共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 734 毫秒
1.
开放获取出版模式研究 总被引：24，自引：1，他引：24
开放获取是一种新的学术出版与交流模式，与传统期刊出版在办刊理念、运作模式、编审过程、经费来源、版权问题以及期刊评价等方面均有很大的不同。文章论述了开放获取出版模式的意义和特点，对中国出版界推动和实施开放获取出版提出了政策建议。 相似文献
2.
This paper reports on a study – overseen by representatives of the publishing, library, and research funder communities in the UK – investigating the drivers, costs, and benefits of potential ways to increase access to scholarly journals. It identifies five different but realistic scenarios for moving towards that end over the next five years, including gold and green open access, moves towards national licensing, publisher‐led delayed open access, and transactional models. It then compares and evaluates the benefits as well as the costs and risks for the UK. The scenarios, and the modelling on which they are based, amount to a benefit‐cost analysis to help in appraising policy options. Our conclusion is that policymakers should encourage the use of existing subject and institutional repositories, but avoid pushing for reductions in embargo periods, which might put at risk the sustainability of the underlying scholarly publishing system. They should also promote and facilitate a transition to gold open access, while seeking to ensure that the average level of publication fees does not exceed c.£2.000; that the rate in the UK of open access publication is broadly in step with the rest of the world; and that total payments to publishers from UK universities do not rise as a consequence. 相似文献
3.
美国国会及基金资助机构、一些大学都制定政策支持开放存取出版。麻省理工学院图书馆开展的开放存取出版服务主要有:建立机构知识库、管理开放存取文章出版补助基金、支持多渠道开放存取出版、指导开放存取出版等;其服务人员配置合理,并将Libguides应用到开放存取出版服务。借鉴于此,我国高校图书馆应提高对开放存取出版服务的重视程度,为开放存取出版创造条件,积极倡导开放存取出版学术成果,开展学术研究相关的版权服务以完善服务体系。 相似文献
4.
[目的/意义] 对文献订购经费转化为开放出版资助经费实现学术期刊从订阅获取模式向开放获取模式转化的经济可行性进行分析,以期引起科研管理机构、科研教育机构、图书馆及学者对国际发展趋势和有关行动计划的关注,促进开放获取学术交流环境的发展。[方法/过程] 分析期刊论文全面开放获取所需APC经费与当前期刊订购体系总体投入比较的案例,对国家层面参与学术期刊向开放获取转化国际行动计划所面临情况评估、判断的基础数据需求和有关监控、报告、共享机制及规范的建立提出建议。[结果/结论] 国家有关部门应支持图书馆开展有关基础性分析研究,为文献订购经费向支持开放出版转化的策略和措施的制定提供重要支持和参考。 相似文献
5.
The library's role in the management and funding of open access publishing 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1 
下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 Kate LARA 《Learned Publishing》2015,28(1):4-8
This survey presents information on library management of open access resources, institutional involvement in open access funding, and the role librarians see themselves playing in this model in the future. 149 responses from 30 different countries were included. 94% of respondents were librarians, and the remaining 6% consisted of faculty, students, and other library staff. Results showed that most libraries are cataloging open access journals, though they usually represent only 1–5% of total listings. The responsibility for funding open access is more likely to fall on the author or a granting organization than the library or institution. 23% of libraries in this survey help finance open access, and one‐third of these had established criteria for funding. While librarians disagreed on the appropriate level of their involvement in the publishing process and financing of article charges, the majority viewed the library as an important advocate for open access publishing in their institution. 相似文献
6.
Ross COLEMAN 《Learned Publishing》2009,22(4):297-303
Sydney eScholarship is a framework and suite of services that enables integration of digital collections, open access repositories, and research data services with scholarly publishing. The primary platform for scholarly publishing at the University of Sydney – Sydney University Press – currently operates as part of the University Library's Sydney eScholarship program. Three sets of publishing initiatives demonstrate the integration of the digital library with scholarly publishing to deliver different forms to different audiences: (i) new publishing and the literary canons – rediscovery, customisation and critical interpretations; (ii) book and web – open access publishing; (iii) publishing in the mix – data and experimental scholarly publishing. 相似文献
7.
基于整体性视角,分析了若干国家的政府、科研资助机构、科研教育机构、学术出版界以及图书馆科研数
据开放政策体系,并指出所带来的启示。研究认为,数据治理、科研资助、科研管理与数据服务整合是进一步推动科
研数据开放共享的关键。 相似文献
8.
