共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
Terry Cook 《Archival Science》2001,1(1):3-24
Process rather than product, becoming rather than being, dynamic rather than static, context rather than text, reflecting
time and place rather than universal absolutes—these have become the postmodern watchwords for analyzing and understanding
science, society, organizations, and business activity, among others. They should likewise become the watchwords for archival
science in the new century, and thus the foundation for a new conceptual paradigm for the profession. Postmodernism is not
the only reason for reformulating the main precepts of archival science. Significant changes in the purpose of archives as
institutions and the nature of records are other factors which, combined with postmodern insights, form the basis of the new
perception of archives as documents, institutions, and profession in society.
This essay explores the nature of postmodernism and archival science, and suggest links between the two. It outlines two broad
changes in archival thinking that underpin the archival paradigm shift, before suggesting new formulations for most traditional
archival concepts. 相似文献
2.
Håkan Lövblad 《Archival Science》2003,3(2):131-155
The contextual approach gives the impression that we are moving into the 21st century with three competing scientific traditions
of interpretation. Another understanding is the systemic view, which indicates a paradigm with complementing traditions of
interpretation, depending on ontological level. The paradigm of archival science is, like that of many other sciences, influenced
by positivism, systems theory and hermeneutics. The relevance of the paradigm depends on personal beliefs. The hermeneutic
understanding of archival science emphasizes the context and deconstructs central concepts. Hermeneutics emphasizes the influence
of conceptual changes and technological advances on perception. Hermeneutics stresses the need for a socio-cultural and historical
orientation of archival science. The positivistic tradition is coloured by the myths about an ideal science. This is reflected
firstly in the analogy comparing archives with nature, and secondly in the deductive method. Positivism is instrumental in
its demands for distinct definitions of concepts and its insistence on the record as the basis of archival science. The flexibility
of systems theory highlights the complex relations between context and record. Systems theory can, at its best, serve as a
meeting-place for researchers, archivists and users and accordingly form the basis for new knowledge and theory formation.
Systems theory enables a materialistic/dialectic epistemology based in reality and inspired by other relevant sciences. The
result may be the foundation of a systemic-functionalist archival science with activities, records creation and evidential
values in focus. 相似文献
3.
Terry Cook 《Archival Science》1987,1(1):3-24
Process rather than product, becoming rather than being, dynamicrather than static, context rather than text, reflecting time andplace rather than universal absolutes – these have become thepostmodern watchwords for analyzing and understanding science,society, organizations, and business activity, among others. Theyshould likewise become the watchwords for archival science in thenew century, and thus the foundation for a new conceptual paradigmfor the profession. Postmodernism is not the only reason for reformulatingthe main precepts of archival science. Significant changes in thepurpose of archives as institutions and the nature of records areother factors which, combined with postmodern insights, form thebasis of the new perception of archives as documents, institutions,and profession in society.This essay explores the nature of postmodernism and archival science,and suggest links between the two. It outlines two broad changes inarchival thinking that underpin the archival paradigm shift, beforesuggesting new formulations for most traditional archival concepts. 相似文献
4.
Livia Iacovino 《Archival Science》2004,4(3-4):267-286
This article describes the issues involved in using a multi-method approach to address multi-faceted interdisciplinary research
in archival science. The example chosen to illustrate the multi-method approach is taken from recent research, which explored
the recordkeeping-ethics-law nexus from the perspective of communities as social systems, regulatory models for recordkeeping
and their continuing application to online records. The methods combined traditional archival and social science research
techniques, as well as legal and ethics research tools drawn from law and moral philosophy, together with disciplinary discourse
analysis, concept mapping and empirical examples to illustrate the concepts. The example demonstrates that complex research
questions that cross disciplinary boundaries need to draw from a number of research paradigms and conceptual understandings,
which assist in breaking down the barriers with knowledge domains that have to date, had limited contact with archival science. 相似文献
5.
6.
7.
8.
A first introduction to archival science 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
Theo Thomassen 《Archival Science》2001,1(4):373-385
This first introduction, written for educational purposes, is meant to be a concise basic text in which the core concepts
of archival science are coherently defined and explained, in a non-polemical way and departing from a de-institutionalised
point of view. It is not intended to support or reject any single theory, but to provide an overview. It should be read as
a synthesis of a variety of shared ideas and views, not as a manifesto of a new approach to archival science. If there is
anything new to it, it might be located in the coherent and integrated presentation. In this primer of archival science annotation
has been avoided.
