共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 156 毫秒
1.
《国际新闻界》新闻学年度课题组 《国际新闻界》2023,(1):6-24
本文从2022年近30种中文学术期刊（包括港台地区）遴选出在研究问题、观点视角以及论证方式等方面较为创新的新闻学论文,并从新闻研究元问题、新冠疫情下的新闻报道的媒介建构、新闻从业者研究、数字新闻生产的平台逻辑、新闻接受者研究、嬗变的新闻真实性、中国新闻业转型研究、新闻职业伦理的多维视角、中国新闻场域中的地方实践以及中国新闻史研究等十个话题勾勒过去一年中国新闻学的知识版图。研究发现,2022年中国新闻学研究的主要特点呈现在以下三个方面：一是,新闻理论研究注重对学科范式与经典新闻观念的持续反思;二是,研究者们在平台逻辑与新闻业转型的双重语境下聚焦新闻生产的多元行动者,其中新闻从业者研究尤其凸显,体现了数字技术迷思在学术场域中的祛魅;三是,新闻史研究着力凸显以报刊实践为中心的传统研究路径,注重对报刊的社会话语建构、报界边缘群体以及报刊空间实践等议题的开掘与深耕。 相似文献
2.
建设中国新闻学自主知识体系需从“概念”入手。加深对概念建构与阐释的认识论与方法论理解,对探索中国新闻学概念研究的理论、方法与技巧具有重要意义。概念史通过研究概念“鞍型期”的意义变化来理解历史发展规律;比较政治学概念分析通过对概念的跨案例适用情况分析,提出跨语境概念建构与分析的路径;实践哲学概念思辨重视概念本体论层面的自我反思与自我完善。这三种概念研究理论体现了历史学、政治学、哲学独特的概念思维方式,这为当下中国新闻学概念研究提供了重要的视角与理论资源。 相似文献
3.
以介入性为特征的新闻文化在全球范围内日渐兴起,研究者可以通过比较视角、历时视角与规范视角来考察不同社会中介入性新闻的实践模式及其文化特征。比较视角下,“群众路线”等中国特色话语有益于介入性新闻文化话语体系的搭建;历时视角下,全球新闻业在不同阶段都呈现出积极介入社会的实践要求;规范视角下,数字新闻业主张将社会问题化约为行业问题来应对由信息生态转型所引发的一系列观念冲突。研究者应当以人本主义为价值锚点,挖掘数字新闻业与用户之间的亲密关系,并积极探索“介入性”之于数字新闻学的理论潜力。 相似文献
4.
2019年中国正式进入5G时代,中国新闻传播史研究与传媒发变革时代的发展交相辉映,涌现出一大批新闻传播史研究成果。综观2019年中国新闻传播史研究体现出以下特点:新中国70年、“五四”运动100年,周年性反思特征明显;报刊报人仍是研究重心,报刊阅读史成果涌现;新闻传播教育史研究持续升温;新闻传播思想史研究亮点突出;新闻图史研究继续受到关注;2019年中国新闻传播史研究在坚守与创新中,研究的外延不断拓展发展。 相似文献
5.
网络媒介是继报纸、电视、广播以来的第四种媒体传播形式。在以互联网为基础的网络媒体,使得新闻学理论发生了深刻的变革,并推动着新闻学理论的创新。本文主要从网络媒介内涵、网络媒介下新闻的传播方式变革和时空变革以及网络媒介视角下的新闻学理论创新三个方面展开探讨,以期对新闻学理论领域研究有所帮助。 相似文献
6.
戈公振是新闻事业的卓然实践者和新闻学研究大家。他从资产阶级新闻思想出发。坚持以“自由为体、西学为用”的现代价值取向,倡导新闻自由,把西方的新闻学基本理论与中国当时最高水平的新闻实践相结合,第一个从平民角度比较系统地提出了报刊在推动国家民主政治建设中的重要作用。 相似文献
7.
