共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 156 毫秒
1.
社群主义是个人主义极端发达的产物,是对个人主义不足的弥补。社群主义强调社群优先于个人,公共利益优先于个人权利,善优先于正义。社群主义认为,道德是维系社群的根基。社群主义对建设和谐社会的启示是:要重视道德教育,注重公民教育、公德教育和基本价值观教育,培养学生的公民意识和类人格。 相似文献
2.
作为对自由主义的批判,社群主义主张道德优先于权利,倡导基于道德的正义,淡化单子式个人的权利,增强社群的共同利益。它批判自由主义教育公正的不平等,认为教育公正需要以仁爱和德性为前提,达成社群内部的公意,进而实现社群成员的平等。 相似文献
3.
社群主义与自由主义就正义问题展开了激烈的争论:社群主义深刻地批判了自由主义的个人主义哲学基础,认为个人不能脱离社群;批判了正义优先性的观点,认为正义不能独立于善;批判了普遍性的观点,认为正义不是超历史的;建构了以社群观为核心的政治哲学,认为个人的德性应该接受社群善的引导。社群主义对自由主义形成了很大的冲击,但从目前的趋势看不会动摇自由主义的主导地位,同时我们也得看到社群主义的不足。 相似文献
4.
教育政策规范要有效地实现对教育实践活动的价值,其本身的正义品性至关重要.只有教育政策规范建立在正义伦理基础之上,教育政策伦理所追求的教育善才是可能的和可行的.为实现公民的尊严与福祉,正义的教育政策伦理应以保障公民的受教育权利为终极价值诉求,彰显其存在的必要性、合理性与正当性.而建立公开透明、多元参与的教育政策"善治"机制是保障公民受教育权利和生成正义教育政策的路径. 相似文献
5.
李先桃 《湖南师范大学社会科学学报》2008,37(2):30-33
古希腊古罗马是西方文明的摇篮,社群主义的源头同样可以追溯到古希腊哲学家亚里士多德。亚里士多德对社群主义的影响很大,当代社群主义者的社群(共同体)概念就导源于亚里士多德,他关于个人与社群的关系、德性理论、正义理论中很多思想也给社群主义以很大启发,有很多观点直接影响了社群主义并被他们吸收。 相似文献
6.
社群主义作为自由主义的批判者出现,以历史主义的方法对自由主义理论基础的自我观、正义观展开了批评,他们认为是历史构成了个人而不是像自由主义认为的个人独立于历史与社会之外进行价值选择;同样,正义的价值和内容也都来自于历史和传统,离开历史的正义只是一个空洞而抽象的形式概念。然而社群主义的历史观也同样陷入了这种先验抽象的陷阱,历史在社群主义者那里也成了僵化的凌驾于人之上的先在物。历史应该是生成中的历史,是人的历史。 相似文献
7.
教育正义是教育现代化的基本价值,是世界各国教育政策的基本出发点。它不仅是学者们普遍关心的一个理论问题,更是大众沉思的一个现实问题。我国当代教育中仍然存在着一些突出的正义问题。本刊约请五位专家、学者分别从正义的概念辨析、教育正义的二重性、教育正义的境界、课程内容的正义性以及教育结果的正义性等五个方面进行了探讨。这对于构建适合我国国情的正义的教育政策具有积极的启发意义。现予刊发,以飨读者。 相似文献
8.
教育正义是教育现代化的基本价值,是世界各国教育政策的基本出发点。它不仅是学者们普遍关心的一个理论问题,更是大众沉思的一个现实问题。我国当代教育中仍然存在着一些突出的正义问题。本刊约请五位专家、学者分别从正义的概念辨析、教育正义的二重性、教育正义的境界、课程内容的正义性以及教育结果的正义性等五个方面进行了探讨。这对于构建适合我国国情的正义的教育政策具有积极的启发意义。现予刊发,以飨读者。 相似文献
9.
10.
教育正义是教育现代化的基本价值,是世界各国教育政策的基本出发点。它不仅是学者们普遍关心的一个理论问题,更是大众沉思的一个现实问题。我国当代教育中仍然存在着一些突出的正义问题。本刊约请五位专家、学者分别从正义的概念辨析、教育正义的二重性、教育正义的境界、课程内容的正义性以及教育结果的正义性等五个方面进行了探讨。这对于构建适合我国国情的正义的教育政策具有积极的启发意义。现予刊发,以飨读者。 相似文献
11.
对于教育公正和均衡的坚守与追求是美国社区学院教育一直以来的发展目标。21世纪以来,美国社会对教育公正更高层次的追求和对教育质量均衡发展的关注,推动了美国社区学院的教育改革。由此,美国政府围绕教育公正和均衡的发展目标,对教育范式、合作体系和教育资金的资助与流动等方面进行实践规范,以此追求教育质量公正的价值,保证教育机会平等。借鉴美国社区学院教育改革的成效与特点,为我国高等职业教育改革提供一些经验和思路,对我国建设公正且高质量的高等职业教育具有重大意义。 相似文献
12.
教育政策分析的制度伦理视角 总被引：13，自引：1，他引：12
张烨 《清华大学教育研究》2005,26(1):34-39
教育制度伦理是教育政策和教育制度价值诉求的契合点,教育政策分析必然关联制度伦理。教育公正作为教育制度伦理的核心范畴,也必然成为教育政策价值诉求的基本点。从制度伦理的角度审视教育政策的制定和实施,是一种有价值的分析视角。 相似文献
13.
