共查询到19条相似文献，搜索用时 187 毫秒
1.
技术型企业从两个途径获得技术创新知识,一是通过企业内部过程进行知识的积累和创造;二是通过企业外部过程,与市场进行知识交换、建立技术战略联盟分享和传递知识。技术战略联盟间在知识转移过程中获得经济收益,但同时联盟企业之间的独立性、知识的特殊性不得不让企业考虑知识产权的自我保护问题。本研究通过文献讨论、问卷开发与调查和统计建模过程,结果发现:技术战略联盟之间形成了一种特殊的"竞合"关系,无论企业与竞争对手还是与非营利性组织形成技术战略联盟,知识转移和交换均可以使企业提升创新绩效。并且,企业在与技术战略联盟进行合作过程中,可以采用技术成果的法律保护、竞争性保护措施以及在企业内进行知识产权管理实践,维护企业的核心能力,促进企业的创新效果。这种技术成果的保护过程在企业与竞争市场形成技术战略联盟的知识转移过程中更加有效。 相似文献
2.
信任关系对战略联盟知识转移的影响 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
经济一体化和全球化加速了企业战略联盟的形成,有效知识转移是战略联盟获得核心能力的重要内容。通过分析信任关系对战略联盟的影响,提出建立战略联盟信任关系的方法。 相似文献
3.
中外企业战略联盟知识转移效率的实证分析 总被引：26，自引：1，他引：26
本文从知识的属性出发分析了战略联盟中知识转移的基本过程,进而讨论了在中外企业战略联盟中影响知识转移效率的因素,认为中外企业之间的差异、联盟成员间的沟通以及联盟所采用的控制方式将决定中外联盟中知识转移的效率。通过调查问卷获得142家中外联盟的数据,本文对所提出的假说进行了检验,结果表明联盟成员间的管理差异及对正式控制的依赖将降低知识转移的效率,而联盟当中的沟通和对社会控制的差异将提高知识转移的效率。 相似文献
4.
高技术企业知识联盟中的知识转移研究 总被引：24，自引：2，他引：24
高技术企业知识联盟依托知识这一载体，使高技术企业获得市场竞争优势。本文通过对高技术企业知识联盟中的知识转移这一过程的系统研究，分析了阻碍知识转移的主要因素，提出了定量化的知识转移一般模式、形成机理和收益分配方案，对提升高技术企业的核心竞争力具有重要意义，也逐渐成为高技术企业战略联盟合作的主流趋势。 相似文献
5.
企业战略联盟中的知识转移 总被引：12，自引：0，他引：12
本文论述了企业联盟从产品联盟到知识联盟的演进，提出知识转移是企业联盟成功的关键。讨论了不同的知识类型和企业联盟形式的关系。通过对知识转移一般过程和影响转移因素的分析，文章提出企业联盟知识转移的关键是建立知识转移的情境，并从战略、组织、文化三个维度分析了知识转移情境的建设。 相似文献
6.
基于知识观的战略联盟机理分析 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
从知识分工与积累、知识市场的路径依赖和知识能力过剩3种经典原理分析战略联盟形成的机理。进一步以企业知识理论揭示战略联盟过程中知识聚合、重组和激活的形成方式,提出了基于知识观的战略联盟方式的选择模式。 相似文献
7.
8.
企业联盟研发:风险与防范 总被引：23，自引：1，他引：23
越来越多的企业通过建立战略联盟谋求持续竞争优势,研发型战略联盟研发是其中的重要选择之一。联盟研发使企业对资源的配置跨越了自身的边界,促进了不同企业知识与能力的相互补充。同时,研发联盟不可避免地带来企业自身知识与能力的流失与扩散。企业在通过联盟推动研发的过程中,必须正确认识这一战略形式本身具有的风险性,有效控制风险。 相似文献
9.
10.
本文探讨了企业战略联盟知识管理的内涵与运作机制,重点探讨了知识的转移与共享、整合与碰撞及知识的保护;并结合我国实际,提出了建立企业战略联盟尤其是跨国战略联盟时,应采取的若干知识管理的对策建议。确保联盟企业实现共享知识——提升效益——竞争优势的相互促进和良性循环。 相似文献
11.
From the resource-based view, strategic alliances can be defined by a long-term cooperative arrangement between two or more independent firms that exchange and share resources to gain market power and competitive advantage. Since knowledge has become the critical element for firms to achieve competitive advantage, one goal of strategic alliances can be realized by acquiring knowledge through partners. In this paper, the process of knowledge creation in strategic alliances is explained and clarified based on an evolutionary perspective. In addition, a mathematical representation is used to show how knowledge is created in strategic alliances, why firms are willing to create and share knowledge by entering into alliances, and what conditions are required to achieve successful knowledge creation under such arrangements. 相似文献
12.