[目的/意义]图书馆开展出版服务已成为时代发展的必然要求。研究美国高校图书馆基于特色馆藏的出版研究,有助于促进我国高校图书馆更好地开展特色馆藏出版服务。[方法/过程]以加州大学图书馆、密歇根大学图书馆、犹他大学图书馆、堪萨斯州立大学图书馆、普渡大学图书馆以及亚利桑那大学图书馆为例,介绍其特色馆藏的出版情况,分析其出版特点：促进学术交流、与其他部门合作、支持开放存取。[结果/结论]对我国高校图书馆开展特色馆藏出版服务的启示是明确出版重点、选择合适的出版形式、加强多方合作、建立机构知识库、增强开放存取意识。 相似文献
9.
Beth E. Tumbleson 《The Reference Librarian》2013,54(3):224-234
Academic librarians engage students in the learning management system to provide information literacy instruction and answer individual reference questions related to scholarly research. When collaborating with faculty, embedded librarians deliver the library’s authoritative electronic resources to students working on research projects. Trends in academic publishing and technological innovations make possible online search for a generation reliant on mobile devices. Although students are able to access much digital content available through academic libraries and open access initiatives, they still appreciate guidance from embedded librarians who visit their learning management system courses to explain the complexities of scholarly research and suggest solutions. 相似文献
10.
David Nicholas Anthony Watkinson Abdullah Abrizah Blanca Rodríguez‐Bravo Cherifa Boukacem‐Zeghmouri Jie Xu Marzena
wigo&#x; Eti Herman 《Learned Publishing》2020,33(2):132-141
A study from the Harbingers research project provides a comprehensive assessment of the main features of the scholarly communications system as viewed by early career researchers (ECRs) in the final year of the study (2018). Aspects covered are: discovery and access, authorship practices, peer review, publishing strategies, open access publishing, open data, sharing, collaboration, social media, metrics, impact, reputation, libraries, publishers, and scholarly transformations. Nearly 120 science and social science researchers from seven countries were questioned about these 16 aspects. It was found that some scholarly features work well for ECRs, and in this category can be included: discovery and access, authorship practices, sharing, collaboration, and publishers. Reputation, publishing strategies, and impact are more problematical, and they, in turn, cause tensions regarding some other factors – social media, open access, and open data. Of the rest, libraries are largely invisible, and ECRs have conflicting views concerning ethical behaviour. Few envisage that transformational change will take place in the next 5 years. 相似文献
11.
This paper presents a case study of an advisory role that librarians successfully developed with faculty editors to increase the visibility and readership of an open access scholarly publication. The study represents an example of how expertise among liaison librarians and other library service professionals can be leveraged in new consultancy roles in support of evolving library service models. It also depicts local application of a hybrid model for librarianship that combines the functional specialist and subject librarian liaison roles in implementing advisory activities and recommendations. The liaison librarians successfully used their knowledge of scholarly communications and applied innovative bibliometric analysis to help enhance the discoverability and user experience of an online journal publication. The librarians made specific recommendations for optimizing journal website content organization, search functionality, metadata standards and marketing opportunities that were subsequently implemented by the editors and platform managers. The faculty editor places a high value on these recommendations, and the librarian advisory role continues to develop. Our study also outlines many of the essential considerations that scholar-editors and librarian advisors can use to help implement open access scholarly publishing projects successfully. 相似文献
12.
[目的/意义]为图书馆文献订购经费转化为开放出版经费提供基于事实的案例分析和支撑,以期引起科技发展管理机构、科研教育机构、图书馆及学者对开放出版及经费转化趋势的关注,促进科技信息交流传播和图书馆创新发展。[方法/过程]采用扎根理论方法,系统分析当前传统订购模式和开放出版模式并存局面造成的多重挑战,详细调查多种文献订购经费转化为开放出版经费的试验模式并进行对比分析,提出经费转化的必要性、可行性和策略建议。[结果/结论]图书馆订购经费向开放出版经费的转化具有明确的可行性和必要性,建议从建立"抵消模式"、制定经费转化规则和协调机制等多维角度积极推动文献订购经费向开放出版经费的全面转化。 相似文献
13.
基于OA期刊与OA知识库实现途径的比较分析 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
开放存取(Open Access)是一种全新的学术出版模式.文章归纳分析了实现开放存取出版的两种主要途径,并从质量控制、经费支持、知识产权、存储对象等方面对两者作一比较分析. 相似文献
14.
[目的/意义]为我国进一步推动落实已签署的OA2020倡议提供参考建议。[方法/过程]通过网络调查跟踪观测全球主要科技国家教育机构、研究机构、资助机构、图书馆和国际组织实施大规模学术期刊开放出版转换的行动，并梳理归纳国际主要出版商对转换所持的不同态度和行动，分析总结上述学术出版参与主体在转换中存在的问题和挑战，提出可能的应对策略。[结果/结论]通过分析，从承认国家差异性、转变图书馆角色、与出版商协商合作、解决开放出版目前问题、正视扣减和抵消制度不足5个方面提出进一步深化开放获取发展，实现OA2020倡议的可行性建议。 相似文献
15.