肖广军 《河南职业技术师范学院学报(职业教育版)》2008,(2):9-12
从罗尔斯的平等自由原则和机会的公正平等原则出发,可以推演出教育制度的正义原则。然而从经费政策、教师政策、课程政策和高考制度四个方面分析可以看出,我国教育制度存在着非正义现象。分析教育制度的非正义性,是为了更好的建设或完善,使其在构建社会主义和谐社会建设中发挥更大的正面功能。 相似文献
14.
This article uses critical discourse analysis in order to discuss the equity and social justice implications of an envisaged education reform agenda in Cyprus, as articulated by two consultation reports commissioned by the World Bank. The reports highlight, inter alia, the imperative to improve teaching and enhance accountability regimes with regard to students’ learning. Selected extracts from these documents are analyzed in order to highlight the absence of a social justice discourse in the rhetoric of educational reforms, despite the alleged centrality of a social justice discourse in official policy. The reports fail to include issues of social justice and learner diversity in discussing the necessity to strengthen the existing teacher policy framework and to mobilize structural educational reforms. This omission is indicative of the neoliberal imperatives that drive the envisaged education policy reforms as well as the low priority attributed to issues of equity and learner diversity, with particular reference to students designated as having special educational needs and/or disabilities. 相似文献
15.
从伦理学的角度看教育公正 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
朱林 《江西教育学院学报》2005,26(2):35-38
公正维护的是某一社会共同体的健康存在和正常运转，教育公正作为教育伦理中的一个重要的范畴，不仅仅关涉到教育本身的成败，而且对于整个国家的发展与进步也都有着重要的意义。在对历史上的教育公正观和原则进行考察之后，结合国内教育公正中存在的问题，我们认为应把教育机制提升到社会公正的层面上来看待，基于一种平等的原则，从维护个人权利的角度出发，来解决今天教育当中存在的不公正问题，在这一过程中，政府也负有不可推卸的责任。 相似文献
16.
《Africa Education Review》2013,10(2):302-317
Abstract Central to the pursuit of education and its functions like assessment, is social justice. Given the (still) existing inequalities brought about by years of neglect, it is clear that the building of a just society is indeed fraught with challenges. This article explores the extent to which all learners in South Africa are afforded fair treatment and an impartial share of what the education system through assessment practices can offer them. In attempting to illuminate this issue, we will start by providing a brief overview of assessment policy initiatives and the current assessment system in South Africa. This will be followed by a conceptual analysis of assessment practices and their social justice implications for learners by using Cribb and Gerwitz's (2003) key dimensions of social justice, namely the distribution of educational resources, recognition and respect for cultural differences and participation. Through this analysis we conclude that, while acknowledging the massive impact of family/community circumstances and poor educational provision, unfair assessment practices as discussed remain an important dimension of the degradation of social justice in the South African education system. Many learners, despite efforts to ensure more just assessment practices, are still marginalised and do not reap the benefits that can support them in developing their full potential. 相似文献
17.
Educational leadership and social activism: a call for action 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
Lauren P. Hoffman 《Journal of educational administration and history》2009,41(4):391-410
The purpose of this article is to argue for a social activist stance in educational leadership that fundamentally addresses social change and human emancipation. This call for social activism is framed within neoliberal, neoconservative, and authoritarian populist discourses in the USA, which to social justice educators and leaders had devastating effects on education. Empirical data from an activist high school principal, activist university professor, and activist priest reflects their development of political clarity, political capacity, political collaboration, and an ethic of risk. It is suggested that the work of socially active educational leaders needs to be broadened to include such things as public policy advocacy, networking, organising, community development, and scholarship. Finally, the article concludes with a variety of ways educational leaders can demonstrate their social, moral, and political activism as they challenge the status quo, fight for social justice, and come to understand the politicised notion of leadership. 相似文献
18.
Sharon Gewirtz 《教育政策杂志》2013,28(4):469-484
Within recent studies of education policy, social justice has been an under‐theorized concept. This paper is an attempt to begin to remedy this situation. It critically examines some of the most prominent ways in which social justice has been and is being thought about within various traditions of social theory and concludes by sketching out a framework for conceptualizing social justice in the context of education policy research. However, the main purpose of the paper is not to provide a definitive conceptualization of social justice but to open up a debate which might usefully inform the work of the education policy research community. 相似文献
19.
弱势教育部门“国民待遇”问题的政策研究 总被引：5，自引：0，他引：5
我国政府对弱势教育部门具有公共产品政策情怀,而公众则对弱势教育产品持有私人物品消费立场,两者的冲突构成弱势教育部门市场竞争能力障碍,损害了弱势教育部门的发展机遇与社会公正。政府有责任在提高教育资源配置效率的同时,消除双重政策,平衡国家利益、部门利益与私人利益,为弱势教育部门提供公平保护,促进教育系统安全运行与社会协调发展。 相似文献
20.
Kysa Nygreen 《Equity & Excellence in Education》2016,49(2):202-214
This article examines a grassroots parent organizing effort in a large, high-poverty, urban school district. Drawing from ethnographic field research at a community-based popular education organization, the study describes how parent organizers worked to educate and mobilize Latina/o immigrant parents on issues of educational justice and equity. It identifies three pillars of their approach—a social theory, a theory of change, and a theory of knowledge— and argues that these were not reducible to a set of practices or methods; rather, they constituted a coherent paradigm of educational justice. This paradigm differs in significant ways from the neoliberal justice paradigm that currently dominates education reform and policy. By examining points of tension between these two competing paradigms, this article seeks to accomplish two aims. First, it aims to deepen our understanding of how underlying paradigms of educational justice shape the work of educating, organizing, and reforming schools. Second, it aims to expose the cultural specificity, or non-universality, of the neoliberal paradigm in order to challenge its hegemonic status in education reform and policy. 相似文献