共查询到18条相似文献，搜索用时 156 毫秒
1.
通过对华中科技大学和武汉大学861名高校图书馆用户对Web2．0各种应用形式的使用与重要性认知、图书馆信息组织现状的满意度、参与图书馆信息组织的意愿、参与形式及障碍因素等情况的调查发现,用户参与图书馆信息组织的意愿明确,缺乏相关信息组织技能是其参与图书馆信息组织的主要障碍。图书馆应从改善信息组织现状、加强Web2．0技术培训、建立激励用户参与的长效机制等途径吸引更多用户参与图书馆信息组织。 相似文献
2.
Web2.0环境下越来越多的用户参与到图书馆信息组织过程中,为了了解用户参与图书馆信息组织的意识和意愿,对武汉大学在校师生进行问卷调查。调查显示,用户对Web2.0相关技术较熟悉并经常使用,具备参与图书馆信息组织的能力;用户普遍认同参与图书馆信息组织会对自己有帮助,有着较高的参与意愿;不少用户缺乏参与意识,对参与方式不够了解。图书馆可通过加强对用户参与图书馆信息组织方式的宣传、重视用户培训、采取适当的激励措施等方法,促使用户积极参与图书馆信息组织。 相似文献
3.
Web2.0技术是用户参与图书馆信息组织的重要方式.选取我国14所具有代表性的图书馆,对其应用Web2.0方式组织信息的现状进行全面调查,并对每一种Web2.0方式应用的质量情况进行深入剖析,从而了解Web2.0环境下用户参与图书馆信息组织的质量状况.调查发现我国Web2.0组织方式存在应用范围小、用途较为单一、功能不够完善等问题,针对这些问题提出解决对策. 相似文献
4.
在Web2.0环境下,用户参与已成为高校图书馆信息服务的趋向.图书馆用户参与行为的影响因素主要来自用户个体和信息环境两个方面.个体因素主要包括个人心理、个人信息素质及信息动机,信息环境因素包括图书馆建立的信息网站和用户群.高校图书馆应充分利用这些影响因素,采取措施,引导用户参与信息服务. 相似文献
5.
Web2.0环境下图书馆员对用户参与信息组织认知的调查分析 总被引：2，自引：1，他引：1
以图书馆员为调查对象,调查馆员对用户参与Web2.0环境下图书馆信息组织的认知情况,分析用户参与图书馆信息组织所面临的主要问题,并提出相应的改进建议。 相似文献
6.
Web2.0环境下用户参与的图书馆信息组织模式建构 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
文章在比较用户参与图书馆信息组织不同形式的基础上,分析用户参与的信息组织模式的主要特征及功能,并构建了在Web2.0环境下用户参与的图书馆信息组织模式平台. 相似文献
7.
Web 2.0环境下基于用户参与的信息组织研究 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
Web2．0网络环境的迅猛发展使得信息组织日趋重要,文章从Web2．0网络环境下的信息组织的背景出发,分析了Web2．0环境下信息组织的特点,主要探讨了基于用户参与的信息组织。 相似文献
8.
[目的/意义]针对图书馆特色数字馆藏建设中用户参与度低、参与持续性弱的问题,尝试建立用户参与保障机制,引导图书馆系统地考虑用户参与机制的引入问题,提高用户的持续参与度。[方法/过程]基于"志愿者参与图书馆资源和服务意愿调查"和"用户参与数字特色馆藏建设意愿调查"两个问卷调查,了解用户参与动机、期望获得的激励要素和用户眼中的参与阻碍要素,根据调查结果分析和国内外图书馆用户参实践,概括用户参与机制的基本要素,构建用户参与保障机制方案。[结果/结论]建立包括重点用户寻找和招募机制、宣传推广机制、激励引导机制、管理支持机制、质量控制机制所构成的保障机制方案,并说明机制建立过程中需要注意的问题。 相似文献
9.
Web2．0网络环境的迅猛发展使得信息组织日趋重要,文章从Web2．0网络环境下的信息组织的背景出发,分析了Web2．0环境下信息组织的特点,主要探讨了基于用户参与的信息组织。 相似文献
10.
以当前信息环境与用户信息需求的变化对图书馆信息组织带来的挑战为背景,运用SWOT分析方法对Web2.0环境下图书馆信息组织现状进行分析,认为Web2.0环境下图书馆信息组织的变革方向是用户参与的信息组织模式.该模式的内涵包括模式的主体、模式实现的技术与平台、模式的保障机制等,并从理论建构、实践基础、用户满意度、专家访谈等多角度验证该模式的可行性,最后分析该模式对图书馆学的影响. 相似文献
11.
ABSTRACT The Library 2.0 movement emerged as a response to the technologies and concepts in the Web 2.0 movement and has been taking the library world by storm. Web 2.0 takes the stagnant Web 1.0 and makes it more user-driven, collaborative, participatory, and personalized. Library 2.0 takes the tools of Web 2.0 and moves them into a library setting with libraries that are user-centered, networking faculty, students, and librarians to create a vital and evolving organization designed to meet the needs of the current information culture. Library 2.0 is especially relevant to institutions providing services to off-campus students. Many students taking courses remotely have full-time jobs and busy lives beyond their coursework. Providing those students with a customizable, personalized, and collaborative library assists in their success as a student. Using Web 2.0 technologies and other social networking tools in the library setting brings the library to our users, making them more relevant in today's information society. 相似文献
12.