The first of several versions of this First Introduction was written in August 1995. It was meant to meet the need of the
Netherlands Archiefschool for a basic text on archival science which could support its different programs for archival education
and training. After ample discussion with the archival science teachers of the Archiefschool, it was introduced in the 1995/1996
courses. From then on, it has been used in almost all courses and classes on archival science on the undergraduate, graduate
and postgraduate levels and in several training and retraining programs of the Archiefschool. The design of the first version
has been maintained in all subsequent versions, including this last one. Still, the text has frequently been adapted as a
result of discussions with students and colleagues, in and outside the school. This first English version can almost be deemed
as a collective product. Of the numerous colleagues who were engaged in this discussion and contributed to the text, special
mention has to be made of Peter Horsman, Hans Scheurkogel, Hans Hofman, Eric Ketelaar, Herman Coppens and Kent Hayworth, who
commented the English version. For the final text and all imperfections that may still cling to it I am, of course, responsible.
An earlier version in Dutch has been published as: Theo thomassen, “Een korte introductie in de archivistiek”, in: P.J. Horsman,
F.C.J. Ketelaar en T.H.P.M. Thomassen (red.),Naar een nieuw paradigma in de archivistiek ('s-Gravenhage, 1999), pp. 11–20. 相似文献
9.
针对中国档案界（包括学界和业界）近年来就档案学专业的英文概念record(s)应如何与中文概念相对应的讨论以及在讨论中所凸显的问题,本研究选择了中美两国政府颁布的相关法律法规为数据源并对所选数据进行了逐字逐句式内容分析。分析过程导引出两类成果,一类以直接的形式呈现了中文概念“文件”、“档案”、“公文”与英文概念record(s)、archives、document(s) 之间相关或无关的关系;而另一类则以间接的方式揭示出中美两国法律法规中皆缺乏完整的、兼具逻辑性和系统性的概念体系。作为第一部分,本文汇报该研究的研究背景、研究方法、研究数据选择以及研究所揭示的中国部分核心概念关系。 相似文献
10.
与现代信息技术的深度融合是档案学科发展的趋势与动力,对信息技术的认知及应用能力是档案学研究生必备的素质。但认知不能仅限于对宏观概念的泛泛感知,也不能过分强调对技术细节的精通,而是基于档案学研究与创新的需求,按照一定的层次培养学生对技术原理的理解与辩证分析能力,以及对技术的作用、应用条件、实施工具的认知能力。 相似文献
11.
档案规范控制是档案知识管理的重要内容,关系到档案资源体系与利用体系等的建设。本文分别从档案专业视角与概念逻辑视角解析了档案规范控制的概念,并分析了档案规范记录嵌入集成式与专门独立式检索系统典型应用案例,最终为我国档案规范控制的标准化及其标准体系构建提出了多项建议,如包括：构建我国档案规范记录概念模型;制定我国档案规范记录需求规范;制定我国档案规范记录著录规则;制定我国档案规范记录编码标准,加强规范记录的共享,并推进档案规范记录的本体应用等。 相似文献
12.
[目的/意义]构建数字时代档案学专业研究生培养的新模式，有利于优化档案学专业研究生的培养理念、途径、方式和方法，从而增强档案学专业研究生在数字时代的竞争力，更好满足国家档案事业在数字时代的建设与发展需要。[方法/过程]分析数字时代档案工作的新变化及其档案学专业研究生教育面临的新环境和新问题；从思想理念、体制机制和过程方式层面，探讨数字时代档案学专业研究生培养模式的构建及优化。[结果/结论]提出基于数字时代的档案学专业研究生培养模式创新路径，包括更新培养目标、调整培养方向、优化知识结构和创新培养方式。 相似文献
13.
开展档案数据治理研究与实践是国家治理现代化和信息资源数据化双重背景下的发展需求,从学理层面分析档案数据治理研究的现状与发展,对于档案数据治理实践和档案学理论构建都具有重要意义。论文对我国现有的档案数据治理相关研究文献进行内容分析,梳理并阐释了现有研究对于档案数据治理概念范畴、内容结构和功能定位的理解。在此基础上,提出档案数据治理研究的理论坐标应当是对档案信息治理理论的转型,对档案数据管理理论体系的深化,以及对档案管理理论的外部拓展。 相似文献
14.
Luciana Duranti 《Archival Science》1987,1(1):39-55
Archival science is to be regarded as a system. The properties of that system can be investigated and integrated. The methodology
to do so has been tested in two research projects which are presented in this article as examples of the way in which the
view of archival science as a system supports the development of new knowledge and as a demonstration of the stability of
archival theory.
