首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到19条相似文献,搜索用时 312 毫秒
1.
中外科技期刊英文目次编排形式的调查及分析   总被引:1,自引:1,他引:0  
调查了国内外49种自然科学版学术期刊,其英文目次的编排格式多达22种,主要表现在英文题名大小写、字体和作者姓名编排格式的差异.特别是国内科技期刊英文目次编排形式较多,占了17种,国外期刊英文目次编排形式有5种.在分析了国内外科技期刊英文目次编排形式的基础上,推荐了美国现代语言协会(MLA)关于科技期刊英文目次的编排规范.  相似文献   

2.
对2013年出版的120种农业及医学期刊中名词英文注释的表达形式进行了调查,发现不规范现象比较严重。通过原因分析提出正确表达的建议,以期引起作者和编辑的重视。  相似文献   

3.
科技期刊论文基金项目表达形式的规范化   总被引:9,自引:3,他引:6  
为了探讨我国科技期刊基金项目表达形式的规范化和标准化问题,随机选取100种中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)的刊源期刊,对其论文基金项目的表达形式进行调查,结果是其表达形式比较混乱.通过分析提出了有关建议.  相似文献   

4.
文章以期刊英文编辑的视角,剖析在日常医学论文稿件英文题名、署名和英文摘要编辑中遇到的问题,希望为医学论文撰写者矫正写作中可能存在的错误观念,进而为进行正确的英文摘要写作提供一些帮助.  相似文献   

5.
介绍英译医学期刊论文英文题名和摘要应注意的几个问题,即:题名如何体现文章重点,副题名的表达。语言表达的差异,避免滥用缩写词和结构式摘要的标题,时态的用法,标点符号的用法,人称的用法和句子表达的规范性等。探讨英文题名和摘要的规范化处理。  相似文献   

6.
生物学论文英文题名的编辑加工   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
杜丽  尚伟芬 《编辑学报》2014,26(6):545-547
论文题名是科技论文的总纲,而英文题名更是论文面对国际同行的窗口。本文结合《中国生物化学与分子生物学报》2013年部分论文英文题名的审改实例,总结生物学论文英文题名编辑加工中要注意的原则:准确、简洁和规范。同时探讨对英文题名进行文字加工时的注意事项。  相似文献   

7.
陈征  张昕 《编辑学报》2016,28(3):217-219
近年来,科技期刊界出现了对中文科技期刊和英文科技期刊不协同发展的质疑.文章分析了深层次原因,阐释了在”互联网+”时代两者协同发展对创新型国家建设的重要意义.并提出了对策:两者要结合各自定位做好长远规划:鼓励中文科技期刊出版机构创办英文科技期刊;建立双语科技期刊数据库,依托其探索中英文科技期刊共同评价的体系;进一步提高中文科技期刊在国际的显示度;提高英文科技期刊在国内的显示度;建立中文和英文科技期刊的沟通机制,组织高水平的交流、培训活动.  相似文献   

8.
论述科技论文英文题名在科技信息传播中的重要作用;提出了英文题名编辑加工的程序及其目标.讨论英文题名编辑加工中的若干具体问题,如主副题名、系列题名,以及题名中的字母大小写、缩略语及介词等问题.  相似文献   

9.
科技学术论文英文题名与摘要等的译写   总被引:16,自引:1,他引:15  
针对科技论文英文摘要译写中的常见错误和各种不规范情况,以国标GB6774-86为依据,参阅大量英文期刊,探索英文摘要的译写规范,提出英文摘要应与中文摘要相对应,分别从英文题名、作者姓名及其工作单位名英译、英文摘要主要内容和英文关键词等方面论述了英文简要的译与规范。  相似文献   

10.
阐述科技期刊学术论文文后参考文献中"题名"这一关键信息要素的判定、引导和检索的功能,强调应当重视文后参考文献"题名"的著录.认为国内知名期刊须更加注重文献题名的规范标注,充分发挥在同行期刊中的示范和引导作用,不应单纯以符合"国际惯例"为由而采取省略题名的做法.  相似文献   

11.
科技期刊文后参考文献英文刊名著录问题   总被引:2,自引:2,他引:0  
张铁明  颜帅  程朋军 《编辑学报》2009,21(5):461-462
随机选取2007-2008年出版的100种国内科技期刊,统计其文后参考文献中英文文献的刊名著录形式,发现存在著录形式混乱、刊名缩写不规范等现象.分析问题产生的原因,并提出相应的对策和建议.  相似文献   

12.
13.
In this paper we map the scientific journals from Ibero‐American countries indexed in the Web of Science and Scopus. Data were collected from the journals' websites. Of 879 journals in the two databases, Spain accounted for 35.6% of the titles, Brazil 28.5%, and the remaining 11 countries together 35.9%. Medicine had the most titles in almost all countries, with 28.9% of the total, followed by agricultural and biological sciences (particularly in Brazil) with 14.9%, and social sciences with 11.5%. A digital format was used by 95% of the journals and 82% were open access, with an even higher level of open access in Latin America. The publishers were mainly universities (37.7%) and associations (31.1%). Ibero‐American countries, with the exception of Spain, do not have a long tradition as scientific journal publishers, but in the last few years they have gained in importance as players in scientific communication with the use of new business models for journals.  相似文献   