Francis Dodds 《Learned Publishing》2019,32(4):345-354
This article presents an analysis of key trends affecting the academic publishing industry. It reviews funding and sales, scholarly collaboration networks, developments in OA, and monograph publishing. These key areas were identified in an earlier article that asked whether academic publishing was evolving or going through a revolution. The review of funding and sales presented here shows a mixed market with growth being challenged as library funds and purchase choices affect expenditure. Scholarly collaboration networks were previously identified as a major threat to traditional publishing, and a review of this area demonstrates that greater sharing of content is empowering librarians and academics to take a stronger stand in publisher negotiations. OA continues to be debated, and a review of responses to Plan S (the most coordinated policy to date) demonstrates conflicting views within academia, funders, and publishers. OA has yet to revolutionize the existing business models. Similarly, monograph publishing remains slow to evolve, although there are increasing initiatives to adopt more open, and online, models. The conclusion of this review is that libraries are likely to be the key promoters of change in the publishing environment and are more influential than other players in forcing evolution. 相似文献
16.
国际学术出版开放式访问(OA):Ⅱ.开放访问期刊"作者付费模式"的实践与争论 总被引：3，自引：2，他引：1
综述当前国际学术出版界开放访问(OA)运动实践和理论研究的热点问题之一--OA期刊的"作者付费模式".讨论该经营模式的收费来源和方式,经营成本估算和现行的价格标准.对比了OA期刊与传统期刊的经营模式的区别和利弊,分析了OA期刊的可持续发展存在的问题. 相似文献
17.
Mary Anne KENNAN 《Learned Publishing》2007,20(2):138-146
This paper briefly describes the rapidly changing research evaluation and funding landscape in Australian universities, specifically in relation to open access and institutional repositories. Recent announcements indicate that funding and evaluation bodies are becoming increasingly concerned that publicly funded research be made publicly available. The paper then reports a survey of all levels of academic staff plus research students at one Australian university, conducted in May 2006, prior to the introduction of an institutional repository. The survey, in line with previously reported surveys, found that while there was a high level of engagement with scholarly publishing, there was a low level of awareness of, or concern with, either open access (‘green’ or ‘gold’) or the roles repositories can play in increasing accessibility of research. Practically, this indicates that much work needs to be done within this university to increase knowledge of, and change behaviours with regard to, open access and repositories if the university and its academics are to make the most of new funding requirements and research evaluation processes. 相似文献
18.
Francis Dodds 《Learned Publishing》2018,31(2):163-168
Key points
- Concerns about a crisis in monograph publishing date back to at least the 1990s, and for traditional journal publishing at least a decade.
- Two key trends behind concerns over book and journal models are pressures on funding and the emergence of open access.
- Despite predictions of a revolution, the academic publishing sector has proved remarkably resilient in adapting to market changes.
- Whilst showing some support for ‘open science’, even early career researchers remain committed to traditional publishing models.
- The growth in scholarly collaboration networks and in sharing across traditional boundaries is the more likely disrupter of traditional publishing.
19.
Frances Pinter 《Publishing Research Quarterly》2012,28(3):183-191
Over the past two decades, sales of monographs have shrunk by 90?% causing prices to rise dramatically as fewer copies are sold. University libraries struggle to assemble adequate collections, and students and scholars are deprived access, especially in the developing world. Open access can play an important role in ensuring both access to knowledge and encouraging the growth of new markets for scholarly books. This article argues that by facilitating a truly global approach to funding the up-front costs of publishing and open access, there is a sustainable future for the specialist academic ??long form publication??. Knowledge Unlatched is a new initiative that is creating an international library consortium through which publishers will be able to recover their fixed costs while at the same time reducing prices for libraries. 相似文献
20.
不同学术出版模式的特征及其影响研究 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
随着学术交流方式的演变,传统学术出版模式已经不能有效服务于学术信息的交流和传播,导致不同学术出版模式的产生。学者们的深入研究发现当前情况下出版模式还不可能完全转变,实现理想中的免费且无限制的模式,因此,订阅出版、开放存取和自存档三种学术出版模式并存的同时,还产生了一些混合模式和可选择模式。文章在系统分析订阅出版,开放存取和自存档三种学术出版模式的特征之后,从宏观角度探讨了不同学术出版模式对科研和社会经济产生的影响,并从访问和许可两个角度分析了不同学术出版模式的影响因素和影响机制。该文为2009年第六期“医学OA期刊”专题文章之一。 相似文献