共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 140 毫秒
1.
Elsevier Science期刊网络审稿系统的使用与启示 总被引：6，自引：4，他引：6
Elsevier Science期刊Journal of Alloys andCompounds的编辑Prof.Hiroki Sakaguchi近期通过E-mail与笔者联系一篇稿件的审阅事宜。在了解了待审稿件内容的基础上,笔者E-mail回复可以审理该稿件。责任编辑在得到确认审稿的信息后,通知笔者按要求登录审稿系统的用户名和密码,并告知审稿辅助工具的使用方法和应得到的报酬。笔者按要求登录了审稿系统,并上传审稿意见,完成审稿。整个过程全部是在网上远程操作完成的。本文就使用该系统过程中发现的可借鉴之处进行了总结,以期为我国科技期刊网络审稿系统的研发和完善提供帮助。1通知审稿专家… 相似文献
2.
3.
科技期刊的审稿工作（Ⅰ）—期刊的编辑审稿 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
审稿工作是科技期刊编辑工作的重要组成部分，编辑审稿有其特殊性，审稿质量的优劣，直接影响科技期刊的质量，进而影响科技期刊的发展，从编辑的角度提出了编辑审稿的内容，应遵循的基本原则，掌握的尺度以及编辑在审稿过程中应注意的有关事项和必须承担的相应责任。 相似文献
4.
科技期刊在线审稿系统应用中的问题及对策 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
为缩短审稿时间,降低出版时滞,许多科技期刊编辑部相继建立了在线审稿系统.分析科技期刊在线审稿系统应用中存在的问题,并提出对策. 相似文献
5.
国外科技期刊审稿的一些特点 总被引：21，自引：12，他引：9
审稿质量的高低直接影响科技期刊的学术质量和学术发展.目前国内外的科技期刊在审稿环节上存在较大的差别,主要体现在稿件的同行评议、专家审阅、审稿重点、重复审稿、审稿时间和网络应用等方面. 相似文献
6.
7.
科技期刊半月刊建立快速通道审稿制探析 总被引：6，自引：1，他引：6
科技期刊半月刊存在审稿速度问题.从快速初审、快速复审和快速终审等几个方面论述科技期刊半月刊建立快速通道审稿制的必要性、方法和注意事项,以期为办科技期刊半月刊提供一些参考. 相似文献
8.
科技期刊稿件遴选机制研究 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
分析科技期刊稿件三审制中专家评审环节采用匿名审稿模式和公开审稿模式的利弊,以及编委推荐制对于科技期刊遴选优质稿件的突出优势.认为我国科技期刊在公开审稿模式尚未建立的现阶段,实行编委推荐制与同行专家双向匿名审稿模式相结合的综合稿件遴选机制是一种合理的选择. 相似文献
9.
10.
11.
科技期刊稿约应包含的著作权条款 总被引：12，自引：6，他引：6
为了有效地预防和减少著作权纠纷，科技期刊稿约应明确规定科技期刊与作者的权利和义务。它主要包括文责自负、作品署名、稿件修改、录用答复期限、参考或引用、抄袭或剽窃、转载或摘编、稿酬、审稿费和发表费等方面的内容。 相似文献
12.
我国医学期刊消息栏目存在问题浅析 总被引：2，自引：1，他引：1
抽查了1999年出版的14种国内医学期刊消息目的有关情况，发现1种期刊无消息栏目，13种有消息栏目的期刊111期共刊登316条消息，其中41．1％为征文通知，21．9％为征订通知，8．2％为出版信息，7．6％为学习班通知，6．0％为会讯，其他占15．2％，这表明国内许我医学期刊的消息栏目存在内容局限等问题，有待改进，对办好消息栏提出了建议。 相似文献
13.
《Journal Of Access Services》2013,10(3-4):83-92
ABSTRACT The prompt return of checked out materials has been demanded by libraries for more than a century. Together with other measures such as overdue fines, library notices are used to bring in prompt returns by informing the users of their checked out items that will soon be due or are already overdue. The analysis of library notices sent in the past five years indicates courtesy notices that alert users of their soon-to-be-due items fail to improve prompt return significantly. On the other hand, sustaining the library notice service takes effort and cost. In this age of technology, prompt return may perhaps be viewed in a new perspective that serves the users and the library better. 相似文献
14.
During the past twenty years, more than ninety retraction notices have been published in biomedical journals. These retractions constitute a unique body of literature that biomedical researchers, bibliographers, and librarians must monitor to reduce scientific use of retracted, invalid papers. An analysis of medical retraction notices shows that very few are prominent in style, format, or placement, in spite of authoritative publication standards formulated by the International Council of Medical Journal Editors. Although researchers are ultimately responsible for the validity of the information they cite in their own publications, biomedical librarians are in a unique position to educate their patrons regarding retracted papers. 相似文献
15.