14.
The main criterion for selecting journals for indexing in Index Medicus, and thereby largely in MEDLARS, is quality. Subject scope varies with the voiced needs of the biomedical community. The Index aims to cover the best journals in all relevant subject fields, but the percentage of journals on a subject indexed depends on the quality of each journal. Country and language coverage depends on quality, even in the case of the best journals of each, although American biases may affect such selection. While a number of guidelines exist for identifying quality journals, information necessary to apply them confidently is often difficult to obtain. The National Library of Medicine is advised by an Ad Hoc Panel on the Selection of Journals for Index Medicus, composed both of NLM officers and extramural members. Criticism has been voiced that too many titles are indexed, compared with titles actually used, but no meaningful statistics of use exist which can identify titles which should be excluded from indexing. Continuing suggestions from users regarding titles indexed would benefit everyone.  相似文献   

15.
[目的/意义]近年来,热点论文逐渐受到学术界重视,为数不多的研究成果已开始探索热点论文自身的特征,但在影响因素等规律方面的研究工作尚不充分。[方法/过程]本研究利用TF-IDF算法和负二项回归模型,试图探究热点论文的分布特征、影响因素、时间窗口差异和学科类型差异。[结果/结论]研究结果表明,热点论文的分布特征侧重于发达国家、知名研究机构、交叉学科和权威期刊;并且受到精炼的标题、国家间合作、研究型产出、开放获取、高影响因子期刊等因素影响;热点论文存在时间窗口效应,甚至改变了标题、摘要、开放获取等因素影响热点论文的具体轨迹;学科间差异对热点论文具有影响,在标题、摘要、科研合作、文献类型、开放获取、期刊影响因子方面均存在差异。  相似文献   

16.
陈静 《编辑学报》2013,25(2):156-158
针对地方院校理科学报稿源萎缩的现实,从论文写作难度、非法期刊分流、职称评审导向、审稿标准提高、检索系统介入等10个方面探究分析其原因,并提出6种可资学报工作者参考借鉴的解决之策。  相似文献   

17.
This study in an academic medical sciences library setting examines the correlation of usage of a matched set of print and online titles, the validity of e-journals usage statistics and the impact of online journals on print journal usage. The print and online usage was determined for 270 journals, both versions of which were available. Print usage was determined annually since 1997 using the reshelving and the error-copies method. Online usage statistics were delivered by five publishers and corrected for redundant multiple accesses. Print journal usage decreased by 22.3 and 30.2% respectively over each of 2 years after the introduction of online journals. Journals published both in print and online lost 30.4% of their print usage within 2 years. The total loss of usage of print-only titles in the same period was somewhat higher, at 45.8%. The average correlation between online and print usage is 0.60 and 0.67 respectively. For the examined titles, users accessed the online versions ten times as often as the print version. Two clearly distinguishable groupings emerged: while with Academic Press and Elsevier, e-journal usage exceeded print usage by a factor of 3 or 4, the e-journals of Blackwell, HighWire and Springer were used on average 14.6 times as frequently as the corresponding print journals. Each usage of a print article cost 2.79-50.82 Euro, each usage of an online article 0.31-15.10 Euro, depending on the publisher. On average, the usage of an online article was 5.4 times cheaper. Within 2-3 years the usage of online journals has outstripped that of print titles by a factor of ten, but the specific spectrum of usage remains much the same as when only print journals alone existed. Print titles not available online suffer a greater decline in usage compared with print/online journals. This confirms that what is read or purchased is determined primarily by ease of access and that there is a steady tendency to reduce the multiplicity of access modes to a manageable few. The availability of journals online seems to have created a new clientele, at least in the case of the German-language Springer journals. The connection between supplier and supply is much less clear with e-journals than it is with print titles. Therefore it is very important to stress and encourage the role of the library as the supplier of this sort of information in the university environment. Collection building issues are discussed in the light of the results.  相似文献   

18.
The major purpose of this study was to identify and assess indexing coverage of core journals in cytotechnology. It was part of a larger project sponsored by the Nursing and Allied Health Resources Section of the Medical Library Association to map the literature of allied health. Three representative journals in cytotechnology were selected and subjected to citation analysis to determine what journals, other publication types, and years were cited and how often. Bradford's Law of Scattering was applied to the resulting list of cited journals to identify core titles in the discipline, and five indexes were searched to assess coverage of these core titles. Results indicated that the cytotechnology journal literature had a small core but wide dispersion: one third of the 21,021 journal citations appeared in only 3 titles; another third appeared in an additional 26 titles; the remaining third were scattered in 1,069 different titles. Science Citation Index Expanded rated highest in indexing coverage of the core titles, followed by MEDLINE, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, HealthSTAR, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL). The study's results also showed that journals were the predominantly cited format and that citing authors relied strongly on more recent literature.  相似文献   

19.
《期刊图书馆员》2012,62(1-4):79-86
The Pennsylvania Academic Library Consortium (PALCI) has developed a shared print archive, an archive that promises to maintain rarely used print journals from noted scientific society publishers for a ten year period. The goals for this collaborative project are to ensure access to commonly held print journal titles, to allow libraries to withdraw materials so they may re-purpose valuable space, and to share the responsibility of storing print titles at individual institutions instead of requiring a centralized storage facility. This paper discusses the grassroots origins for this project and the process decisions involved in turning the archive from vision into reality.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号