共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 296 毫秒
1.
2.
编辑如何提高审稿能力 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
一篇稿件能否被期刊录用,稿件审稿质量的优劣及编辑部对文稿的初审往往起到关键的作用.我国学术类和技术类科技期刊的审稿大都采用"三审一定制",即编辑初审、专家评审,主编或编委复审,主编或编委定审. 相似文献
3.
4.
5.
6.
新形势下如何进一步提高企业创办科技期刊的影响力成为期刊从业人员需要面对的问题。《烧结球团》通过采取与高水平科研团队共同办刊、深耕细分领域发布指标集和产业分布图、举办高质量学术会议推动产学研融合等方式来提升期刊学术质量和服务产业能力。结果表明：将编委分为顾问编委、组稿编委、审稿编委和青年编委四大类并细化编委职责后,期刊高质量论文数量大幅增加;采用CiteSpace工具进行文献来源分析,并绘制作者、机构、关键词等网络图谱来分析烧结球团行业特征后,期刊正不断与各学术团体建立稳定的战略合作关系;邀请知名学者开设专刊提升了编委的自主办刊意识;通过发布指标集和产业分布图、搭建行业专家库等手段,期刊不断提升服务产业高质量发展的能力;以培养复合型编辑人才、坚持“内容为王”、不以营利为目的作为办会理念后,历年举办的全国烧结球团学术交流年会的学术水平和参会人数不断提升,该年会已成为全行业技术发展与进步的风向标。这一系列措施实施后,期刊的来稿数量和质量明显提升,期刊综合影响力和学术质量进一步提高。 相似文献
7.
《图书情报工作》杂志社目前出版两本期刊,分别为《图书情报工作》和《知识管理论坛》。为了充分发挥并激励编委的作用,2020年10月,《图书情报工作》杂志社进行了优秀编委的评选,依据编委在过去一年中:为编辑部提供选题策划、组织专题稿件、撰写稿件、为杂志社组织的学术会议及培训做报告、参与稿件评审,以及日常对期刊的宣传情况,由编辑部评选出《图书情报工作》16名优秀编委、12名优秀青年编委和《知识管理论坛》8名优秀编委。 相似文献
8.
大数据时代,充足的数据资源使得定量评价和考核编委职能成为可能。基于来稿学科与编委学科比对分析,以及对编委学术活跃度和年龄结构的量化考核,优化编委会结构组成,并通过制度性建设,动态监管编委会职能发挥情况,可以显著提升编委的主观能动性。实践显示,经过结构优化和制度化建设后的《地球科学》和《Journal of Earth Science》编委会成员,既是作者,又是审稿专家,也是期刊的宣传组稿人员。实现了编辑、编委的优势互补,期刊组约稿能力的显著提高,促进了期刊的良性发展。 相似文献
9.
《图书情报工作》杂志社目前出版两本期刊,分别为《图书情报工作》和《知识管理论坛》。为了充外发挥并激励编委的作用,2020年10月,《图书情报工作》杂志社进行了优秀编委的评选,依据编委在过去一年中:为编辑部提供选题策划、组织专题稿件、撰写稿件、为杂志社组织的学术会议及培训做报告、参与稿件评审,以及日常对期刊的宣传情况,由编辑部评选出《图书情报工作》16名优秀编委、12名优秀青年编委和《知识管理论坛》8名优秀编委。 相似文献
10.
如何加快审稿流程是科技期刊关注的重要问题。而部分学科领域的英文科技期刊在寻找合适的审稿人环节花费的时间较多,已成为制约期刊发展的一个因素。本文提出了“编委编辑协同处理稿件”模式(简称“协同模式”),并结合《Avian Research》的实践,详细介绍了期刊在“协同模式”下,编辑如何在编委工作时间受限的特定时期与编委密切配合,采取便捷方式协助编委快速了解稿件情况、寻找合适的审稿人以加快审稿流程,提升审稿质量,同时指出了“协同模式”下需体现编委学术把关作用、降低拒审率等注意事项,为面临类似问题的期刊提供参考。 相似文献
11.
Seats at the table: The network of the editorial boards in information and library science 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
The structural properties of the network generated by the editorial activities of the members of the boards of “Information Science & Library Science” journals are explored through network analysis techniques. The crossed presence of scholars on editorial boards, the phenomenon called interlocking editorship, is considered a proxy of the similarity of editorial policies. The evidences support the idea that this group of journals is better described as a set of only relatively connected subfields. In particular two main subfields are identified, consisting of research oriented journals devoted respectively to LIS and MIS. The links between these two subsets are weak. Around these two subsets there are a lot of (relatively) isolated professional journals or journals characterized more by their subject-matter content than by their focus on information flows. It is possible to suggest that this configuration of the network may be the consequence of the youthfulness of Information Science & Library Science, which has not permitted yet to reach a general consensus through scholars on research aims, methods and instruments. 相似文献
12.