中国近代报刊史和近代中国城市的变迁是紧密交织在一起的,城市是窥视中国近代报业发展历程的一个非常重要的面向。在以政治史、革命史范式为主导的近代中国报刊史研究中,城市与报刊的关系被"需要与被需要"的框架所束缚。本文认为可以在近代城市史的视角下,重视近代城市政治、经济、文化各个层面对报刊产生的影响,从而突破"需要与被需要"的解释框架,构建一个立体的、丰富的、互动的城市与报刊关系。 相似文献
8.
9.
本文以来自三个国家、共84位一线新闻从业者的深度访谈资料为经验基础,通过扎根理论,尝试对"数字新闻学"成为一种新新闻理论体系的现实性和可能性进行探索。研究认为,数字新闻学在四个方面对传统新闻学体系实现了范式性突破:技术在新闻业态中日趋扮演生态性角色,数字新闻从业者的技工化,基于情感网络的新闻业的成型,价值极化和价值虚无成为新闻业的持续性危机。上述突破使得"数字新闻学"作为一个新的理论体系具有了经验和逻辑基础。本文进而从价值内核、核心概念、研究实践和批判理论四个方面,尝试建构数字新闻学理论体系的具体维度。 相似文献
10.
王韬是19世纪中国著名的思想学家,我国历史上第一位报刊政论家,他被誉为中国新闻记者之父,亦被称为“具在专门办报思想第一人”.笔者认为,王韬先生之所以能得如此高度评价,与他的新闻思想密不可分:重视报纸信息传播、“立言”的新闻功能观;强调报纸在社会变革中作用的新闻政论观;提倡品行诚正,博古通今的新闻人才观等.正是得益于这在当时极具震撼力的大胆思想,使后世得到启蒙,而其报刊实践及系统的报刊理论又奠定了我国近代报刊的基础,从而展示了王韬对中国新闻学的突出贡献. 相似文献
11.
在当代中国新闻学研究的学科层面,实际存在着多种名称或概念(有些准确,有些模糊),诸如新闻学、党报理论、中国特色社会主义新闻学、马克思主义新闻观(新闻学)等,它们之间互相联系,但又互有区别。最基本的关系是:党报理论是中国特色新闻学的核心内容,马克思主义新闻观是中国特色新闻学的理论立场和基本方法。因而,中国特色社会主义新闻学,就是以中国新闻现象、新闻活动特别是以"党媒"新闻宣传活动、新闻舆论活动为主要研究对象,以马克思主义为基本立场、观点和方法,以党报(党媒)理论为核心内容的新闻学。其中的"中国特色"是当代中国新闻学的特征描述,"社会主义"则是当代中国新闻学性质定位。中国特色社会主义新闻学与新闻学在研究对象、研究目的、研究的价值取向上虽有相同之处,但重点有所不同。 相似文献
12.
本研究梳理出四种报业研究取径:一,时间序列的编年史;二,政治经济学的结构分析;三,文化领导权的策略共谋;四,历史系谱的再现与重构。第一种为传统史学方法的线性叙事,提供丰富的史料,而较乏分析的观点。第二及第三种,政治经济学与文化领导权的解释,则将焦点置于报业与报人的主体能动性与威权体制的折冲,如何发展出政治、经济、文化构连的侍从报业。第四种则深入新闻史认识论的核心议题:历史书写的视域限制,检视研究者受限于历史情境所做的书写策略。四种研究取径的重点都在政府与知识分子间的对话,笔者提出另一问题:大众在那里?新闻史研究往往不见庶民的活力,只见知识分子的企图与努力,是否能将阅听人研究整合进新闻史中,寻访历史中消逝阅听人的感觉结构? 相似文献
13.
14.
Mobile journalism is one of the fastest areas of growth in the modern journalism industry. Yet mobile journalists find themselves in a place of tension, between print, broadcast, and digital journalism and between traditional journalism and lifestyle journalism. Using the lens of field theory, the present study conducted an online survey of mobile journalists (N?=?39) from six countries representing four continents on how they conceive of their journalistic role, and how their work is perceived within the newsroom. Participants were journalists in television, print, magazine, and digital local and national newsrooms. The present study sought to understand how mobile journalists see mobile production as a part of their journalistic role, and what field theory dimensions influence mobile production in their newsrooms. While prior research has established a growing prevalence of lifestyle journalism, the present study finds that the growth of mobile journalism represents the development of lifestyle journalism norms, such as content driven by the audience, within even traditional journalism. 相似文献
15.