This article presupposes that the archival discipline is also a “science”. Many have argued against the idea on the basis
of a common perception that a science is a type of study entirely objective by virtue of the rigorous manner in which it is
carried out and the restricted range of topics to which it applies. In fact, the activity of science is based upon a complex
framework of assumptions that make it possible for the landscape of the scientific endeavour to be redrawn over time, and,
while striving towards objectivity, considers it to be an unattainable ideal. 相似文献
15.
Luciana Duranti 《Archival Science》2001,1(1):39-55
Archival science is to be regarded as a system. The properties of that system can be investigated and integrated. The methodology
to do so has been tested in two research projects which are presented in this article as examples of the way in which the
view of archival science as a system supports the development of new knowledge and as a demonstration of the stability of
archival theory.
This article presupposes that the archival discipline is also a “science”. Many have argued against the idea on the basis
of a common perception that a science is a type of study entirely objective by virtue of the rigorous manner in which it is
carried out and the restricted range of topics to which it applies. In fact, the activity of science is based upon a complex
framework of assumptions that make it possible for the landscape of the scientific endeavour to be redrawn over time, and,
while striving towards objectivity, considers it to be an unattainable ideal. 相似文献
16.
本文对计算档案学概念基础和实践案例的探索,旨在发现在新文科建设背景下,该研究领域的发展进程和空间。通过梳理计算档案学的已有成果,于理论层面明确其跨学科属性、学科融合的基本内容以及计算科学贡献于该领域的核心要义;于实践层面发现计算档案学的应用表现：跨学科属性驱动异质主体协同参与、数据化情境赋予多元泛在对象、融合计算思维再造档案管理活动。由此,对计算档案学的建构空间提出展望：对接新文科明晰发展方向、顺应数据化趋势夯实概念基础、融合多学科要义拓展内容体系。 相似文献
17.
Theo Thomassen 《Archival Science》1987,1(4):373-385
This first introduction, written for educational purposes, is meant to be a concise basic text in which the core concepts of archival science are coherently defined and explained, in a non-polemical way and departing from a de-institutionalised point of view. It is not intended to support or reject any single theory, but to provide an overview. It should be read as a synthesis of a variety of shared ideas and views, not as a manifesto of a new approach to archival science. If there is anything new to it, it might be located in the coherent and integrated presentation. In this primer of archival science annotation has been avoided.This revised version was published online in October 2005 with corrections to the Cover Date. 相似文献
18.
运用“遥读”和“细读”相结合的方法,对2021年《档案学研究》和《档案学通讯》所刊发的220篇学术论文进行研究力量布局与研究主题分布分析,发现高等院校仍是档案学研究的主体力量,但国家档案局的研究力量突显。2021年中国档案学研究主要关注“档案治理”“档案学基础理论”“电子文件管理”“中国古文书学”“档案与数字人文”“档案资源服务”“档案教育”等主题,并呈现出较强的本土性和跨学科性。未来中国档案学研究仍应加强本土化研究,构建具有中国特色的档案学理论体系;要关注“人”的需求,体现档案学研究的人文主义;需关注跨学科问题,实现档案学与其他学科之间理论与方法的双向互动。 相似文献
19.
This paper reviews the archival process at the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR), a repository
of digital social science data, and maps ICPSR’s Ingest and Access operations to the Open Archival Information System (OAIS)
Reference Model. The paper also assesses ICPSR’s conformance with the archival responsibilities of “trusted” OAIS repositories,
with the proviso that audit criteria for archival certification are still under development. The ICPSR to OAIS mapping exercise
has benefits for the larger social science archiving community because it provides an interpretation of the reference model
in the quantitative social science environment and points to preservation-related issues that may be salient for other social
science archives. Building on the archives’ long tradition of shared norms and cooperation, we may ultimately be able to design
a federated system of trusted social science repositories that provides access to the global heritage.
相似文献
| Cole WhitemanEmail: |
20.
Helen R. Tibbo 《Archival Science》2006,6(2):231-245
Archivists in North America have described, discussed, and debated the necessary and optimal content, configuration, and venue
for archival education for close to a century but have given little consideration to integrating technology within archival
curricula. Increasingly, archivists are faced with a high tech world in which they must understand issues including information
systems, the nature of electronic records and databases, record migration, digitization, and web design and creation for provision
of access. This paper explores the nature and extent of information technology and information science coursework and knowledge
discussed in the Society of American Archivists’ Guidelines for a Graduate Program in Archival Studies and that students have
available to them while in archival programs. It concludes with a proposal for Library and Information Science education programs
that prepare archivists to explore developing Certificate of Advanced Studies programs in archival management on top of master’s
degrees to allow for additional information science coursework. 相似文献