基于Web2.0的图书馆服务现状调查与分析——以华中地区高校图书馆为例 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
通过对华中地区七所高校图书馆的调查研究,分析了目前Web2.0的技术和服务在高校图书馆中的应用现状。包括高校图书馆2.0应用情况,用户对图书馆2.0服务的使用和需求情况,并对改进图书馆2.0的服务提出了意见和建议。 相似文献
13.
Mark-Shane E. Scale 《图书馆管理杂志》2013,53(7-8):933-950
ABSTRACT Cloud computing and Web collaboration are shaping 21st-century libraries. These 2 developments seem to be behind the newest developments in library services and are driving library automation. The 2 are impacting library work by providing the library administrator with opportunities, especially for greater synergies among various individuals over dispersed locations. While the literature indicates ambivalence about these twin developments among library and information professionals, the administrators of distance library services have no choice but to engage in the use of cloud computing technologies and Web collaboration in order to remain relevant to users. Unfortunately, in doing this, distance services librarians will need to trade off ownership and control, trusting outsiders, while teaching users to be critical of the information gathered from collaborative sources. 相似文献
14.
《Journal of Web Librarianship》2013,7(4):299-321
The transition to a new architecture and design for an academic library Web site does not always proceed smoothly. In this case study, a library at a large research university hired an outside Web development contractor to create a new architecture and design for the university's Web site using dotCMS, an open-source content management system. The library participated in the design and development process along with other campus units. Because the university-wide process focused on marketing the university to prospective students, parents, and donors, the contractor's fact-finding process focused on how the library's site design could incorporate Web 2.0 technologies. The resulting library Web site showcased Web 2.0 technology more than it provided users with access to library resources. The library's users quickly communicated their dissatisfaction and confusion, which led to some immediate changes and a commitment to redesign the site based on expressed and demonstrated user needs. The library then hired another contractor to conduct iterative usability testing on both the new site and prototypes for a redesigned version. The testing showed that Web 2.0 technology that does not meet existing user needs creates obstacles for both novice and experienced users. In collaboration with the university's information technology unit, the library developed and launched a revised Web site, which helped users connect to the resources they needed. In the upgrade, Google Search Appliance replaced the native dotCMS search functionality. The authors of this case study demonstrate that libraries may need to advocate for different Web design priorities than those used at the university-wide level and that working with outside contractors presents different challenges and opportunities depending on the contractor's hiring unit. These experiences also demonstrate that libraries can do a better job learning about their users when they lead the fact-finding process. Following these experiences, the library committed to conducting iterative usability testing on a regular basis. 相似文献
15.
Web 2.0时代OPAC发展及书目创新服务的思考 总被引：24，自引：0，他引：24
简述Web2.0、图书馆2.0以及OPAC 2.0的概念和特点，从Web2.0时代图书馆OPAC“以用户为中心”的理念出发，对其相关功能的加强、改进和革新进行详细分析。在此基础上，深入思考为适应这种OPAC的发展趋势，图书馆书目服务机构应如何转变传统思路，如何为提升书目服务效率采取各项有效措施。 相似文献
16.
《Journal of Web Librarianship》2013,7(1):41-59
Abstract Many libraries use RSS to syndicate information about their collections to users. A survey of 65 academic libraries revealed their most common use for RSS is to disseminate information about library holdings, such as lists of new acquisitions. Even though typical RSS feeds are ill suited to the task of carrying rich bibliographic metadata, great potential exists for developing applications that can exploit metadata exposed to Web services via RSS. Using the MODS metadata format, entire catalog records can be seamlessly embedded in RSS 2.0 feeds. Existing tools, such as Library of Congress Java toolkits and XSLT stylesheets, can facilitate this process, while a new XSLT stylesheet may be used to create the RSS feeds complete with MODS records. As an example of the added functionality these MODS/RSS feeds can offer, records from a MODS-enriched RSS feed can be ingested into a non-RSS application such as Zotero. As more emerging library technologies use Web services architectures to handle data objects, the ability to syndicate catalog records will become more critical to providing innovative library Web services. 相似文献
17.
18.
The purpose of this paper is to provide a reconnaissance of major academic libraries located in Australia, Canada, the U.K. and U.S.A. that have embraced Web 2.0 tools for enhancing library services. The research is based on a survey of websites of 277 university libraries. The checkpoints used for this evaluative study were given by Nguyen (2008) for evaluating various Web 2.0 tools. Additional checkpoints were arrived at after visiting and browsing the various sites. The findings of the study acknowledge the strength of Web 2.0 tools in improving library services for users. Really Simple Syndication (RSS), Instant Messaging (IM) and blogs are popular in academic libraries. The paper concludes by offering best practices for implementing Web 2.0 tools in academic libraries. 相似文献