“互联网+”背景下学前儿童家长成长教育课程资源的建设现状与改善策略探讨     

黄淑芬 《清远职业技术学院学报》2022,(1)

0-6岁学前儿童家长学习意愿强,手机操作和互联网使用熟练,建设科学合理系统的学前儿童家长成长课程资源将有利于提升家庭教育质量。结合互联网+平台数据分析可知,现有的0-6岁学前儿童家长互联网成长平台多为企业搭建,以盈利为主要目的,提供优质用户体验为特色,但教育课程资源呈现不专业、不系统,公益性不足,成长性不够的特点。建议政府和教育部门应加强家长成长教育课程资源平台的质量和迭代的监控,加强优质国外家庭教育资源的译介,加强企业和非企业优势互补的合作,加强关注家长自身成长的教育课程资源建设。  相似文献   

数字资源整合目标与模式探讨   总被引：19，自引：1，他引：19  

许萍华  丁申桃 《图书馆杂志》2005,24(5):32-34,38

本文以当前数字资源整合的背景为起点，分析国内外数字资源整合的现状，提出了四种资源整合的模式，并提出了资源整合所要达到的最终目标。  相似文献   

与学习进阶相适宜的科学探究课程方案述评     

魏昕  郭玉英 《课程.教材.教法》2018,(3):139-143

美国的科学探究课程IQWST提供了把科学探究学习进阶理论转化到教学实践的有效方式。其开发理念为:依据学习进阶框架确定课程目标,以"驱动问题"为线索设计、组织课程内容,强调科学知识和科学实践能力共同进阶。这启发我们在落实以"核心素养"为目标的课程改革中要注重知识的部分与整体的联系,课程中合理设置科学实践活动,做好科学探究课程与传统课程的结合。  相似文献   

基于OBE理念,构建通识教育课程教学与评估体系——以清华大学为例     

苏芃  李曼丽 《高等工程教育研究》2018,(2):129-135

国内高校积极探索实现通识教育的路径已有多年,但其效果在一定程度上仍然受到质疑。课程是实现通识教育的主要载体,清华大学在探索构建通识教育课程体系过程中,尝试性地采用了工科教育中广泛使用的成效基准教育理念与能力导向课程设计来分析当前我国大学通识教育的课程建设,指出通识教育众课程与通识教育目标之间欠缺逻辑对应的普遍性问题。本文重点介绍了清华大学通识教育课程建设中的困惑和设想,探讨了如何锚定与对应课程与能力目标之间的逻辑关系。本文建议高校在通识教育初建阶段将引入OBE框架以及能力导向课程设计理念可作为一种选择,此举有助于厘清大学通识教育在本科教育中的定位与通识课程之间的逻辑和结构关系。  相似文献   

新课改背景下教师权威的消解与重构     

白雪杰 《沙洋师范高等专科学校学报》2006,7(6):85-87

随着新课程改革的不断推进，教师权威受到严峻的挑战。教师权威的存在是客观且有其合理性的。新课程消解了教师的知识权威、传统权威和法定权威。重建教师权威，需要从转换教师角色、改善知能结构、完善人格等几个方面着手。  相似文献   

Suggestions for the "Integration in Multiple Certificates" Curriculum System Construction     

赵平 《海外英语》2014,(14)

Business English professional "Integration in Multiple Certificates" refers to these two kinds of certificates——a diploma and vocational certificates. Business English curriculum design unified vocational qualification certificate with professional training objectives. Basis on the meeting of requirements of certificates for graduation, making professional training contents, curriculum,teaching methods together with vocational training and the requirements of professional qualification certificates.  相似文献   

Finding the common ground: Teachers' and employers' representations of English in an assessment context          下载免费PDF全文

Simon Child  Martin Johnson  Sanjana Mehta  Annabel Charles 《English in Education》2015,49(2):150-166

There has been a long‐standing debate about how ‘English’ can be defined. Educational policy changes have typically been driven by differing representations of the subject, and have ranged from broad ‘aesthetic’ definitions to more narrow ‘functional’ views. The present study aims to analyse areas of consensus and contention in stakeholders' discourse regarding English. A questionnaire‐based survey and focus groups were used to explore how teachers and employers viewed English as a subject. Their views were conceptualised into three themes: the importance of functional English; English as atomistic versus holistic study; and English as critical thought. These themes are discussed in relation to historical definitions of ‘English’, and their implications for the future reform of English qualifications.  相似文献   

Six into One: The Contradictory Art School Curriculum and how it Came About     

Nicholas Houghton 《The International Journal of Art & Design Education》2016,35(1):107-120

This article reports historical research which sought to understand the present‐day post‐secondary art curriculum through analysing its history in terms of changes in conceptions of art. It found that there have been six distinctive curricula: Apprentice, Academic, Formalist, Expressive, Conceptual and Professional. As a new curriculum has been introduced, it has co‐existed with much contained in a previous one. Most of the curriculum changes have taken place in the past 65 years. During this time, there has been a massive expansion in the education of artists and at the same time art schools accommodated first modernism and then post‐Duchampian aesthetics. A conclusion is that this has made for a very crowded curriculum. Moreover, despite there being an ever increasing choice of things a student might learn, it appears that there is nothing which all students have to learn. It can be problematic that one part of the curriculum is in contradiction to another part, and moreover this lack of a core raises fundamental, ontological questions about what art as a discipline is.  相似文献   

新课程背景下师生教学行为的异化与矫正     

赵传兵 《鸡西大学学报》2015,(4):1-3

新课改以来,由于对课改理念的僵硬化解读,学校精细化管理制度带来的压抑与控制,以及盲目模仿带来的伤根性移植,师生教学行为出现了异化现象:教学资源开发异化为材料的堆砌,教学方法选择异化为学生盲目的探究,教学环境营造异化为缺乏深度思维的"热热闹闹",教学评价异化为盲目赞扬。对课改理念进行个性化解读,学校积极营造创造性教学氛围,以及唤醒师生主体意识是教学异化行为矫正的重要路径。  相似文献   

我们该怎样做研究——对课程与教学论主流研究范式的反思     

马勇军 《课程.教材.教法》2011,(7)

重理论思辨、轻实践研究,研究方法简单粗糙,是当前课程与教学论主流研究范式的两大缺陷。欠缺科学精神、方法意识薄弱、评价机制不健全,是造成当前主流研究范式缺陷的主要原因。基于此,应从六个方面改善课程与教学论主流研究范式:关注对实践问题的微观研究和行动研究;加强方法意识,融入科学精神;建立课程与教学论的方法论体系;转变研究思维方式;改善现有评价体系;加强研究生培养过程中方法意识的培养和方法训练。  相似文献