Coopetition analyses the simultaneity of competitive and cooperative behaviours between rival firms. Scholars have focused their attention on strategic alliances, but specific coopetition issues are seldom addressed through in-depth studies. On the basis of inter-organizational relationships, coopetition provides partners with a competitive advantage by enhancing their knowledge creation and transfer, but exposes firms to the risk that rivals may capture their own knowledge. In this, it becomes necessary for firms to mix knowledge creation and transfer strategies with knowledge protection practices. This paper reports on a qualitative study of 37 firms and sheds light on the specific knowledge development process for the partners engaged in coopetition. 相似文献
13.
跨国技术战略联盟合作战略动机与联盟稳定 《科学学研究》2015,33(8):1161-1173
越来越多的国内高技术企业通过建立跨国技术战略联盟的方式进行技术创新与合作。本文通过量表设计、问卷调查并收集国内325家建立了跨国技术战略联盟的高技术企业有效研究样本,对提出的研究假设和理论框架进行实证分析,研究发现：第一,我国高技术企业在建立跨国技术战略联盟过程中,高效的合作机制的建立和具备一定的战略动机来安排联盟过程尤为重要;第二,有效的战略联盟动机可以正向调节跨国技术战略联盟合作机制和联盟稳定的关系;第三,在控制变量的检验过程中,越是市场化的企业、联盟合作时间越长,联盟的制度越稳定和成熟。高技术企业与合作联盟成员的文化距离和差异越大,联盟越不稳定。高技术企业具备一定的国际化经验可以提升跨国技术联盟合作中的质量。跨国合作技术战略联盟的企业之间具有一定的战略资源互补性,可以提高联盟的稳定性。 相似文献
14.
《The Journal of High Technology Management Research》2001,12(2):205-226
In many high technology industries, strategic alliances have become important for improving a firm's financial performance by providing knowledge that can be used to develop the capabilities needed to introduce new products. Therefore, researchers have examined those characteristics of alliances that can contribute to the performance of high technology companies. There is agreement that the structure and knowledge flows within alliances can affect a firm's innovativeness. However, to date, researchers have studied alliances as individual events or transactions, failing to recognize their synergistic effects as a coherent portfolio. Viewing alliances as a portfolio of strategic agreements, we suggest that portfolio characteristics will be associated with a high technology firm's innovative and financial performance. Also, we suggest that portfolio characteristics will influence absorptive capacity. We test these propositions using a sample of 2456 alliances formed by 143 biopharmaceutical firms. The results indicate that alliance portfolio characteristics and absorptive capacity jointly influence performance. The implications of these findings for high technology firms are discussed. 相似文献
15.
16.
We explore how an incumbent firm's internal knowledge and organization structure influences its strategic alliance formation. We propose that the firm's knowledge breadth and the centrality of its R&D organization structure positively influence its absorptive capacity, and consequently, its propensity to form strategic alliances. We also argue that the centrality of the R&D organization structure may be a substitute for the breadth of the knowledge base. We validate our ideas using data on 2647 strategic alliances formed over the period of 1993-2002 by 43 major biopharmaceutical firms in the U.S. and Europe. Our discussion focuses on the application of the knowledge-based view of the firm to strategic alliance research. The implications for public policy in the biopharmaceutical industry are also emphasized. 相似文献
17.
Strategic alliances are important channels for interfirm learning, especially for small firms that are resource constrained. Of the several alliance attributes, technological distance between partners (measured as the distance between partners’ innovative outcomes) is shown to have a significant influence on the learning benefits from strategic alliances. Drawing upon the theory of recombination, our study argues that the influence of technological distance on learning is best understood by not only measuring the distance between innovative outcomes, but by also taking into consideration the knowledge elements underlying the innovative outcomes. We develop a concept of knowledge base homogeneity that captures the extent to which the innovative outcomes of partnering firms draw upon similar sets of knowledge elements. Using patent and alliance data from 201 small biotechnology firms during the period 1996–2010, we confirm that the technological distance has an inverted u-shaped relationship on interfirm learning. We further demonstrate that this u-shaped relationship is moderated by the knowledge base homogeneity between partners, such that benefits of technological distance are enhanced and the costs of technological distance are mitigated when the knowledge base homogeneity between alliance partners is high. The results have important implications for interfirm learning, especially in the context of small firms that are limited in their knowledge stocks. 相似文献
18.