提出了新的课题。[第一段] 相似文献
10.
市场经济的建立和发展，既为企业档案工作的发展带来了机遇，也引出了档案管理工作的一系列新“难点”，给企业档案管理提出了新的研究课题，在市场经济条件下，如何使档案管理工作适应企业发展的需要，是摆在档案工作者面前的艰巨任务。一、市场经济条件下企业档案工作面临的“难点”1、市场经济的求利性与企业档案工作效益的滞后性，使档案工作在企业各项工作中排不上重要日程。市场经济要求企业必须以经济效益为中心，要以最少的投入，得到最大、最快的产出。对企业直接创造经济效益的部门给予极大的重视和支持，而档案部门不能直接创造… 相似文献
11.
在调查比较中英文献中日益增多的档案多元现象的基础上,归纳了国外档案多元论代表性作者的代表性学术观点,探究了档案多元论与档案中立说及文件连续体管理模式和文件管理信息学的关系,讨论了档案多元论对档案教育与研究的影响以及对档案实践应用的启示。 相似文献
12.
Theo Thomassen 《Archival Science》1987,1(4):373-385
This first introduction, written for educational purposes, is meant to be a concise basic text in which the core concepts of archival science are coherently defined and explained, in a non-polemical way and departing from a de-institutionalised point of view. It is not intended to support or reject any single theory, but to provide an overview. It should be read as a synthesis of a variety of shared ideas and views, not as a manifesto of a new approach to archival science. If there is anything new to it, it might be located in the coherent and integrated presentation. In this primer of archival science annotation has been avoided.This revised version was published online in October 2005 with corrections to the Cover Date. 相似文献
13.
A first introduction to archival science 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
Theo Thomassen 《Archival Science》2001,1(4):373-385
This first introduction, written for educational purposes, is meant to be a concise basic text in which the core concepts
of archival science are coherently defined and explained, in a non-polemical way and departing from a de-institutionalised
point of view. It is not intended to support or reject any single theory, but to provide an overview. It should be read as
a synthesis of a variety of shared ideas and views, not as a manifesto of a new approach to archival science. If there is
anything new to it, it might be located in the coherent and integrated presentation. In this primer of archival science annotation
has been avoided.
The first of several versions of this First Introduction was written in August 1995. It was meant to meet the need of the
Netherlands Archiefschool for a basic text on archival science which could support its different programs for archival education
and training. After ample discussion with the archival science teachers of the Archiefschool, it was introduced in the 1995/1996
courses. From then on, it has been used in almost all courses and classes on archival science on the undergraduate, graduate
and postgraduate levels and in several training and retraining programs of the Archiefschool. The design of the first version
has been maintained in all subsequent versions, including this last one. Still, the text has frequently been adapted as a
result of discussions with students and colleagues, in and outside the school. This first English version can almost be deemed
as a collective product. Of the numerous colleagues who were engaged in this discussion and contributed to the text, special
mention has to be made of Peter Horsman, Hans Scheurkogel, Hans Hofman, Eric Ketelaar, Herman Coppens and Kent Hayworth, who
commented the English version. For the final text and all imperfections that may still cling to it I am, of course, responsible.
An earlier version in Dutch has been published as: Theo thomassen, “Een korte introductie in de archivistiek”, in: P.J. Horsman,
F.C.J. Ketelaar en T.H.P.M. Thomassen (red.),Naar een nieuw paradigma in de archivistiek ('s-Gravenhage, 1999), pp. 11–20. 相似文献
14.
Catherine Bailey 《Archival Science》2005,5(2-4):361-364
The author, who is Guest Reviews Editor for this special issue on macro-appraisal, introduces and provides context for four
review articles, written by archival educators from Canada, the United States, and Australia, that discuss the most important
works they use to teach macroappraisal and why these works are chosen. While each article demonstrates the unique characteristics
of the archival education program in which the author is situated, they are united by a common theme—the need for educators
to prepare students, as best they can, to take their places as practising professional archivists. 相似文献
15.
16.
Terry Cook 《Archives and Museum Informatics》1997,11(1):15-37
This essay is a preliminary assessment of David Bearman as the leading archival thinker of the late twentieth century. Bearman has revolutionized thinking in archival circles around the world by offering a defence of traditional archival notions of provenance, evidence, recordness, and contextuality that equals the noblest statements of a Hilary Jenkinson, and by positing a relevant, dynamic, engaged future for archivists to transform the Information Age into a Record-Keeping Age. The essay is both a personal reflection and critical analysis. There are three main themes: an assessment of Bearman's ideas and their overall importance to general archival theory; a more specific exposition of the nature and importance of the University of Pittsburgh Project and of where Bearman sees that its results are leading archivists and their profession and institutions in future; and a critique of some of the implications, if not the conscious intentions, of his ideas and methods that seem to exclude the cultural, historical, and heritage dimensions and uses of archives, public or private. The overall aim of the essay is to push the archival discourse to the next stage by challenging and constructively critiquing as well as extolling the work of this archival pioneer. 相似文献
17.
本文结合文献计量分析法和文献研读法,对2022年《档案学研究》和《档案学通讯》所刊发的207篇学术论文进行研究力量布局与研究主题分布分析,并与2021年分析结果相比较,发现高等院校仍是档案学研究的主体力量,来自业界的研究力量有所增强。2022年中国档案学研究依旧关注“档案学基础理论”“档案治理”“档案与数字人文”“电子文件”“中国古文书学”等主题,但也涌现了“红色档案”和“档案学科建设与发展”等新主题;研究特点上呈现显著的本土化和跨学科性,但在关注“人”的需求、跨学科的双向互动以及研究深度上仍有待加强。未来中国档案学研究仍需立足中国档案工作的实际和需求,对从西方移植的理论进行本土化、中国化的过滤和处理,对中国传统的档案思想进行创新性转化和发展,同时,基于档案工作、档案事业发展的新实践和新需求,提出新的思想和理论。 相似文献
18.
企业贯标并不是什么新鲜的事情了,尤其是我国入世以后国内很多企业纷纷向中国认证中心申请认证,目的是提高本企业产品的质量信誉度,顺利进入国际市场。江西铜业集团公司作为省属特大型国有企业在2002年正式向中国认证中心申报了国际标准化认证,即推行ISO9001标准。公司所属档案 相似文献
19.
中国档案学研究内容广博,外国档案学研究内容精深;中国档案学研究主体以高校档案专业教师为主,外国档案学研究主体以档案实际工作者为主;中国档案学研究方法以定性描述为主,外国档案学研究方法以实证研究为主。中外档案学研究的明显差异性不是偶然出现的,它与中外档案事业管理体制、教育体系和各国研究历史传统、档案职业专业化水平等诸多因素都有关系,在本文中,作者对产生这三个方面差异的原因进行了分析。 相似文献