《Journalism Practice》2013,7(1):48-65
In an increasingly digital world where many are predicting the demise of the traditional newspaper, the media are turning to the masses to report and help report through the power of Internet journalism. Taking their cues from other areas such as photography and science, news organizations are employing the increasingly popular concept of “crowdsourcing” where tasks traditionally performed by employees are outsourced to a large network of people, recruited through an open call. This paper examines five different cases of crowdsourced journalism, classified on the basis of type of coverage and audience demographic. The study explores the strategies employed in each case, analyzes the benefits and pitfalls, and offers suggestions and ideas for future ventures. Observations and insights from journalists in different organizations are used to evaluate how crowdsourcing is blurring the lines between journalists as reporters and citizens as consumers. 相似文献
16.
数字时代的媒介信任——关于中国新闻工作者对网络信息与媒体新闻报道信任度的调查 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
本文从媒介系统依赖理论出发,调查并比较了中国新闻工作者及未来新闻工作者(新闻专业学生)对BBS信息和报纸信息的信任度。结果显示,由网民提供的信息正日益受到信任,这一趋势在学生群体中表现更为明显。 相似文献
17.
Maarit Jaakkola 《Journalism Practice》2015,9(6):811-828
Reflecting a change from high to liquid modern culture, journalism is said to be encountering a transformation from high towards liquid modernity. Cultural journalism, however, has been found to be “journalism with a difference”. Due to this distinctive character, the principles of general journalism do not directly apply to cultural journalism. Consequently, the manifestations and consequences of the high and liquid modern ethos appear differently in cultural journalism. Proposing a theoretical framework of the core aspects of journalism—(1) knowledge, (2) audience, (3) power, (4) time, and (5) ethics—this article argues that cultural journalists differ from other journalists in their responses to the recent transformations in the professional values, working practices and the status of journalists. 相似文献
18.
19.
Heikki Heikkilä 《Journalism Practice》2015,9(1):50-64
The media-saturated nature of everyday life is well acknowledged in current audience research, but the role of journalism for people living in this digitalised environment remains less clear. To provide a better understanding of the role of journalism and news in everyday life, this article states the case for combining two complementary analytical perspectives in cultural audience research that draw on the framework of practice theory. We need to focus on both interpersonal communication practices within social networks and on discursive practices and patterns of how people use the media. Empirically, this article draws on an extensive audience study conducted in Finland, whose findings provide a cause for moderate optimism regarding the sustaining relevance of journalism in people's everyday life in the digital era. Firstly, social networks—both offline and online—constitute a vital structure within which the output of journalism is rendered meaningful by users. Secondly, the discursive practices applied by the participants emphasise the importance of news as a central means of orientation to society and making sense of the political nature of the public world. However, much of this potential remains unknown to journalists because users' activities occur at a distance from journalism and political institutions, which poses a challenge to digital journalism. 相似文献
20.
Anthony Mills 《Journalism Practice》2019,13(6):690-707
If democracy is a platform for many voices, and the voices of the many, journalists serve democracy by bringing these voices to the forefront of governance by asking difficult questions to those in power. It can be argued that journalists engage in the broader form of surveillance of power from below, or sousveillance [Mann, Steve, and Joseph Ferenbok. 2013. “New media and the power politics of sousveillance in a surveillance-dominated world.” Surveillance and Society 11 (1-2): 18–34.], which aims towards a form of relative equilibrium. In democracies, the institutional system of checks and balances forms the basis on which journalism pursues its watchdog function. This paper explores the experiences of journalists with surveillance and their impact on journalists’ sense of freedom to fulfil their watchdog role. The paper contributes to increasing research interest in “journalism after Snowden” by addressing the intangible conditions under which journalists may or should work, and ultimately also how widely accepted standards of democratic liberties are challenged. 相似文献