This paper presents a review of publications that explore the role of editorial boards for scholarly journals. Such studies are rather limited as the role of editorial boards of scientific periodicals has not yet been fully gauged by information experts as a subject of scientometric research. However, the study of the publication activities, as well as the geographic, linguistic, and gender distribution of editorial-board members offers a new perspective on several issues of relevance to scientometrics. Such issues include the assessment of research performance at the country, organizational, or research-group level; research and publication ethics; journal quality; and internationalization of a scientific discipline. 相似文献
13.
Mike Downes 《Learned Publishing》2020,33(3):287-295
A total of 966 allegedly ‘predatory’ open access publishers were examined to determine the nature of their ethical or unethical practices and the extent to which Australian academics were included on the editorial boards of their journals. An estimated 4,000 Australian academics (ca. 7% of the academic population) are on these journal boards. Of the publishers, 240 proved to be overtly fraudulent, the ethical status of the others remaining unresolved. About 86% of the Australian academics identified appeared on the editorial boards of journals belonging to those 240 publishers. Despite two decades of advocacy from librarians, there remains widespread ignorance of the existence of such fraudulent publishers, and more severe action is required. Reform proposals include naming the publisher in all references and in academic profiles and curriculum vitae. Universities are encouraged to take responsibility for publishing journals that replace those currently causing the problem. Institutions are urged to augment their current warnings and advice with formal policies, which will probably require a blacklist of unacceptable publishers. New formal policies for dealing with predatory publishers are currently being developed in some Australian universities. 相似文献
14.
Petr Novotný Karolína Kotvaltová Sezemská Romana Schubertová Vanda Janštová 《Learned Publishing》2023,36(2):194-204
There is evidence that national scientific journals are important for local communities despite their limited audience due to national languages and topics, like in pedagogy. However, it is not easy to assess the level of scientific rigour of local journals, as most do not have available scientometric data and are often published in minority languages. We hypothesize that a possible manifestation of a latent trait of inner authenticity of the scientific journal (meaning the journal is accepted by a community interested in developing the field which conducts internationally accepted research) could be H-index of the editorial board members. To test this approach, we evaluated H-index and gender of editorial board members (n = 490) from 17 Czech and Slovak national science-oriented scientific pedagogical journals which were not indexed or indexed in Erih+ or Scopus, and compared this with the five lowest-rated journals from the same field indexed in the Web of Science (WoS) database. The H-index of editorial board members was somewhat higher in indexed journals with those from WoS showing higher scores, and the number of board members with no discernable H-index was far greater in non-indexed journals. Editorial boards of journals indexed in WoS were mostly male, compared to a dominance of women on boards of non-indexed journals. Acknowledging the limited sample, it appears that the H-index of editorial board members may be a way to value national scientific journals. 相似文献
15.
《Medical reference services quarterly》2013,32(4):27-34
In many health sciences libraries, publishing the newsletter is a function of the Public Services Department. Reference librarians, often without prior training or experience in publishing, are asked to serve on editorial boards or are even designated sole newsletter editor. This paper is intended to provide some practical advice for publishing an inexpensive library newsletter. 相似文献
16.
17.
Irene Hames 《Learned Publishing》2001,14(4):247-256
Most journals have editorial boards. Their composition, what the individual members do, and how they operate will vary, but they are generally recognized as having certain central roles. What makes a good editor? How can potential editors be identified and then persuaded to join an editorial board? Once on the board, what can be done to keep them happy, committed, and working productively for the journal? What sorts of problems can arise, and how can they be avoided? These are some of the questions dealt with in this article. 相似文献
18.
Assessing the scholarly impact of academic institutions has become increasingly important. The achievements of editorial board members can create benchmarks for research excellence and can be used to evaluate both individual and institutional performance. This paper proposes a new method based on journal editor data for assessing an institution’s scholarly impact. In this paper, a journal editorship index (JEI) that simultaneously accounts for the journal rating (JR), editor title (ET), and board size (BS) is constructed. We assess the scholarly impact of economics institutions based on the editorial boards of 211 economics journals (which include 8640 editorial board members) in the ABS Academic Journal Guide. Three indices (JEI/ET, JEI/JR, and JEI/BS) are also used to rank the institutions. It was found that there was only a slight change in the relative institutional rankings using the JEI/ET and JEI/BS compared to the JEI. The BS and ET weight factors did not have a substantial influence on the ranking of institutions. It was also found that the journal rating weight factor had a large effect on the ranking of institutions. This paper presents an alternative approach to using editorial board memberships as the basis for assessing the scholarly impact of economics institutions. 相似文献
19.