《Library & information science research》2004,26(1):73-93
A survey of academic reference librarians provided data for an examination of differences in survey administration on paper and the World Wide Web, with particular attention to response rates, response time/quickness, sampling bias, and differences in responses that are related to the medium of administration. Three methods of survey distribution were compared: paper survey distributed by mail, Web survey announced by mail, and Web survey announced by e-mail. Response rates for the Web survey were not as high as with traditional survey methods. Responses to the Web survey were returned more quickly, but not by a great deal. E-mail notices were more effective for promoting the Web survey than paper notices. The study detected no sampling bias or differences in the content of responses. Although the advantages of Web survey administration are alluring, researchers must use carefully designed follow-up procedures and avoid technology-related implementation problems to match the effectiveness of traditional paper surveys. 相似文献
16.
NLM's practices for handling errata and retractions 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
The keystone of the scientific method is solid experimental design and reproducible results. The publishing of findings advances knowledge and establishes the basis for further research. In recent years, the foundations of this principle have been shaken as a small, but significant portion of the scientific literature is being flawed by the appearance of fraudulently produced research. Potentially as damaging are errors that result from poor editing and proofreading. Fraudulent articles and errors lead, at best, to misunderstandings and, at worst, to dire consequences in the treatment of patients. Errata and retraction notices are generally carried in the published literature but usually are not linked to the original data. Database producers, such as NLM, have the means to establish this link and to inform users of incorrect information in the source documents as well. This paper reports NLM's experience in bringing published retraction and errata notices to the public's attention and relates this experience to the library's overall interest in quality assurance. 相似文献
17.
Quan‐Hoang Vuong 《Learned Publishing》2020,33(2):119-130
While researchers with retracted papers – publications that are withdrawn because of significant errors or scientific misconduct – carry a permanent stain on their publishing records, understanding the causes and initiators of such retractions can shed a different light on the matter. This paper, based on a random sample of 2,046 retracted papers, which were published between 1975 and 2019, extracted from Retraction Watch and the websites of major publishers, shows that 53% of the retraction notices do not specify who initiated the retraction. Nearly 10% of the retraction notes either omit or do not contain information related to reasons for retractions. Furthermore, most of the retracted papers in our sample have no limitation section; those who do are commonly unhelpful or irrelevant. The results carry three implications for scientific transparency: retraction notices need to be more informative; limitation sections ought to be a required and even an open section of all published articles; and finally, promoting ‘heroic acts’ in science can positively change the current publishing culture. 相似文献
18.
This article charts the emergence of the births, deaths and marriages column in the colonial Australian press. Using Australia’s oldest continuing newspaper the Sydney Morning Herald as a case study, this article examines the evolution of the notices over a 25-year period from the newspaper’s first publication (as the Sydney Herald) in 1831. We argue that the births, deaths and marriages notices in the Herald were part of early attempts by colonists to reinforce their respectability before becoming a practice with widespread appeal that both announced key life events and marked people’s connection to place. Drawing on the scholarship of Pierre Bourdieu, our analysis pinpoints the moment these notices were ‘legitimised’ by the journalistic field and marked the birth of a media ritual in colonial Australian society. We provide historical insight into the ways in which the news media establish legitimacy in the social spaces they serve. 相似文献
19.
Dario Sambunjak 《Learned Publishing》2006,19(4):267-271
To increase its visibility among the general public and the international scientific community, the Croatian Medical Journal (CMJ), a small journal from the so‐called scientific periphery, introduced a media strategy of sending press releases to journalists and email notices to the newsdesk of a high‐profile international scientific journal. Subsequent news coverage and the positive response of journalists show that press releases and targeted email notices increased international visibility of articles published in a small scientific journal, and improved communication with journalists as mediators of scientific information to the general public. 相似文献
20.
同行评议与文献计量在科研评价中的作用分析比较 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
[目的/意义] 科研评价实践中普遍使用的两种评价手段和量度工具是同行评议与计量为基础的评价（文献计量、经济计量甚至替代计量）。为了对比同行评议质量判断与计量为基础的评价结果的一致性,进而回答同行评议能否被新兴的计量评价方法取代。[方法/过程] 本文采用非实证的研究方式,收集前人在论文发表、项目资助、研发评价实践、个人颁奖以及Altmetrics计量评价领域应用两种评价方法对研发绩效测度的120多篇实证研究进行元分析并汇总成定量化综述,基于认知演化的视角进行系统记叙。[结果/结论] 传统同行评议为基础的决策判断始终是研发评价的首要量度工具且地位无法取代,它与引用为基础的计量评价结果在统计上仅存在适度的正相关性,Spearman秩相关系数r∈[0.24,0.88],地位上后者更应充当前者的补充而非替代,即建构在定量辅助基础上的知情同行评议模式不仅使评价结果更加客观透明,也添加额外的附加价值,通过数据来加深对问题的认识,为评价的黄金法则。 相似文献